EPTHe is very fast player
http://bwreplays.com/tcfjs/dl
BW General Discussion - Page 100
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
dr0pship
Canada520 Posts
He is very fast player http://bwreplays.com/tcfjs/dl | ||
|
Probemicro
3708 Posts
| ||
Epoxide
Magic Woods9326 Posts
On February 04 2015 16:32 prech wrote: Yea the sidebar updates every 24 hours in some European timezone... the real time rankings are on the Players page  it's for avoiding spoilers | ||
c3rberUs
Japan11286 Posts
Forgot about that haha Also, you really hate Sea don't you? | ||
|
Xenocide_Knight
Korea (South)2625 Posts
On February 04 2015 19:39 c3rberUs wrote: Forgot about that haha Also, you really hate Sea don't you? Pretty natural for an overrated player to have antifans | ||
prech
United States2948 Posts
Ah, very reasonable! On February 04 2015 17:18 Probemicro wrote: how is sea still number 2 Sea's been strong in the 41 Starleague, having gone undefeated thus far. Also having not lost a great number of leagues matches. Who knows what would have happened had he participated in SSL 10... | ||
|
Epoxide
Magic Woods9326 Posts
On February 04 2015 19:39 c3rberUs wrote: Forgot about that haha Also, you really hate Sea don't you? What makes you think that? I love Sea | ||
Peeano
Netherlands5214 Posts
Every game I tried to join seems to have either a lagger or the damn host is a NAH user. ICCup seems as dead as before. Is it the right conclusion? I wish ICCup would make AH a prerequisite to use the server, /nah only works if you're the host. Besides it defeats the whole purpose of choosing to play on ICCup rather than battlet.net, apart from poor people who refuse to buy a BW copy of course. | ||
|
Peeano
Netherlands5214 Posts
Having played a different game, I now miss-click way too often in BW. | ||
|
HyralGambit
2439 Posts
Blue Storm? Match Point? Destination? | ||
|
Stratos
Czech Republic6104 Posts
dat face per minute | ||
|
prech
United States2948 Posts
| ||
|
LetaBot
Netherlands557 Posts
On February 06 2015 04:34 Peeano wrote: So with all the great BW events going on in mind, I finally boot up ICCup again after months. Every game I tried to join seems to have either a lagger or the damn host is a NAH user. ICCup seems as dead as before. Is it the right conclusion? I wish ICCup would make AH a prerequisite to use the server, /nah only works if you're the host. Besides it defeats the whole purpose of choosing to play on ICCup rather than battlet.net, apart from poor people who refuse to buy a BW copy of course. I sometimes let my bot play unranked games on ICCUP with AH off because AH does not work together with the BWAPI. | ||
|
Elyvilon
United States13143 Posts
On February 06 2015 04:59 HyralGambit wrote: Out of curiosity: what is the best balanced/designed 2 player map and why it isn't more standard like FS and CB? No comment on best balanced/designed 2 player map, but I think they're not more standard on like ladder play is that there's a lot more bullshit/cheese you can do on a 2 player map and people don't want to have to deal with that. | ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On February 06 2015 04:59 HyralGambit wrote: Out of curiosity: what is the best balanced/designed 2 player map and why it isn't more standard like FS and CB? Blue Storm? Match Point? Destination? Maybe go into the TLPD and check the win percentages? Of the 3 maps you mention, Blue Storm seems the most balanced, with no matchup worse than 53-47. (but as the other poster mentioned, it's definitely a pretty cheese-iriffic map, as 2p maps in general tend to be) | ||
|
HyralGambit
2439 Posts
On February 06 2015 22:30 [[Starlight]] wrote: Maybe go into the TLPD and check the win percentages? Of the 3 maps you mention, Blue Storm seems the most balanced, with no matchup worse than 53-47. (but as the other poster mentioned, it's definitely a pretty cheese-iriffic map, as 2p maps in general tend to be) I tend to not focus on win % when discussing BW balance. Katrina was shit until FlaSh's Double Armory came into meta, which makes Katrina okay in the 2015 meta judging from LoveTV test maps games last year. | ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19305 Posts
On February 07 2015 04:02 HyralGambit wrote: I tend to not focus on win % when discussing BW balance. Katrina was shit until FlaSh's Double Armory came into meta, which makes Katrina okay in the 2015 meta judging from LoveTV test maps games last year. My vote goes to Match Point. The spawn distances are long enough that cheese is not encouraged, but aggressive openings are still feasible. The main is large but maintainable. The natural is obtainable even though with it's unique entrance and cliff side low ground. Match Point is truly about picking a good opening and playing reactionary to your opponent. I don't recall many games where I'd blame balance as the reason for the players loss. | ||
Kau
Canada3500 Posts
| ||
|
rotta
5598 Posts
On February 07 2015 05:23 Kau wrote: How about Monty Hall? Players of relatively lower skill levels can pull upsets on that map therefore making it balanced. Good times <3 | ||
|
xboi209
United States1173 Posts
On February 06 2015 04:34 Peeano wrote: So with all the great BW events going on in mind, I finally boot up ICCup again after months. Every game I tried to join seems to have either a lagger or the damn host is a NAH user. ICCup seems as dead as before. Is it the right conclusion? I wish ICCup would make AH a prerequisite to use the server, /nah only works if you're the host. Besides it defeats the whole purpose of choosing to play on ICCup rather than battlet.net, apart from poor people who refuse to buy a BW copy of course. I believe ICCup forced AH one time but decided not to anymore because people didn't want to load it themselves(which meant: low population). | ||
| ||
