• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 11:06
CET 17:06
KST 01:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 100SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1819Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises2Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !11
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Starcraft 2 Zerg Coach ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship WardiTV Mondays $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play
Brood War
General
StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone I would like to say something about StarCraft BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ (UMS) SWITCHEROO *New* /Destination Edit/
Tourneys
SLON Grand Finals – Season 2 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Elden Ring Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI 12 Days of Starcraft
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1011 users

Good quality affordable mechanical watches

Blogs > lixlix
Post a Reply
Normal
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-13 04:43:57
August 13 2010 03:23 GMT
#1
I have recently developed a love of watches as you can see from my entry here

high end watches

Since that entry dealt with ultra high end watches that are pretty much unattainable, this entry will deal with some reasonably priced, high quality mechanical watches from some companies that might not be super well known.

Recently I have been getting in to pilot style watches.

In particular I am looking in to getting a Prometheus recon 5
[image loading]

with a Swiss Unitas 6497 movement

[image loading]

This watch retails for about 250 to 300 Euros depending on whether you have to pay the VAT tax.

Considering that good quality quartz watches will run you about the same amount, I think its a fantastic value for a mechanical watch with a trusted swiss movement.

lac29
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1485 Posts
August 13 2010 03:54 GMT
#2
I like it. It's very clean and readable like a fortis or jorg gray.
micronesia
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States24751 Posts
August 13 2010 04:20 GMT
#3
Can you please add a little bit more? All you seem to have done is mention what you are going to be interested in and then post a picture of 1 watch... not enough content by itself to warrant its own blog.
ModeratorThere are animal crackers for people and there are people crackers for animals.
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-13 04:49:44
August 13 2010 04:42 GMT
#4
oh I thought I could put everything in to separate posts. I was going to do 1 company per post.

another company I like is Steinhart, especially their NavB uhr line. though certain versions of this line will run up to about 700 euros which starts getting kind of expensive.

[image loading]

Its important to know that most watch houses do not make their own movements.

They buy the movements from a select few houses (less than 10 I believe) that do make their own movements.

So when researching in to buying a watch, its important to find out the type of movement the watch has and research in to the reliability of that movement.

lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
August 13 2010 05:03 GMT
#5
Also, there are a lot of lesser known watch companies that have good workmanship and movements but stylistically are homages to more famous higher end brands.

I typically try to go more for houses with a more original look but some of these brands can be a good alternative if you must have a certain style.

A good example is Debaufre. Great movements and craftmanship but stylistically their watches resemble other high end brands.

[image loading]

This watch resembles a Bell and Ross

while this one

[image loading]

resembles a Rolex Submariner.
ella_guru
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada1741 Posts
August 13 2010 05:05 GMT
#6
I find these to be extremely expensive . Sundial is cheaper : P
Each day gets better : )
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
August 14 2010 02:44 GMT
#7
Now those watches I listed above are all $350 dollars +. While affordable, I wouldn't call them cheap.

If that is still too much, there are a few other options for good mechanical watches.

Sea Gull has some very nice watches that start out at around $100 and go up to $400.

They have their own in house movement but it is a Chinese movement. Its actually a fairly high quality movement but doesn't carry the Swiss badge.

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-15 02:22:52
August 14 2010 02:49 GMT
#8
Invicta is another company that has some good quality watches but stylistically, I find their watches to resemble other brands too much. I can't even call them homages anymore as they look like exact copies.

here's the invicta
[image loading]

here's the rolex
[image loading]


Did I mention the submariner (AKA the Savior watch) is copied super frequently?
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
August 14 2010 03:28 GMT
#9
If you like a dive style watch like the submariner, but not something that looks like an exact copy, the Orient Mako can be a good choice.

