|
On January 21 2016 20:04 Ciryandor wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 19:53 EngrishTeacher wrote:
Sorry don't really have time to go through the entire thread, so what's happening to BisuDagger now? I know he won't say much due to NDA, but can someone plz gimme a breakdown of the situation? Thanks in advance. He's casting now!
Awesome, good to see Afreeca do the right thing, spend just a tiny bit extra cash for a lot of good community PR, win-win for everyone:D
|
Is the TL Calendar for VANT Final wrong or are timezones even more confusing than I thought?
It says
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 05:00:00 -0500 (1 day, 19 hours)
But all information I found is that it starts at 17:00 KST (liquidpedia, pictures), and that's 3am EST (-5GMT).
Please fix if it's wrong, it would be egregious if people tuned in two hours late because the calendar was wrong.
|
On January 21 2016 23:03 Chef wrote:
Is the TL Calendar for VANT Final wrong or are timezones even more confusing than I thought?
It says
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 05:00:00 -0500 (1 day, 19 hours)
But all information I found is that it starts at 17:00 KST (liquidpedia, pictures), and that's 3am EST (-5GMT).
Please fix if it's wrong, it would be egregious if people tuned in two hours late because the calendar was wrong.
The 5am time probably stems from the time zone you set in your settings. It's going to start in 1 day and 19 hours, that's all you need to know. You can calculate what time it will be for you by then.
|
You've totally misunderstood the question.
Yes, someone has updated it, great! 
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 03:00:00 -0500 (1 day, 15 hours)
|
Croatia9504 Posts
Yep, calendar was wrong. Fixed now.
|
On January 22 2016 01:24 Chef wrote:
You've totally misunderstood the question.
Oh ok, sorry then. : /
|
On January 21 2016 20:33 Zera wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 18:55 todespolka wrote:On January 13 2016 19:52 Endymion wrote:+ Show Spoiler +didnt artosis say that sc2 was more strategically deep than scbw? lmfao, i hope tasteless comes back but tbh artosis just jumps where the money is... afreeca should get little 작은 수지 instead, if she wants to come back... Yes, but you misunderstood him. By more strategically deep he means strategy has more weight than skill. In bw a skilled player can overcome any strategical disadvantage. Also he means that sc2 is strategically more diverse than bw. In bw you play often the same strategy over and over again. Sometimes you make a timing attack but thats really rare. On the other side bw is tactically rich and early-, mid- and lategame have often distinct compositions. To all: I dont understand the need to talk sc2 bad because sc2 is just as good as bw, maybe even better in some points. The majority of sc2 plays 1vs1 (at least in ladder) while the majority of bw plays casual mods. Thats because sc2 1vs1 is more fun than bw 1vs1 (or do you play things which you dont enjoy). In bw teamgames were more fun. Also gaming environment has changed, the competition and technology is different. You cant really say which game is better. But people who act like bw is the greatest game on earth and bash on sc2, should ask them-self why the majority in korea plays lol over bw. Lol got even bigger than bw ever was. The popularity of bw is nothing compared to its past or to lol. I dont bash games here, i just talk about facts. Sc2 is the best rts we have and bw was a great game for its time which set new standards and helped to create e-sport in korea but in todays gaming environment its not a competition anymore. If bw wasnt famous i am not sure how much recognition it would get. Lol this passive agresive post :D
"You can't really say which game is better... I don't bash games here, I just talk about facts. Sc2 is the best rts we have..."
LOL
So proud of my Brood War brethren for not feeding the obvious troll.
|
Bisutopia19237 Posts
On January 22 2016 02:23 Jealous wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 20:33 Zera wrote:On January 21 2016 18:55 todespolka wrote:On January 13 2016 19:52 Endymion wrote:+ Show Spoiler +didnt artosis say that sc2 was more strategically deep than scbw? lmfao, i hope tasteless comes back but tbh artosis just jumps where the money is... afreeca should get little 작은 수지 instead, if she wants to come back... Yes, but you misunderstood him. By more strategically deep he means strategy has more weight than skill. In bw a skilled player can overcome any strategical disadvantage. Also he means that sc2 is strategically more diverse than bw. In bw you play often the same strategy over and over again. Sometimes you make a timing attack but thats really rare. On the other side bw is tactically rich and early-, mid- and lategame have often distinct compositions. To all: I dont understand the need to talk sc2 bad because sc2 is just as good as bw, maybe even better in some points. The majority of sc2 plays 1vs1 (at least in ladder) while the majority of bw plays casual mods. Thats because sc2 1vs1 is more fun than bw 1vs1 (or do you play things which you dont enjoy). In bw teamgames were more fun. Also gaming environment has changed, the competition and technology is different. You cant really say which game is better. But people who act like bw is the greatest game on earth and bash on sc2, should ask them-self why the majority in korea plays lol over bw. Lol got even bigger than bw ever was. The popularity of bw is nothing compared to its past or to lol. I dont bash games here, i just talk about facts. Sc2 is the best rts we have and bw was a great game for its time which set new standards and helped to create e-sport in korea but in todays gaming environment its not a competition anymore. If bw wasnt famous i am not sure how much recognition it would get. Lol this passive agresive post :D "You can't really say which game is better... I don't bash games here, I just talk about facts. Sc2 is the best rts we have..." LOL So proud of my Brood War brethren for not feeding the obvious troll.
We have years of experience. I expect trolls to pick up their game a little after all this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
