Revenge of the Naniwa Probe Art - Page 5
Blogs > alteredclone |
davidohx
United States114 Posts
| ||
PUPATREE
340 Posts
| ||
dartoo
India2889 Posts
Angry probes? Trying to topple the gom house? :D | ||
itkovian
United States1763 Posts
| ||
LEEKsc
Sweden380 Posts
| ||
MDMA_
Canada265 Posts
| ||
LastDance
New Zealand510 Posts
| ||
TheRealPaciFist
United States1049 Posts
| ||
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
| ||
Ciraxis
Australia400 Posts
| ||
epb1982
29 Posts
It seems that ppl from the organisation dont want to talk about this, BUT can you pls ask this? GOMtv: do you agree that the specific match-up didn't have anything on stake? draining the spirit of real pro's that want to win the whole thing? do you, from now on, dont create delusive match-ups in any of your future tourney's? If yes, are you willing to say sorry to NaniWa for your mistake in the Blizzard Cup? If no, why do think that the games/professional want to see these delusive matches? Hope you can get it out there, I think GOMtv has to do some reputation-damage control, b/c ATM i noticed A LOT of ppl not going to GOM ever again (including me). Other tourney are more relaxed for us to see ATM. Just my thought, what it's worth (read my othe posts for my opinion on this matter) | ||
FMStyles
Germany162 Posts
Tried to adjust it a bit to make it look more like a wallpaper(tell me, if you don't want it to be here): (SKorean Flag at the back and in the big O from the Gom logo, sharingan in the probe "eye", still looks abit unclean at the edges tho') | ||
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
On December 26 2011 19:26 epb1982 wrote: Nice alteredclone, this pic gives suits what happened, I agree that this isn't over until GOMtv gives a statement for future tourney's, now we don't know if this is going to happen again, whether or nor the same penalty will be given, eg Idra vs oGsMC, both are at high risk for unconventional behavior. It seems that ppl from the organisation dont want to talk about this, BUT can you pls ask this? GOMtv: do you agree that the specific match-up didn't have anything on stake? draining the spirit of real pro's that want to win the whole thing? do you, from now on, dont create delusive match-ups in any of your future tourney's? If yes, are you willing to say sorry to NaniWa for your mistake in the Blizzard Cup? If no, why do think that the games/professional want to see these delusive matches? Hope you can get it out there, I think GOMtv has to do some reputation-damage control, b/c ATM i noticed A LOT of ppl not going to GOM ever again (including me). Other tourney are more relaxed for us to see ATM. Just my thought, what it's worth (read my othe posts for my opinion on this matter) Sigh... I hate to touch this subject, but Naniwa agreed to the format the moment he entered the tournament. If he dislikes this type of format, he should have rejected the invite. It doesn't matter whether something was at stake or not. It's okay to dislike the format. It's not okay to do it the way Nani did. Round robin is a perfectly suitable format used everywhere in the world. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing a different format, but that's completely irrelevant to this situation. | ||
Silentness
United States2821 Posts
On December 25 2011 22:37 Necosarius wrote: Looks awesome :D Reminds me of Gaara somehow O.o haha I thought the exact same thing. The quantic symbol looks like something out of Naruto. Also Naniwa looks similar to Gaara in that picture. PS: The probe in his hand looks like one of those ninja stars from Naruto as well... | ||
jarrydesque
584 Posts
| ||
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
| ||
Count9
China10928 Posts
| ||
MaBe
United States97 Posts
| ||
Elem
Sweden4717 Posts
| ||
epb1982
29 Posts
It's okay to dislike the format. It's not okay to do it the way Nani did. Round robin is a perfectly suitable format used everywhere in the world. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing a different format, but that's completely irrelevant to this situation.'' Bla Bla, official contract, bla bla, he agreed to the format, bla bla, unproffesional attitude. Why can't GOM just consult the ''rules of the contract/anti-cheat rules''? before rejecting futher participation on code S? The type of format was highly unconventional, I never saw the format in SC2 tourney's. And now I know why! You defend the ppl in charge of the format plus think that the last word has been spoken about this subject, both I think are ignorant. I hate to touch this subject, but mordk seems like a good guy on other topics then this one. | ||
| ||