lol @ being complete opposite to Kingdom.
[Interview] Coach ILoveoov - Page 2
Forum Index > BW General |
![]()
FragKrag
United States11539 Posts
lol @ being complete opposite to Kingdom. | ||
PoP
France15446 Posts
| ||
azndsh
United States4447 Posts
thanks for interview | ||
xBTx
Canada542 Posts
![]() | ||
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 25 2008 01:07 NonY[rC] wrote: I feel like these three answers give a much different vibe than Plexa's FE article gives. Anyone else get that feeling? Completely and totally. I honestly believe Plexa's article more than I believe Oov here. The winners mentality is more evident in his talking about mind games and raping the opponent. I think "not caring about performance" is more about the zen mentality of playing in his zone, not worrying about how the game turns out, just playing as hard as he can. Winning had to have been important though, considering the success he's enjoyed. I love the quote about giving back to the time. That's all warm and fuzzy ![]() | ||
Oxygen
Canada3581 Posts
| ||
Ack1027
United States7873 Posts
| ||
0xDEADBEEF
Germany1235 Posts
-Did your poor performance in 2006 make you decide to retire? is probably a lie or staged. Totally untypical for a progamer. Every progamer cares about winning, winning is the only important thing and gives a major motivation boost (while losing does the exact opposite).He probably said that to shed a better light on coaches in general, in order to not have people think that coaching would be just some kind of "catch basin" for fallen or unskilled progamers. Which it probably is. ![]() | ||
Elric
United Kingdom1327 Posts
It's really refreshing to read a (ex)progamer interview so honest and thoughtful. | ||
![]()
Waxangel
United States33075 Posts
| ||
![]()
Waxangel
United States33075 Posts
| ||
VioleTAK
Israel4279 Posts
| ||
niteReloaded
Croatia5281 Posts
I love every single answer he gave there. PS. he'd make a great poker player imo. The talk about not caring about the outcome, emphasising aggresion, he knows. | ||
Jayson X
Switzerland2431 Posts
I joined when Boxer was still on the team, and the team has declined so much since then. It’s obvious what he’s going to think of us once he gets out of the military. Maybe he doesn’t remember, but I remember getting scolded by him on battle.net. I wanted to make a team that Boxer wouldn’t be ashamed of. That's a very interesting answer and it shows how important Boxer was/is for the team and oov. Boxer might look at it totaly different, but oov feels the need to make SKT1 to something Boxer would be proud of. One can only imagine how strong the bond between these two is. | ||
Stegosaur
![]()
Netherlands1231 Posts
When you play, you have to start off with a mind to turn the game into a rape. If you do that, you’ll at least get a win. Oov <3 Adding to SKT's history of being the most hardcore. | ||
ColdLava
Canada1673 Posts
![]() Thanks | ||
![]()
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
| ||
Texas
Germany2388 Posts
| ||
ZpuX
Sweden1230 Posts
On March 25 2008 01:44 0xDEADBEEF wrote: The answer to is probably a lie or staged. Totally untypical for a progamer. Every progamer cares about winning, winning is the only important thing and gives a major motivation boost (while losing does the exact opposite). He probably said that to shed a better light on coaches in general, in order to not have people think that coaching would be just some kind of "catch basin" for fallen or unskilled progamers. Which it probably is. ![]() I think you are wrong, I play alot more when I lose. Winning is fun, but beating players you lost too is even better... I get really bored if I win a few games in a row, but when I lose I can keep playing for hours and hours. I think this is how the progamers feel aswell. Winning is good, but losing is even better because it gives you motivation to get better. | ||
merz
Sweden2760 Posts
I can agree with ZpuX if it's during "practice". Like when you just practice vs a couple of friends or on ICCup. But if it's in a major tournament or league, I don't think losing motivates you more than winning. | ||
| ||