EPTAlso, I speak french fairly well, he admitted he's the driver, and the sound was from his Ferrari, if no one told you yet.
All in all, very cool, will be sure to read in the future.
XIX - Page 7
| Blogs > JWD |
|
Sachem
United States116 Posts
Also, I speak french fairly well, he admitted he's the driver, and the sound was from his Ferrari, if no one told you yet. All in all, very cool, will be sure to read in the future. | ||
|
Mashes
Canada441 Posts
| ||
|
Fr33t
United States1128 Posts
 | ||
|
prosatan
Romania7905 Posts
Awesome as always! | ||
|
gamecrazy
United States421 Posts
| ||
|
SkatesSC
United States191 Posts
| ||
|
Djabanete
United States2786 Posts
| ||
|
deroth
United States83 Posts
| ||
|
GreatFall
United States1061 Posts
| ||
|
Furycrab
Canada456 Posts
On July 30 2011 03:06 deroth wrote: The most disgusting part of the video in #8 is that the number of likes/dislikes for it on youtube. Somehow the ratio of people who find this cool to people who find it revolting is 50:1, i wonder what the ratio would be if those 500 people saw somebody they know/like/value crossing the street in that video. What if that video was salvaged from a camera of a ridiculous accident involving pedestrians or another vehicle? I think it's an interesting video, but I don't think it's a cool video unless someone somehow came up and said it was all fake and somehow he was really rolling at the speed limit the whole time. | ||
|
duBstar
United States57 Posts
| ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On August 01 2011 00:05 duBstar wrote: Oh man I used to follow these so much. I've never commented but felt it was necessary now. Thanks these really are awesome. used to? the series is ongoing! | ||
|
cascades
Singapore6122 Posts
| ||
|
intoyourrainbOW
United States168 Posts
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
jambam
United States324 Posts
On August 02 2011 01:52 intoyourrainbOW wrote: wow, can everyone stop riding this guy's dick? i admit i like his musical tastes, but who died and made this guy TL's resident hipster/fashionista? User was temp banned for this post. Don't resist it. you love him too <3. JWD is a boss. His blog's are one of the reason's i come to Tl every day. My only complaint is that we don't see them very often! I still remember seeing my first JWD blog. Let's be honest with ourselves, the girls are usually the best part. But I'm always amazed at the things you find on the internet. If i was only allowed to go one place on the internet, it would be JWD's blogs. He finds the best the internet has to offer. | ||
|
Oldgrain
Finland165 Posts
On July 28 2011 02:22 Oldgrain wrote: I sent hasbro an email asking for a ruling on the monopoly rules. + Show Spoiler + Dear Sir or Madam of Hasbro customer service. I am a member on a forum called TeamLiquid (http://www.teamliquid.net) and in a recent forum thread (http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=248123) the rules of monopoly emerged and of course being the internet, everyone had their own stand on the rules. So here is the problem. When you pick up a chance card with the "Advance token to the nearest Railroad and pay owner twice the rental to which he is otherwise entitles. If railroad is unowned, you may buy it from the bank." you can understand the task in two different ways: 1) This card requires the drawing player to advance to the railroad that is the fewest spaces from the plays. In other words if I land on the chance on a light blue street I must go around the board (and collect $200) to Reading Railroad which is 2 spaces behind where I drew the card. 2) The card requires the drawing player to advance to the railroad that is the fewest spaces in front of the player. So if I land on the chance on the same light blue street I advance eight spaces to Pennsylvania Railroad (and don't pass go). At the moment alternative 2 is winnig with 88% of the votes. In the forum thread there are quite a few good reasonings to both alternatives: "On a Monopoly board distance can only be measured going the correct way around the board, so Reading RR is actually 38 spaces away, not 2. That woud make it "nearest" (how could Pennsylvania be further, when you only have to move 8 spaces to get there?)." "of course 1 is the correct reading. here's my thinking. the essential question is: "which railroad is 'the nearest'?" and there is no winning argument that a railroad 8 spots away from my piece is (ever) nearer to my piece than a railroad 2 spots away. no, it's not dispositive that the card instructs you to "advance". it's common in Monopoly to advance all the way around the board to get to your destination (ever draw "advance to GO" from Blue Street chance spot? the rules specify that you must go all the way around the board, collecting $200). and as a general principle, directionality is generally irrelevant to nearness — especially on a flat game board where every move is instantaneous." Could you experts of board games please enlighten us, experts of StarCraft2, on how the chance card should be interpreted. Thank you for your help. Best Regards Seems that Hasbro isn't going to answer  | ||
|
Oldgrain
Finland165 Posts
Hasbro finally answered. Thanks for your email, which I have checked with our design team. They agree that the rule should be interpreted as NEXT railroad as you move forward on the board not nearest in terms of spaces. We will look into changing the wording in the chance card to make this more clear when playing and avoid unnecessary confusion. "ADVANCE TO THE NEXT RAILROAD. If UNOWNED, you may buy it from the Bank. If OWNED, pay owner twice the rental to which they are otherwise entitled." Hope this explanation helps. Can't wait to see this changed in the game itself. I have made my mark on history. Thanks to JWD for that one I guess! | ||
|
bonifaceviii
Canada2890 Posts
| ||
|
JWD
United States12607 Posts
| ||
|
Pengtoss
207 Posts
Actually played a massive role in the immortal game of monopoly. | ||
| ||
