Video casting made simple! - Page 4
Forum Index > BW General |
CruisEric
35 Posts
| ||
pR0gR4m3R
Spain1446 Posts
So cool that we got this kinda website for casters like me that used to get crazy with recording audio, sync, ect.. THANKS A LOT | ||
MK
United States496 Posts
On August 31 2010 21:07 CruisEric wrote: is this only for videos on youtube? lets say i have a replay and i want to cast that, would i be able to use elive or do i have to record the replay and upload to youtube first? how about when they do the live streams of like MSL/OSL finals. can i enter the link of the stream into elive and cast from that? I've answered this kind of questions already. Basically, for now, you have to put your video on Youtube first: you can do it directly on YT or via eLive in the castboard. We don't want to be a video host/provider because we don't have the money and the skills to do it. So, yes, you have to record the replay and upload it first. Live stream is a problem. In theory, it won't be hard but livestream, ustream or JustinTV don't have a good API enough for us (lack of key features so we can't synchronize with it) for now. But we are already working on a LIVE stream system of our own to let you guys cast on LIVE video directly from your PC. Also, soon, you'll be able to embed LIVE content on forums or blogs. | ||
MK
United States496 Posts
http://content.elive.pro/public/documents/eLive_casting_manual.pdf http://content.elive.pro/public/documents/eLive_general_manual.pdf Btw, thanks so much for the bug reports and testing eLive. We are currently working on something big and we'll keep you updated ![]() | ||
blahman3344
United States2015 Posts
I always wanted to cast, so this would be perfect for helping me get started! thanks so much, i really appreciate it! I'm gonna try it asap. =0 | ||
mrdx
Vietnam1555 Posts
![]() ![]() Adding an export option would make the site even more useful I think (also it won't eat up your bandwidth too much because people could upload their work elsewhere). You can add an eLive watermark on the exported videos, I think people won't mind. ![]() | ||
MK
United States496 Posts
On September 02 2010 10:27 mrdx wrote: Very nice work ![]() ![]() Adding an export option would make the site even more useful I think (also it won't eat up your bandwidth too much because people could upload their work elsewhere). You can add an eLive watermark on the exported videos, I think people won't mind. ![]() Once again this is not about the "watermark" or "by eLive". This is really a core belief shared by the whole team : we want the source to be clean in order to let anyone else to do his own cast with the same data. When someone watches a video on eLive that been casted with a video from Youtube, the number of views increases which means that even if the original video is not directly watched on Youtube, it still receives the reward (number of views). Plus, each time someone watch a cast and click on the video, it gives you the Youtube link to the original video (and the Youtube ID is always written on eLive). This is key because if people bring source video to the community but in return don't receive nothing, this sucks. Imagine you upload a Korea match on Youtube, people cast on this video and export to their own account and receive all the comments, views and no one knows who brought the original one. edit : typo ![]() | ||
mrdx
Vietnam1555 Posts
On September 02 2010 10:43 MK wrote: Once again this is not about the "watermark" or "by eLive". This is really a core belief shared by the whole team : we want the source to be clean in order to let anyone else to do his own cast with the same data. When someone watches a video on eLive that been casted with a video from Youtube, the number of views increases which means that even if the original video is not directly watched on Youtube, it still receives the reward (number of views). Plus, each time someone watch a cast and click on the video, it gives you the Youtube link to the original video (and the Youtube ID is always written on eLive). This is key because if people bring source video to the community but in return don't receive nothing, this sucks. Imagine you upload a Korea match on Youtube, people cast on this video and export to their own account and receive all the comments, views and no one knows who brought the original one. edit : typo ![]() Well, people could still honour the uploader of the original video by saying that in their commentary or description ![]() I'm just saying this from the perspective of a developer rather than a user. By not having the option to export the video, commentators will have to rely on eLive to host their works, which they might find restrictive (let's be realistic, most commentators will want to be able to upload their works on Youtube or have it backed up on their hard drive). Imagine if a web graphic tool like Picnik or Photoshop.com stops allowing you to download the final product and force you to go to their web site if you want to show it to someone. Do not get me wrong, I'm totally blown away by eLive and its ease of use. What you have done is absolutely amazing. I just think that the lack of an export option may keep some commentators (especially the more serious ones) away from using it. ![]() | ||
a176
Canada6688 Posts
![]() | ||
MK
United States496 Posts
On September 02 2010 15:21 mrdx wrote: Well, people could still honour the uploader of the original video by saying that in their commentary or description ![]() I'm just saying this from the perspective of a developer rather than a user. By not having the option to export the video, commentators will have to rely on eLive to host their works, which they might find restrictive (let's be realistic, most commentators will want to be able to upload their works on Youtube or have it backed up on their hard drive). Imagine if a web graphic tool like Picnik or Photoshop.com stops allowing you to download the final product and force you to go to their web site if you want to show it to someone. Do not get me wrong, I'm totally blown away by eLive and its ease of use. What you have done is absolutely amazing. I just think that the lack of an export option may keep some commentators (especially the more serious ones) away from using it. ![]() Nice point. We'll discuss about that and keep you updated. | ||
