|
I'm really pleased with BW graphics, and in fact I really do prefer BW graphics over "super hyper ultra high" SC2 graphics any day, but I sincerely can't buy this golden ratio thing :s
BW graphics are really nice and I do not think it is due to this golden aspect ratio.
On October 08 2012 21:48 aquados wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2012 20:27 zefreak wrote:
A bit of confirmation bias? This is like 100% pareidolia. Look at screenshots of a random, shitty game and you will 'find' the ratio everywhere. Why?
Lack of rigor. You aren't doing math, you are drawing boxes around things that (vaguely) approximate the golden ratio. Which BTW is NOT a difficult concept to grasp. It's the kind of thing that gets kids interested in mathematics.
The bit about the brain being able to grasp an image/be more attracted to the golden ratio has been debunked as well. A: we have no fucking CLUE about how our brain works, B: a normal person only uses like 10% of their brain compacity so maby it DOES help if the person has a higher use of its compacity
Man, B is proven very wrong already.
|
|
|
|
|
Russian Federation1893 Posts
On October 08 2012 20:27 zefreak wrote:
A bit of confirmation bias? This is like 100% pareidolia. Look at screenshots of a random, shitty game and you will 'find' the ratio everywhere. Why?
Lack of rigor. You aren't doing math, you are drawing boxes around things that (vaguely) approximate the golden ratio. Which BTW is NOT a difficult concept to grasp. It's the kind of thing that gets kids interested in mathematics.
The bit about the brain being able to grasp an image/be more attracted to the golden ratio has been debunked as well. You joined TL starting with SC2, didn't you? 
|
You see too much nonexistent patterns, take a break dude
|
Just gotta ask, is it the same with lower and upper case letters when it comes to golden ratio? For example:
Ee
is that also golden ratio (the height of the letters?) :O
|
I just took a dump and the feces had an aspect ratio between 1:1 and 1:10, i.e. approximately the golden ratio.
|
Russian Federation1893 Posts
|
You see too much nonexistent patterns, take a break dude
Haha, this. I mean, OP reminds me of art critics that invent things the artist never thought about, just to sound smart. I thought the OP was ironic/meant to be funny, but it actually seems serious?
|
|
|
United States33452 Posts
really forced, still cute
|
Portugal1676 Posts
On October 08 2012 23:48 Rus_Brain wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2012 20:27 zefreak wrote:
A bit of confirmation bias? This is like 100% pareidolia. Look at screenshots of a random, shitty game and you will 'find' the ratio everywhere. Why?
Lack of rigor. You aren't doing math, you are drawing boxes around things that (vaguely) approximate the golden ratio. Which BTW is NOT a difficult concept to grasp. It's the kind of thing that gets kids interested in mathematics.
The bit about the brain being able to grasp an image/be more attracted to the golden ratio has been debunked as well. You joined TL starting with SC2, didn't you?
I played BW on release and I still think you're full of shit. Also, what does that have to do with anything? BW elitism much? I like the clarity of BW graphics more than I like SC2's, but it's not like BW is the pinnacle of godly and untouchable graphics. Stop acting like it is.
User was warned for this post
|
Russian Federation1893 Posts
On October 09 2012 07:01 howLiN wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2012 23:48 Rus_Brain wrote:On October 08 2012 20:27 zefreak wrote:
A bit of confirmation bias? This is like 100% pareidolia. Look at screenshots of a random, shitty game and you will 'find' the ratio everywhere. Why?
Lack of rigor. You aren't doing math, you are drawing boxes around things that (vaguely) approximate the golden ratio. Which BTW is NOT a difficult concept to grasp. It's the kind of thing that gets kids interested in mathematics.
The bit about the brain being able to grasp an image/be more attracted to the golden ratio has been debunked as well. You joined TL starting with SC2, didn't you? I played BW on release and I still think you're full of shit. Also, what does that have to do with anything? BW elitism much? I like the clarity of BW graphics more than I like SC2's, but it's not like BW is the pinnacle of godly and untouchable graphics. Stop acting like it is. Whatever, bro <3
User was warned for this post
|
So yea that warcraft 2 engine was really advanced for its time...
|
It was very aesthetic and beautiful.
|
I know the math. I loved the pictures. Now make me one like the vitruvian man by Da Vinci but with a hydralisk and I'll start selling it on the streets.
|
On October 09 2012 09:57 Jaevlaterran wrote:I know the math. I loved the pictures. Now make me one like the vitruvian man by Da Vinci but with a hydralisk and I'll start selling it on the streets.
A zealot would be better, because of the arms.
|
omg you can split pictures into thirds....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
