|
On July 04 2014 01:54 Heyoka wrote: I once dated a woman who constantly beat me at Tetris and frankly I'm still mad about it. I dated a girl that beated me at Counter strike. Damn that was hot :D
|
On a serious note does anyone know what the highest solo queue MMR is for a woman? I've always found it interesting how uninterested most women are in trying to make video games a serious hobby even if they enjoy playing; while when it comes to real sports women make up some of the best athletes in the world.
|
what sport would that be :O
|
On July 06 2014 03:35 misirlou wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2014 01:54 Heyoka wrote: I once dated a woman who constantly beat me at Tetris and frankly I'm still mad about it. I dated a girl that beated me at Counter strike. Damn that was hot :D
My gilrfriend (most of the time) can´t beat me in boardgames, but she excels at learning and getting better grades than I was ever capable of ... At least I can cook better than her. Now I feel manly !!
|
On July 04 2014 01:48 PyrionFlax wrote: [...] It’s like having an arm wrestling contest between a bear and a blueberry muffin. The muffin is fucked. The bear is gonna eat that muffin and then fuck its muffin girlfriend in the butt. Why subject me, the viewer, to that? (Although I can’t pretend I wouldn’t be curious about watching a bear fuck a muffin in the ass) [...]
Putting all your sarcarsm, witt and whatnot aside, I have two questions: Why do you use raping a woman as a form of punishment for the man? (of course woman and man being muffins in your case but that doesn't change the fact) Furthermore, why do you explicitly say it (read: she) is getting fucked in the ass? Is this some kind of extra punishment? Fucking someone in the ass? In general, fucking as a punishment, I mean, how sick can you be to do that? And why are you using these phrases in you blog. I don't understand you.
|
On July 06 2014 05:07 teddyoojo wrote: what sport would that be :O
Swimming, diving, most gymnastic sports, European football etc etc are all very competitive for both genders. I didn't mean to lie or imply the WNBA is ever going to have a sold out stadium, but if you compare real sports with "e-sports" it's still a massive difference. Women don't seem to enjoy training for video games (can't stay I blame them). Even the famous streamers who are female aren't very high rating and are mostly celebrated as entertainers.
|
On July 06 2014 03:51 Oakenshield wrote: On a serious note does anyone know what the highest solo queue MMR is for a woman? I've always found it interesting how uninterested most women are in trying to make video games a serious hobby even if they enjoy playing; while when it comes to real sports women make up some of the best athletes in the world.
Probably pretty high. There are enough players in Dota 2 that its not out of the question for at least 1 female player to be at 6k. Most of the women playing in the female dota 2 league are around 4k mmr +.
|
On July 06 2014 06:18 Artisreal wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2014 01:48 PyrionFlax wrote: [...] It’s like having an arm wrestling contest between a bear and a blueberry muffin. The muffin is fucked. The bear is gonna eat that muffin and then fuck its muffin girlfriend in the butt. Why subject me, the viewer, to that? (Although I can’t pretend I wouldn’t be curious about watching a bear fuck a muffin in the ass) [...]
Putting all your sarcarsm, witt and whatnot aside, I have two questions: Why do you use raping a woman as a form of punishment for the man? (of course woman and man being muffins in your case but that doesn't change the fact) Furthermore, why do you explicitly say it (read: she) is getting fucked in the ass? Is this some kind of extra punishment? Fucking someone in the ass? In general, fucking as a punishment, I mean, how sick can you be to do that? And why are you using these phrases in you blog. I don't understand you. Are you serious?
It's obvious that the muffins girlfriend would fuck the bear because the bear is more alpha than the muffin. Like when you see people on tv say 'ill beat you and steal your bitch'. And people have anal sex all the time, its not auto-rape.
|
On July 06 2014 18:41 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2014 06:18 Artisreal wrote:On July 04 2014 01:48 PyrionFlax wrote: [...] It’s like having an arm wrestling contest between a bear and a blueberry muffin. The muffin is fucked. The bear is gonna eat that muffin and then fuck its muffin girlfriend in the butt. Why subject me, the viewer, to that? (Although I can’t pretend I wouldn’t be curious about watching a bear fuck a muffin in the ass) [...]
