|
A lot of people have been giving Bob Costas some heat recently for the comments he made during Sunday Night Football, in which he interrupted his half-time coverage to talk about guns. The most quoted statement is this:
"If Jovan Belcher didn't possess a gun, he and Kasandra Perkins would both be alive today."
The comments have gotten a lot of coverage in the media, on talk shows, on talk radio... Most people seem to think it was just bizarre to start talking about gun policy during the middle of a football game, and believe sports and politics should not mingle. A few have expressed much anger and even called for his firing, but he is unlikely to be fired for these comments. Still, these comments have attracted a lot of negative publicity, and a lot of unnecessary controversy.
Now, I just want to ask if Bob Costas should really be held responsible for these remarks or not. Why do we immediately jump to blaming this one person, when clearly there are other actors involved? I would argue he is not responsible for any of this, that there is another entity to blame: His microphone. No one has yet considered if maybe the microphone was to blame in this whole controversy. If the microphone wasn't there or wasn't turned on, it would not have captured his remarks, and there would be no knowledge of any of this. His comments would have caused no harm at all if there wasn't a microphone in front of him broadcasting them to the world. So maybe we should be asking why Bob Costas was given a turned on microphone instead of criticizing him or questioning his comments themselves?
This fact is clear: If Bob Costas did not have a microphone in that building, none of this controversy would have occured.
This is not the first time microphones have caused harm in someone's life. I'm sure you can think of examples yourself, when a turned on microphone caused immense controversy or even pain, emotional, financial, or otherwise. It could result in losing your job, being publicly ostracized, ending your marriage, anything. Clearly microphones need to be handled with great care. To ensure they are handled with care, we should consider granting permits for their use, so that only prepared and trained professionals could use them. We shouldn't allow just anyone to use microphones in any setting, there should be some controls in place to prevent these sort of events from repeating themselves into the future.
I know people are going to bring up the First Amendment, which guarantees things like freedom of speech. But it is obvious the founding fathers never intended any of this to occur. Microphones didn't even exist when that law was written, they probably could not have even foreseen something like a microphone coming into existence. And so their perspective was not rooted in modern conditions, and I'm sure many of them would have clarified the first amendment if they realized the consequences it would have in the modern world. They were just backward farmers, and it is clear they did not intend the law to be used the way we now understand it.
If that microphone had not been in that building, none of this would have happened. Bob Costas is not to blame, the microphone is to blame. And we as a society are to blame, for allowing a microphone to be turned on and placed in front of him.
 
|
I think it's silly to blame it on the microphone, personally.
It's not the gun's fault if I go on a rampage, it's just an inanimate object. and with that microphone comes responsibility, which he should've known by now, you can't just say anything that comes on your mind during a broadcast, especially a talk about guns at a football event. It's his fault only for the controversy he caused, and of the people who put him there in the first place.
By his statement he wished to do nothing but create even more controversy (hey it's not the man's fault it's the damn GOVERNMENT) and he was, or should've been conscious about that when he made it
I just hope I'm not being romanian again and fallen into another trap blog, I'm bad at getting jokes, so sorry if it's that
|
|
|
My heritage has caught up to me again. Oh well
hey at least I caught it this time, it's getting better
|
This blog, particularly the first comment, made me happy. Haha.
|
On December 05 2012 03:44 m3rciless wrote:
HAHAHAHA SO ROMANIAN
LOL
Also, @ OP, I give Costas a lot of latitude because he looks like Mark Hamill, and Luke Skywalker is much more wise than I.
I really liked your writeup though 
|
if his brain wasnt destroyed by years of playing a "sport" meant for neanderthals then he wouldnt have used the gun that he is legally allowed to possess.
fuck you bob costas. not that i would expect a slimeball like him to criticize that which pays his bills.
how many people have to die before parents stop letting their kids play this? at least nfl players get paid to do it if they want to
rip junior seau
|
Yes! My blog hit Romanian pay dirt! JACKPOT!
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
Well, not everyone is given a microphone on national tv. Microphone control is a good thing, it's just that this time microphone control failed to filter out guys like Bob Costas.
|
hahahahahahaha man too good.
|
Hehe, time to make registration for microphone-use necessary!!
|
On December 05 2012 05:17 jdseemoreglass wrote:Yes! My blog hit Romanian pay dirt! JACKPOT!
"How to bait and catch a Romanian in international Internet waters."
|
wow the romanian
this blog would have been terrible otherwise
|
This blog is infinitely better than what I thought it would be. 5/5 for satire and Romanian
|
|
|
|
|
On December 05 2012 03:37 Incze wrote:
I think it's silly to blame it on the microphone, personally.
It's not the gun's fault if I go on a rampage, it's just an inanimate object. and with that microphone comes responsibility, which he should've known by now, you can't just say anything that comes on your mind during a broadcast, especially a talk about guns at a football event. It's his fault only for the controversy he caused, and of the people who put him there in the first place.
By his statement he wished to do nothing but create even more controversy (hey it's not the man's fault it's the damn GOVERNMENT) and he was, or should've been conscious about that when he made it
I just hope I'm not being romanian again and fallen into another trap blog, I'm bad at getting jokes, so sorry if it's that
On December 05 2012 03:44 m3rciless wrote:
HAHAHAHA SO ROMANIAN
This is too funny. X-D
It's not the Romanian's fault. It's the keyboard he's using. If his keyboard wasn't there, this comment never would have been posted. 
|
On December 05 2012 07:48 cLAN.Anax wrote:Show nested quote +On December 05 2012 03:37 Incze wrote:
I think it's silly to blame it on the microphone, personally.
It's not the gun's fault if I go on a rampage, it's just an inanimate object. and with that microphone comes responsibility, which he should've known by now, you can't just say anything that comes on your mind during a broadcast, especially a talk about guns at a football event. It's his fault only for the controversy he caused, and of the people who put him there in the first place.
By his statement he wished to do nothing but create even more controversy (hey it's not the man's fault it's the damn GOVERNMENT) and he was, or should've been conscious about that when he made it
I just hope I'm not being romanian again and fallen into another trap blog, I'm bad at getting jokes, so sorry if it's that This is too funny. X-D It's not the Romanian's fault. It's the keyboard he's using. If his keyboard wasn't there, this comment never would have been posted.
Damnit, I wish I'd thought of this! Well played, sir.
|
LOL. I love how the Romanian has being the famous part of this blog . I hope he comes back to comment on this, but maybe he's too embarrassed.
Its okay, Mr. Romania. We need people like you in the world, it makes things more exciting! I'm sure if everyone could they would give you a hug and pat you on the back.
|
I get the joke but Costas is a moron who shouldn't be allowed to talk regardless, I agree the microphone shouldn't be there because of that  .
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