DejaVu119
United States131 Posts
Last night, I found out about a new casting tool called eLive. As advertised, it would allow commentators to cast games without downloading, uploading, or even editing the youtube and audio files we use. I think I speak for every commentator when I say that such a claim lies somewhere between the realms of intriguing and awe-inspiring (the number of programs, trials, errors, and editing nightmares that have been experienced are, well, flabbergasting). While hopeful, I wasn't sure if it would really work as easily as the video and .pdfs claimed. I wanted to cast the OSL semifinals series between stork and jaedong; so i used the match as a test trial of eLive's beta. I got a key in like 15 minutes (thanks guys). At first, I was frustrated because the casting program wouldn't start for me. I thought "oh great, this is yet another tool that I can't use because my computer and/or internet is garbage." Turns out, it was just a beta bug that was fixed in just a few hours of the error report (talk about fast tech support). This morning, I finally sat down to cast the games and I was EXTREMELY pleased with the system. First off, the interface is both simple and has a very familiar feel to it. The casting program takes a youtube video of a game and puts it into its player with essentially the same interface as a youtube page. You can have different videos, texts, and images and easily swap between them or keep them playing in the background. i.e. you could leave a game running and flash pictures of the players or the map during the intro. I didn't incorporate this feature, but I played around with it and it seemed very easy and viable. When I went to cast the games I kept it very standard and simple to test out the system. One of the few things I found annoying was that when I clicked "start" to begin the cast, my video didn't also start. I had to click play on the video interface as well. Basically, it means that for a moment at the start of each video there is a blank screen. Mildly aesthetically annoying, but not a real problem. Other than that, the casting experience was very easy. Minimizing and maximizing the video or pausing and starting it again gave no problems. A very nice feature in both casting and watching is the audio controls that allow you to control the volume level of both yourself and the video (no more re-ups because I forgot to turn down the Koreans!!). Once I finished each video, I simply clicked "stop," edited some info for the VOD, and clicked "finalize." eLive does the rest. There is no editing required!! Simply cast what you see, and your viewers see what you see and hear what you say. As it is in Beta, there are some issues of course. Most of them are aesthetic and minor/easily fixed. Issues: * Audio has some static that doesn't appear when recording using audacity or windows sound recorder * Unable to edit title, description, or playlist after finalizing * No "video response" feature as of yet * More intricate compilation videos are probably infeasible using eLive * Appears to only allow uploaded videos - no screen capture Here is my profile on eLive so you can watch the games! Later, I will try using some of the features such as incorporating text/links into VODS, drawing on screen, etc. to see how viable they are during a cast. eLive also claims to make multi-casting very easy and I will try to test that out and let everyone know how it works. | ||
MK
United States496 Posts
On September 03 2010 03:25 DejaVu119 wrote: I put this in a blog already cuz i couldn't find this thread before. Anyways, I used it and wrote a little review. Last night, I found out about a new casting tool called eLive. As advertised, it would allow commentators to cast games without downloading, uploading, or even editing the youtube and audio files we use. I think I speak for every commentator when I say that such a claim lies somewhere between the realms of intriguing and awe-inspiring (the number of programs, trials, errors, and editing nightmares that have been experienced are, well, flabbergasting). While hopeful, I wasn't sure if it would really work as easily as the video and .pdfs claimed. I wanted to cast the OSL semifinals series between stork and jaedong; so i used the match as a test trial of eLive's beta. I got a key in like 15 minutes (thanks guys). At first, I was frustrated because the casting program wouldn't start for me. I thought "oh great, this is yet another tool that I can't use because my computer and/or internet is garbage." Turns out, it was just a beta bug that was fixed in just a few hours of the error report (talk about fast tech support). This morning, I finally sat down to cast the games and I was EXTREMELY pleased with the system. First off, the interface is both simple and has a very familiar feel to it. The casting program takes a youtube video of a game and puts it into its player with essentially the same interface as a youtube page. You can have different videos, texts, and images and easily swap between them or keep them playing in the background. i.e. you could leave a game running and flash pictures of the players or the map during the intro. I didn't incorporate this feature, but I played around with it and it seemed very easy and viable. When I went to cast the games I kept it very standard and simple to test out the system. One of the few things I found annoying was that when I clicked "start" to begin the cast, my video didn't also start. I had to click play on the video interface as well. Basically, it means that for a moment at the start of each video there is a blank screen. Mildly aesthetically annoying, but not a real problem. Other than that, the casting experience was very easy. Minimizing and maximizing the video or pausing and starting it again gave no problems. A very nice feature in both casting and watching is the audio controls that allow you to control the volume level of both yourself and the video (no more re-ups because I forgot to turn down the Koreans!!). Once I finished each video, I simply clicked "stop," edited some info for the