EPTCorrelation of new SC:RM MMR to ICcup Ranking? - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
iFU.pauline
France1585 Posts
| ||
|
Power[Xp]
Netherlands64 Posts
On August 26 2017 18:19 iFU.pauline wrote: I am 1800 1900 mmr playing only kor and my iccup rank ranged between B A- Can I ask how you play Koreans only? I changed region to Asia and played on Korean server, but I still get to play Europeans. | ||
|
iFU.pauline
France1585 Posts
On August 26 2017 18:24 Power[Xp] wrote: Can I ask how you play Koreans only? I changed region to Asia and played on Korean server, but I still get to play Europeans. vpn, there is a thread about it in this section. | ||
|
Jealous
10166 Posts
1. Different populations. While ICCup was definitely very pyramidal in its structure (80% of players were D, 18% were C, 2% higher, roughly), the "bottom" of the Pyramid in SC:R MM is very low and broad. In other words, the average player is simply worse than they were on ICCup at this point in time. 2. Different rating scales. MMR and Elo and etc. cannot be compared to ICCup's activity-based system. If you played MotW, you only needed more than like 30% winrate against other D rank players to get to C-. 3. I expect hours of activity to affect MMR similar to how ICCup had "Korean hours." The same rating attributed to two people who have a wide disparity in skill due to environment. There are more reasons but I'm tired. In short, don't worry too much about translating rating scales, or rating scales in general. | ||
|
SuGo
United States681 Posts
Also, it depends who plays when ... if you play during a time zone where it's essentially dead for Koreans, you may only match foreigners and have an easier time. I'm currently sitting 2150-2250, but seem to match 90% Koreans due to the fact that the hours I play seem to coincide with peak Korean times as well. On the other side, I see a lot of foreigners who I know are not nearly as good as me, but are also ~2100. But it's probably because they don't get heavy Korean pairings. In short, who cares about rating. It's too early. Just practice and embrace the new system. | ||
|
noob_saibot
Russian Federation213 Posts
| ||
|
reneg
United States859 Posts
On August 26 2017 09:54 XERX wrote: points mean nothing right now wait until the rankings get released That is literally what the points are. Rankings. | ||
|
Poly_Optimize
Canada156 Posts
| ||
|
radley
Poland582 Posts
| ||
|
MymSlorm
Chile187 Posts
| ||
|
esReveR
United States567 Posts
On August 27 2017 00:41 reneg wrote: That is literally what the points are. Rankings. No. Blizzard is testing out the system and working out the bugs. When they get it fixed up, they are going to reset the ratings and potentially change to a letter grade system (see Gamescom interviews). Right now they literally mean nothing. | ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
On August 26 2017 08:32 lepape wrote: Well there's one thing I know, 1800 MMR on Europe/US is equal roughly to 1300 MMR on Korean server. ranked is global so u can play vs koris as higher as u come, u onyl not play them because of server lag but even then all 1600 on kor server i met was ... not good definetly not better then eu, koris are better but the good koris go up rly fast and there is a LOT of scrum in korea too xD | ||
|
iopq
United States939 Posts
On August 26 2017 07:54 arb wrote: i think someone was saying 1700-1750 was d+? but im not 100% certain on that obviously 2200+ is like A rank so maybe 1700 is somewhere in the C region? I'm 1900+ (getting USWest players even queuing from other servers), previously C on iccup | ||
|
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
one thing I don't understand is there is currently a jump in the ladder ranks between like 199 and 200, like the top 200 players all have 2100+ and then the 200th or 201th player has 1860 or smtg, there is a gap don't know where its coming from (edit: apparently its because of bug in the display of ladder ranking, if you scroll it up after selecting a region and "see myself" it ends up showing the ranks of the global ladder instead mixed in) | ||
|
reneg
United States859 Posts
On August 27 2017 13:57 esReveR wrote: No. Blizzard is testing out the system and working out the bugs. When they get it fixed up, they are going to reset the ratings and potentially change to a letter grade system (see Gamescom interviews). Right now they literally mean nothing. Sure, they might reset it, but that's still exactly what these points are measuring. If they change it to be a letter system, that doesn't change the fact that your letter is determined by your MMR Rating (which is what you currently see...) It's basically exactly like the SC2 system, where you have a ranking (Diamond/Masters/Etc), but have an MMR rating behind (which is really the only thing that matters).... | ||
|
Demurity
United States424 Posts
I was about B on iCCup, current ladder MMR is 2000. | ||
|
gDPhantom
New Zealand162 Posts
| ||
|
EndingLife
United States1594 Posts
| ||
|
oDieN[Siege]
United States2905 Posts
On August 30 2017 00:14 EndingLife wrote: It's going to be hard to compare as it seems to come down to your region, and when you play. I can only play after 8:00 PM so I'm getting matched with mostly Koreans. I was A- and currently at 2100 MMR. I only play at the times when KR's are sleeping. I avoid them. It's like hide and seek for me, except they don't know that we're playing. | ||
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
| ||