Putting all your sarcarsm, witt and whatnot aside, I have two questions: Why do you use raping a woman as a form of punishment for the man? (of course woman and man being muffins in your case but that doesn't change the fact) Furthermore, why do you explicitly say it (read: she) is getting fucked in the ass? Is this some kind of extra punishment? Fucking someone in the ass? In general, fucking as a punishment, I mean, how sick can you be to do that? And why are you using these phrases in you blog. I don't understand you. Are you serious? It's obvious that the muffins girlfriend would fuck the bear because the bear is more alpha than the muffin. Like when you see people on tv say 'ill beat you and steal your bitch'. And people have anal sex all the time, its not auto-rape. You diddnt even read my post properly not gonna bother with the trolling (:
|
I tried to fuck a girl once, ended up she fucking me with her big dick and I hate girls ever since.
|
Just had the wife read this and she failed the sarcasm test, great article Pyrion
|
I knew a women who was better in maths than 90% of the men i know, including me.
Also: fun read, I laughed a lot. Waiting for some feminists to laugh even more.
|
On July 06 2014 21:10 Artisreal wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2014 18:41 zeo wrote:On July 06 2014 06:18 Artisreal wrote:On July 04 2014 01:48 PyrionFlax wrote: [...] It’s like having an arm wrestling contest between a bear and a blueberry muffin. The muffin is fucked. The bear is gonna eat that muffin and then fuck its muffin girlfriend in the butt. Why subject me, the viewer, to that? (Although I can’t pretend I wouldn’t be curious about watching a bear fuck a muffin in the ass) [...]
Putting all your sarcarsm, witt and whatnot aside, I have two questions: Why do you use raping a woman as a form of punishment for the man? (of course woman and man being muffins in your case but that doesn't change the fact) Furthermore, why do you explicitly say it (read: she) is getting fucked in the ass? Is this some kind of extra punishment? Fucking someone in the ass? In general, fucking as a punishment, I mean, how sick can you be to do that? And why are you using these phrases in you blog. I don't understand you. Are you serious? It's obvious that the muffins girlfriend would fuck the bear because the bear is more alpha than the muffin. Like when you see people on tv say 'ill beat you and steal your bitch'. And people have anal sex all the time, its not auto-rape. You diddnt even read my post properly not gonna bother with the trolling (:
Actually, he's contesting your assumption that the bears fucking of the muffin girlfriend in the butt is rape, when clearly it is sweet anal love occurring between consenting adults (or at least consenting bear and muffin). If taken in this light, it is clearly a punishment of the muffin boyfriend, not his muffin partner.
Also, I don't know if you are upset because Pyrion assumed that anal sex is punishment, which I think is a questionable assertion, or because you did, which is probably even worse. Anyways, it's satire, getting offended by the way it attacks offensive ideas is usually missing the point entirely. While the concepts used here, such as men using sex and control over women to assert their dominance over one another, are definitely offensive to feminist sensibilities, they are used to attack an idea that is much more insidious, that women cannot compete with men in a game that is not affected by the differences between the physical bodies of men and women (like how basketball or soccer might be), and, by extension, that women are intellectually inferior in some way to men. Besides, Pyrion is not condoning the ideas that he uses here, but in fact attacking them by illustrating how absurd they, and the things that they imply, are to someone thinking about it seriously.
I'm assuming that this is about the IeSL's decision to not allow women to compete against the field of men, or even in all the same games as men, giving the reason that they want to promote eSports as legitimate sports. Lol. There so many problems with this its not worth even going through them, but my favorite part of this is that they point to the fact that chess has separate male and female competitions to support them, where in fact chess has an "open to everyone" (called male by IeSL) competition and a female competition. Most women don't compete in the female pool, and in fact, the highest rated woman never has. I'm sure there's more controversy to it than what I've shown here within the chess community, but the fact that I was able to learn that by reading two Google search results demonstrates the integrity of the IeSL organization.
The last thing I want to say is that I think the Finish tournament should have allowed women to compete nonetheless. They claim to be against this kind of sexism in eSports, and yet they participate in it the same. Standing up for ideals concerning discrimination, even in examples that people may perceive as slight, requires some balls and the willingness to piss a few people off. Oh well, I suppose, it just seems like a missed opportunity.
|
On July 07 2014 06:29 Dr. Dumptruck wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2014 21:10 Artisreal wrote:On July 06 2014 18:41 zeo wrote:On July 06 2014 06:18 Artisreal wrote:On July 04 2014 01:48 PyrionFlax wrote: [...] It’s like having an arm wrestling contest between a bear and a blueberry muffin. The muffin is fucked. The bear is gonna eat that muffin and then fuck its muffin girlfriend in the butt. Why subject me, the viewer, to that? (Although I can’t pretend I wouldn’t be curious about watching a bear fuck a muffin in the ass) [...]