VOD, and clicked "finalize." eLive does the rest. There is no editing required!! Simply cast what you see, and your viewers see what you see and hear what you say. As it is in Beta, there are some issues of course. Most of them are aesthetic and minor/easily fixed. Issues: * Audio has some static that doesn't appear when recording using audacity or windows sound recorder * Unable to edit title, description, or playlist after finalizing * No "video response" feature as of yet * More intricate compilation videos are probably infeasible using eLive * Appears to only allow uploaded videos - no screen capture Here is my profile on eLive so you can watch the games! Later, I will try using some of the features such as incorporating text/links into VODS, drawing on screen, etc. to see how viable they are during a cast. eLive also claims to make multi-casting very easy and I will try to test that out and let everyone know how it works. Thanks for your review. I remember my team talking about your issues and we are happy everything is finally fixed. We put real effort in "fast tech support" for 2 main reasons : 1-we absolutely adored DELL tech support (they sent me a brand new battery in less than 12H when I was in Paris). 2-we absolutely hate blogger tech support who never answered. Oh, yes, after a month. :p Also, about the BETA bugs. Actually, this is why we really need you testing eLive. We've managed to make the BETA as solid as possible but still, we developed it in near-perfect condition and once put online, we never know. For instance, some bugs don't happen in France but always come out when using Chinese connection :/ We'd also thanks the one (recognize himself) who reported about some security issues (and thanks for not hacking us). So don't hesitate to tell about your experience. Ok, now the issues/questions: -I found annoying was that when I clicked "start" to begin the cast ->Actually, we made it like that because some people like to put some wallpaper/text/url/whatever before playing the video. But if the minority, after few weeks, find it sux, yeah, we'll definitely change it. For now, we prefer to keep it like that. -Mildly aesthetically annoying, but not a real problem. ->The designers are working on different "themes" so in the next version, users are able to choose and customize quite everything. -Audio has some static that doesn't appear when recording using audacity or windows sound recorder ->This could be a problem from Flash 10.1. I'll talk about it with Matoo-. Actually, I had this issue with my old mic and now (I've bought a Sony ECM-MS907), I don't have the problem anymore. It could also be a problem with the drivers but why it doesn't happen in Audacity ? Well, clueless. But we'll definitely look at this and keep you on track. -Unable to edit title, description, or playlist after finalizing ->Yes, we hate it too and this is why we are already working on it. Next release, promise. -No "video response" feature as of yet ->Oh. Never thought about this one and I've actually never used on YT so I didn't know it was so important but ok, we'll see what we can do. -More intricate compilation videos are probably infeasible using eLive ->Hmm, well, eLive isn't Adobe Premier Online. We actually had a first behind-closed door demo with a lot of features but eLive was like a nuclear weapon factory with a looooot of buttons and tick boxes everywhere. So we thought it would be actually better to keep it simple because eLive is made to make your life easier. If casters really want to turn pro, they have better tools offline and we won't be able to compete against Adobe, Sony & co :p But still, you guys can make crazy stuffs with a little imagination and God know how creative this community is. -Appears to only allow uploaded videos - no screen capture ->Yup, we've been PMed a lot about this one and the "LIVE" one. Actually we know how to do it simply but, without any BS, the problem is the cost. It just costs SO MUCH to do Live (and screen capture is kinda like this if we want you to be able to really "screencast"). So the obvious way to do it is try to raise money from Ventures or whatever but, guess what, it's hard to find investors :p BUT, we are currently working on a new idea that could help us to do LIVE video without having to sell ourselves. I can't promise anything but we'll definitely work hard and keep you guys updated. | ||
Matoo-
Canada1397 Posts
- Playlists are already editable. On your profile page, there's a link "Manage playlists" where you can create/rename/delete playlists and drag&drop vods in and out of them. - Audio static: right-click on the player and click "Settings" and a small panel will pop out. There's a microphone tab on it where you can activate echo cancelling and also set your recording volume to avoid maxing out. If that doesn't help I'm going to run a few tests to find out if something's wrong on our side. | ||
Never.Die
Japan189 Posts
| ||
MK
United States496 Posts
eLive is now OPEN BETA: everyone can now join us to cast! Here's something I'd really lik to see more: http://www.elive.pro/watch/Uh0xYVFOhSwI a SC match originally casted in English now with Spanish version (use the volume "+" tu change the volume separately). This would be awesome if everyone can dub the VODs in their own language to democratize eSports! Btw, thx everyone who tested the private beta and ty for your feedbacks! | ||
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
MK
United States496 Posts
| ||
xccam
Great Britain1150 Posts
![]() Brilliant idea guys and seems very slick. | ||
SUSUGAM
United States177 Posts
![]() | ||
MK
United States496 Posts
On October 08 2010 18:17 SUSUGAM wrote: seriously, this website is pretty awesome. not only for game casting, but also dubbing over your friends, or really dubbing any youtube in general... it's quite fun and entertaining. i can see this catching on a bit. good luck with getting word out there. I do suggest you push it beyond gaming to reach more people. it'd be good for your traffic, but maybe not great for its community. ![]() this is exactly why we invented the TABs : and yeah, we definitely should reach the mass audience... but we don't know how to do it without money T.T | ||
| ||