The best of Moltkewarding?

On January 06 2009 09:40 MoltkeWarding wrote:
I applied for UWO, Toronto, McMaster, Waterloo, and Queen's. I was accepted to all of them; here was my reasoning:

UWO- Too close to home
McMaster- No one likes Hamilton
Waterloo- Too many nerds, too many Asians (pros: strong German department)
Toronto- Anonymity in a metropolis
Queen's- Strong academic reputation in the humanities, and correspondingly small Asian population

All I can say from my Queen's experience is- community spirit is a bad thing. Don't live on campus.

On January 06 2009 09:40 MoltkeWarding wrote:
I applied for UWO, Toronto, McMaster, Waterloo, and Queen's. I was accepted to all of them; here was my reasoning:

UWO- Too close to home
McMaster- No one likes Hamilton
Waterloo- Too many nerds, too many Asians (pros: strong German department)
Toronto- Anonymity in a metropolis
Queen's- Strong academic reputation in the humanities, and correspondingly small Asian population

All I can say from my Queen's experience is- community spirit is a bad thing. Don't live on campus.

On January 26 2009 11:51 Cambium wrote:




so typical, lol

On January 26 2009 12:07 KizZBG wrote:

wait isnt Moltke asian himself? lol

On April 18 2008 07:35 MoltkeWarding wrote:
Completely wrong. A mutalisk's primary attack is so weak that it takes five hits to kill an unarmed terran civilian. Its defenses are so weak that it can be brought down by depleted uranium shells, the same as those used by the US army. I'd like to see anyone bring down a F-16 with infantry weapons.

In a verses match we take evidence, not conjecture into account. We cannot assume that wraiths are more powerful than F-16s merely because they exist several hundred years into the future. The only admissible evidence is what is canonical: primary source being the game, and secondly any fiction.

Thus far we have seen Terran technology to be a mixed bag; while using some futuristic technology such as cloaking, it is also incredibly backward in many ways (the vertically shaped, double-barrelled, short-barrelled siege tank for instance, is a poor pre-WW2 armour design which could easily be outgunned by a Panther or T-34-85.

All evidence suggests that the mutalisk is incapable of out-fighting a 4th generation fighter, when it is outranged by infantry and has a much more difficult time doing damage to a supply depot, for instance, than a F-16 would in a ground attack role.

In one of those periodic "post hot girls" threads, Moltke wrote:
The point is none of these women are marriable.

Pictures don't tell much about how attractive someone really is.

How can you know whether you're attracted to a person or not until you know

-Their religion, and respective piety
-Their family and family history
-Their socio-economic class
-Their artistic and literary talents
-Their sensitivity, romanticism and sentimentalism
-Their patriotism, provincialism, and rootedness in their native culture
-Their cooking, cleaning and other domestic abilities
-Their mental and emotional stability
-Their historical attitude and preferences regarding bourgeois family life
-Their racial origins (if not already clear)
-Their feminine virtues (virginity, modesty, etc)

The above listed constitute 95% of the qualifications for any marriable and therefore attractive girl

On January 26 2009 12:52 food wrote:
bookmarked for near future

On January 27 2009 08:58 Manit0u wrote:


He fails at it. But he gets 5 points for trying.