Putting all your sarcarsm, witt and whatnot aside, I have two questions: Why do you use raping a woman as a form of punishment for the man? (of course woman and man being muffins in your case but that doesn't change the fact) Furthermore, why do you explicitly say it (read: she) is getting fucked in the ass? Is this some kind of extra punishment? Fucking someone in the ass? In general, fucking as a punishment, I mean, how sick can you be to do that? And why are you using these phrases in you blog. I don't understand you. Are you serious? It's obvious that the muffins girlfriend would fuck the bear because the bear is more alpha than the muffin. Like when you see people on tv say 'ill beat you and steal your bitch'. And people have anal sex all the time, its not auto-rape. You diddnt even read my post properly not gonna bother with the trolling (: Actually, he's contesting your assumption that the bears fucking of the muffin girlfriend in the butt is rape, when clearly it is sweet anal love occurring between consenting adults (or at least consenting bear and muffin). If taken in this light, it is clearly a punishment of the muffin boyfriend, not his muffin partner. Also, I don't know if you are upset because Pyrion assumed that anal sex is punishment, which I think is a questionable assertion, or because you did, which is probably even worse. Anyways, it's satire, getting offended by the way it attacks offensive ideas is usually missing the point entirely. While the concepts used here, such as men using sex and control over women to assert their dominance over one another, are definitely offensive to feminist sensibilities, they are used to attack an idea that is much more insidious, that women cannot compete with men in a game that is not affected by the differences between the physical bodies of men and women (like how basketball or soccer might be), and, by extension, that women are intellectually inferior in some way to men. Besides, Pyrion is not condoning the ideas that he uses here, but in fact attacking them by illustrating how absurd they, and the things that they imply, are to someone thinking about it seriously. I'm assuming that this is about the IeSL's decision to not allow women to compete against the field of men, or even in all the same games as men, giving the reason that they want to promote eSports as legitimate sports. Lol. There so many problems with this its not worth even going through them, but my favorite part of this is that they point to the fact that chess has separate male and female competitions to support them, where in fact chess has an "open to everyone" (called male by IeSL) competition and a female competition. Most women don't compete in the female pool, and in fact, the highest rated woman never has. I'm sure there's more controversy to it than what I've shown here within the chess community, but the fact that I was able to learn that by reading two Google search results demonstrates the integrity of the IeSL organization. The last thing I want to say is that I think the Finish tournament should have allowed women to compete nonetheless. They claim to be against this kind of sexism in eSports, and yet they participate in it the same. Standing up for ideals concerning discrimination, even in examples that people may perceive as slight, requires some balls and the willingness to piss a few people off. Oh well, I suppose, it just seems like a missed opportunity.
Its good someone here understands what this is...
I'm probably more worried by some of these responses then what the actual tournament did in the first place.... o.O
|
France9034 Posts
That blog shows pretty well that Pyrion is an alpha male.
How can we contact the developers so they finally fix what's broken and release a final version?
On July 07 2014 10:05 AciD_DotA wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2014 06:29 Dr. Dumptruck wrote:On July 06 2014 21:10 Artisreal wrote:On July 06 2014 18:41 zeo wrote:On July 06 2014 06:18 Artisreal wrote:On July 04 2014 01:48 PyrionFlax wrote: [...] It’s like having an arm wrestling contest between a bear and a blueberry muffin. The muffin is fucked. The bear is gonna eat that muffin and then fuck its muffin girlfriend in the butt. Why subject me, the viewer, to that? (Although I can’t pretend I wouldn’t be curious about watching a bear fuck a muffin in the ass) [...]
