I really like what you've done here, and I definitely would like to see more of it later on in the season when there is more data.

Although this doesn't show who's better or worse, it is interesting to see what team is balanced/imbalanced vs results

Kenpachi

United States9908 Posts

October 28 2010 21:39 GMT

#62

i found lots of things to be really funny

Captain Peabody

United States3091 Posts

October 28 2010 21:42 GMT

#63

This is cool, but it doesn't really say all that much at this point; I'd be interested in seeing the results later, when there's more data to work with.

Cool stuff, though.

Selth

United States469 Posts

November 04 2010 19:00 GMT

#64

This is interesting stuff. I think the "balance" that is trying to be calculated here is how evenly are the players pulling their weight for the team. Now it doesn't necessarily reflect that some players are better than others in the grand scheme but rather it reflects how they are doing now this particular round (i.e. Fantasy slumping. So much internal rage.) These numbers will be dependent on whether players dominate or fall into slumps and the length of time these periods occur. So this isn't exactly a predictor for things to come but it's interesting work nonetheless.

Thanks Tasou for the work.

ramen-

90 Posts

November 04 2010 19:04 GMT

#65

Awesome, if starcraft is supposed to be a sport, then we need more stats, even if they're not obviously useful

krndandaman

Mozambique16569 Posts

November 04 2010 20:23 GMT

#66

--- Nuked ---

letian

Germany4221 Posts

November 04 2010 20:43 GMT

#67

Very very sexy, some additional stats are always welcome, indeed its a hell of entertainment.

mierin

United States4943 Posts

November 04 2010 22:58 GMT

#68

I think this is the first time I've ever said...Oz imba!!

Lightningbullet

United States507 Posts

November 05 2010 01:33 GMT

#69

hmmmmmm.. well STX isn't doing too well yet.

Chimpalimp

United States1135 Posts

November 05 2010 02:06 GMT

#70

Coolio graphs. Tho I don't think this is that relevant without including several other variables. It would be cool to see some analysis regarding which team is best suited to win in the quarter finals, or which 4 players are most likely to win the MSL/OSL based on their records and the upcoming match-ups.

OpticalShot

Canada6330 Posts

November 05 2010 03:51 GMT

#71

This thread could be more awesome if you updated it every round, giving both per-round statistics and cumulative (overall) statistics.

ndralcasid

United States524 Posts

November 05 2010 05:25 GMT

#72

It's a cool graph, although there are flaws. MBC doesn't seem no where near as balanced when you consider that it's literally only those six (Sea/Light/Hyun/Saint/Jaehoon/Tyson) that actually ever play.

Still, good work. These graphs are definitely interesting reads

_Quasar_

Russian Federation4405 Posts

November 05 2010 06:28 GMT

#73

What is "stdev"? I didn't find it anywhere in ur post.

But anyway, the idea is COOL. \m/_

Meapak_Ziphh

United States6784 Posts

November 05 2010 06:46 GMT

#74

Sexy charts, will you update them as the season goes? Poor KHAN

Iplaythings

Denmark9110 Posts

November 05 2010 06:53 GMT

#75

You mentioned what this graph shows wrong, its supposed to show how well the wins that the team has is balanced out between the player it is using.

Its not about depth, but about variance in play that would make high on the list.