|
|
|
congrats 
|
United States24743 Posts
This blog has motivated me to apply some thought to the issue of how/when iccup blogs are 'ok'. I think it should be declared that ICCUP should be required to provide something new or interesting.
|
United States17042 Posts
On October 10 2008 08:49 micronesia wrote:
This blog has motivated me to apply some thought to the issue of how/when iccup blogs are 'ok'. I think it should be declared that ICCUP should be required to provide something new or interesting.
It depends what you think the "blog" function on tl.net should mean. If the blog is supposed to be a place for people to write their own thoughts/ideas, then people writing about their own iccup accomplishments is just fine. however, If the blog needs 2 requirements (something interesting to the writer, as well as something that would contribute to some % of the tl.net community at large), then there would need to be a lot more limits.
|
woooooooooooooooow you played alot
|
|
|
Awesome man, congrats. My current goal is to reach C- by the end of the season, and I'm stuck around the low-D+ level. But I only have like 75 games played this season with about 38% win record.
I'm quite the opposite for matchups - ZvZ is my worst matchup and ZvP is by far my best.
|
I just got to C- as well, playing a mix of T and P. Feels gooooooood =)
I went 44-42 though...haha what a shitty record.
|
On October 10 2008 09:07 clazziquai wrote:
I just got to C- as well, playing a mix of T and P. Feels gooooooood =)
I went 44-42 though...haha what a shitty record.
Have you been playing lower ranks? I'm pretty sure that kind of record with same rank on MOTW gets you near a C or at C level
|
On October 10 2008 09:09 Superiorwolf wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2008 09:07 clazziquai wrote:
I just got to C- as well, playing a mix of T and P. Feels gooooooood =)
I went 44-42 though...haha what a shitty record. Have you been playing lower ranks? I'm pretty sure that kind of record with same rank on MOTW gets you near a C or at C level
I've been playing D+ constantly o.o and kept losing ........and it wasn't on MOTW either >_>
|
I am so dreading how my stats will look at C-. It's already down to 13-12 D+ :-(
|
On October 10 2008 09:13 EtherealDeath wrote:
I am so dreading how my stats will look at C-. It's already down to 13-12 D+ :-(
It is painful right? First when I got to D I believe I went like 13-2 then I kept losing and losing and FUCKING LOSING!!!!
|
United States24743 Posts
On October 10 2008 08:54 waterdragon wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2008 08:49 micronesia wrote:
This blog has motivated me to apply some thought to the issue of how/when iccup blogs are 'ok'. I think it should be declared that ICCUP should be required to provide something new or interesting. It depends what you think the "blog" function on tl.net should mean. If the blog is supposed to be a place for people to write their own thoughts/ideas, then people writing about their own iccup accomplishments is just fine. however, If the blog needs 2 requirements (something interesting to the writer, as well as something that would contribute to some % of the tl.net community at large), then there would need to be a lot more limits.
Well there's a history, although the message has been inconsistent.
|
United States43292 Posts
On October 10 2008 08:49 micronesia wrote:
This blog has motivated me to apply some thought to the issue of how/when iccup blogs are 'ok'. I think it should be declared that ICCUP should be required to provide something new or interesting.
I always assumed that if it was generally relevant to a lot of people then it was general forum and if it was relevant to you personally then blog.
|
On October 10 2008 09:30 Kwark wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2008 08:49 micronesia wrote:
This blog has motivated me to apply some thought to the issue of how/when iccup blogs are 'ok'. I think it should be declared that ICCUP should be required to provide something new or interesting. I always assumed that if it was generally relevant to a lot of people then it was general forum and if it was relevant to you personally then blog.
I second that
|
United States24743 Posts
On October 10 2008 09:30 Kwark wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2008 08:49 micronesia wrote:
This blog has motivated me to apply some thought to the issue of how/when iccup blogs are 'ok'. I think it should be declared that ICCUP should be required to provide something new or interesting. I always assumed that if it was generally relevant to a lot of people then it was general forum and if it was relevant to you personally then blog.
I have no problem with that distinction. It really isn't related to what I'm thinking about though since the issue is whether or not something is 'blogworthy' and you do have to agree tl has been inconsistent about how strict they are about that.
|
Grats on C- ^^ I just dislike your name, there is no such thing as "too much zerg" 
|
On October 10 2008 08:57 jimminy_kriket wrote:
woooooooooooooooow you played alot
ditto o.O
|
On October 10 2008 08:49 micronesia wrote:
This blog has motivated me to apply some thought to the issue of how/when iccup blogs are 'ok'. I think it should be declared that ICCUP should be required to provide something new or interesting.
every post that comes out of u in another persons blog is negative
|
On October 10 2008 09:15 clazziquai wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2008 09:13 EtherealDeath wrote:
I am so dreading how my stats will look at C-. It's already down to 13-12 D+ :-( It is painful right? First when I got to D I believe I went like 13-2 then I kept losing and losing and FUCKING LOSING!!!!
^^ happening to me 
i feel like im right between d and d+
i beat d's like 70% of the time
and visa versa for d+ players
*sigh*
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/3880/choooomg5.png)