Putting all your sarcarsm, witt and whatnot aside, I have two questions: Why do you use raping a woman as a form of punishment for the man? (of course woman and man being muffins in your case but that doesn't change the fact) Furthermore, why do you explicitly say it (read: she) is getting fucked in the ass? Is this some kind of extra punishment? Fucking someone in the ass? In general, fucking as a punishment, I mean, how sick can you be to do that? And why are you using these phrases in you blog. I don't understand you. Are you serious? It's obvious that the muffins girlfriend would fuck the bear because the bear is more alpha than the muffin. Like when you see people on tv say 'ill beat you and steal your bitch'. And people have anal sex all the time, its not auto-rape. You diddnt even read my post properly not gonna bother with the trolling (: Actually, he's contesting your assumption that the bears fucking of the muffin girlfriend in the butt is rape, when clearly it is sweet anal love occurring between consenting adults (or at least consenting bear and muffin). If taken in this light, it is clearly a punishment of the muffin boyfriend, not his muffin partner. Also, I don't know if you are upset because Pyrion assumed that anal sex is punishment, which I think is a questionable assertion, or because you did, which is probably even worse. Anyways, it's satire, getting offended by the way it attacks offensive ideas is usually missing the point entirely. While the concepts used here, such as men using sex and control over women to assert their dominance over one another, are definitely offensive to feminist sensibilities, they are used to attack an idea that is much more insidious, that women cannot compete with men in a game that is not affected by the differences between the physical bodies of men and women (like how basketball or soccer might be), and, by extension, that women are intellectually inferior in some way to men. Besides, Pyrion is not condoning the ideas that he uses here, but in fact attacking them by illustrating how absurd they, and the things that they imply, are to someone thinking about it seriously. I'm assuming that this is about the IeSL's decision to not allow women to compete against the field of men, or even in all the same games as men, giving the reason that they want to promote eSports as legitimate sports. Lol. There so many problems with this its not worth even going through them, but my favorite part of this is that they point to the fact that chess has separate male and female competitions to support them, where in fact chess has an "open to everyone" (called male by IeSL) competition and a female competition. Most women don't compete in the female pool, and in fact, the highest rated woman never has. I'm sure there's more controversy to it than what I've shown here within the chess community, but the fact that I was able to learn that by reading two Google search results demonstrates the integrity of the IeSL organization. The last thing I want to say is that I think the Finish tournament should have allowed women to compete nonetheless. They claim to be against this kind of sexism in eSports, and yet they participate in it the same. Standing up for ideals concerning discrimination, even in examples that people may perceive as slight, requires some balls and the willingness to piss a few people off. Oh well, I suppose, it just seems like a missed opportunity. Its good someone here understands what this is... I'm probably more worried by some of these responses then what the actual tournament did in the first place.... o.O
I'm actually happy that you're worried about that, and that makes me less worried about these responses! :D
|
On July 06 2014 06:31 Oakenshield wrote:Swimming, diving, most gymnastic sports, European football etc etc are all very competitive for both genders. I didn't mean to lie or imply the WNBA is ever going to have a sold out stadium, but if you compare real sports with "e-sports" it's still a massive difference. Women don't seem to enjoy training for video games (can't stay I blame them). Even the famous streamers who are female aren't very high rating and are mostly celebrated as entertainers.
Yeah, no, you have no clue.
|
On July 08 2014 10:12 Steveling wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2014 06:31 Oakenshield wrote:On July 06 2014 05:07 teddyoojo wrote: what sport would that be :O Swimming, diving, most gymnastic sports, European football etc etc are all very competitive for both genders. I didn't mean to lie or imply the WNBA is ever going to have a sold out stadium, but if you compare real sports with "e-sports" it's still a massive difference. Women don't seem to enjoy training for video games (can't stay I blame them). Even the famous streamers who are female aren't very high rating and are mostly celebrated as entertainers. Yeah, no, you have no clue.
Afaik in the US womans Football is actually a thing... Not like anyone anywhere else in the world cares about it.
|
On July 09 2014 00:02 Velr wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2014 10:12 Steveling wrote:On July 06 2014 06:31 Oakenshield wrote:On July 06 2014 05:07 teddyoojo wrote: what sport would that be :O Swimming, diving, most gymnastic sports, European football etc etc are all very competitive for both genders. I didn't mean to lie or imply the WNBA is ever going to have a sold out stadium, but if you compare real sports with "e-sports" it's still a massive difference. Women don't seem to enjoy training for video games (can't stay I blame them). Even the famous streamers who are female aren't very high rating and are mostly celebrated as entertainers. Yeah, no, you have no clue. Afaik in the US womans Football is actually a thing... Not like anyone anywhere else in the world cares about it. lol soccer
|
On July 08 2014 10:12 Steveling wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2014 06:31 Oakenshield wrote:On July 06 2014 05:07 teddyoojo wrote: what sport would that be :O Swimming, diving, most gymnastic sports, European football etc etc are all very competitive for both genders. I didn't mean to lie or imply the WNBA is ever going to have a sold out stadium, but if you compare real sports with "e-sports" it's still a massive difference. Women don't seem to enjoy training for video games (can't stay I blame them). Even the famous streamers who are female aren't very high rating and are mostly celebrated as entertainers. Yeah, no, you have no clue.
Lol. The point is that women compete at many sports at an equally as high level as men do. In gaming they don't, not against each other, nor against men. There being no physical barrier to entry for female competitors, this is probably due to the social factors that effect female gamers.
In response to the original post, its seems pretty obvious to me that the way the community treats its female members is the root of the problem, and that this fiasco with the IeSL is just a result of this mentality.
|
On July 04 2014 01:56 Hot_Bid wrote: i lost to a girl in the mile once in high school she ran a 5:30 wtf Well, no shame in that then.
|
|
|
|