Orient is a Japanese watch house that has been around since 1950 and makes their own in house movements and turn out some affordable good quality mechanical watches. ($100 to $250)

In particular, their Mako model has been a good seller

[image loading]

[image loading]

for a more sporty look, the orange Mako on a rubber strap looks pretty good to me too
[image loading]
asianskill
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States289 Posts
August 14 2010 03:46 GMT
#10
wow i appreciate watches so much more now
herrro
kakaman
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States1576 Posts
August 14 2010 03:48 GMT
#11
dude...Seiko 5, you can never go wrong with that!

[image loading]
lac29
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1485 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-14 03:55:05
August 14 2010 03:53 GMT
#12
I got my brother a Hamilton Khaki a few years ago:

[image loading]
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-14 03:58:59
August 14 2010 03:58 GMT
#13
Yup the Seiko 5 is great. Even though most Seiko watches on the market are quartz now, they make some good automatics.

[image loading]


Automatics mean mechanical watches that are wound by natural movements of the wearer's arm.

In this case, the 5 in the Seiko 5 refer to

1. automatic 2. water resistant 3. shock resistant 4. date 5. day

lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-14 04:05:44
August 14 2010 04:03 GMT
#14
On August 14 2010 12:53 lac29 wrote:
I got my brother a Hamilton Khaki a few years ago:

[image loading]


very nice watch. Hamilton is a very nice brand of watches.

They tend to be a bit more higher class than the watches I've listed but they are still more affordable than a IWC, Rolex, Panerai.

I really like some of their Jazzmaster watches though they are a bit outside my budget.

ThePurist
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada686 Posts
August 14 2010 04:44 GMT
#15
Hello~

I'm really into haute horologerie and I consider myself to know a bit more than the average Joe. I hope you re-considering purchasing a mechanical watch at a price point below $1000 US. I'm all for lower-end watches but it is in my opinion that anything below $1000 isn't really a quality mechanical watch and perhaps it would be in your best interest to save for now and when the time comes you can purchase something that will last you a lifetime.

Some opinions regarding the opinions posted above:

1. Seiko does make great watches, matter fact just as good as Swiss-made watches in terms of time-keeping/accuracy and are priced usually 100s below the price-point of the competitors model. However, in terms of automatic movements, Seiko is very lacking in their entry/mid level movements are usually even the ETA/Valjoux base, modified movements are superior. Seiko's flagship models pretty much carry the brand. Thus, their quartz and high-end gets a thumbs up and for their entry/mid I give them a thumbs down.

2. Any self-respecting watch house will not copy a design of another watchmaker and produce them. It's really a shame.

3. Invicta makes terrible watches. Do not purchase. If you really want one you can find them in outlet malls for super cheap. Hamilton is really just an more expensive Swatch watch.

4. Orient would be a good purchase in terms of price-point in relation to quality. Not too many people know about Orient I'm surprised it was even mentioned.

My 2cents: Save your money, till you have around 2/3/4000 and then purchase a mid-priced watch at that price point. It'll last you a lifetime and buying a lower-end watch and saving up again for a nicer upgrade will just be a hassle and you will end up having a cheap watch that you won't wear. (This is from my personal experience)

GL


T0fuuu
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia2275 Posts
August 14 2010 06:22 GMT
#16
you guys know that a 10 dollar quartz is more accurate than any of these hundred dollar watches right? You are only buying the design and the quality. The accuracy part is bullshit.
ThePurist
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada686 Posts
August 14 2010 06:36 GMT
#17
Yes quartz movements are more accurate than mechanical watches. But, you are wrong about buying the design and quality. It is more about appreciating fine craftsmanship and a sense of a personified watch. It is 'alive' so to speak, if it an automatic it will wind with your arm movements. Furthermore, mechanical watches have complications which add to the complex nature of the watches.

In terms of accuracy, as long as you maintain your watch most mechanical watches will be accurate and be off by a few seconds per time period depending on it's movement/other climate factors/usage and so on.

Why buy a Rolls Royce when a Suzuki does the same job?
T0fuuu
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia2275 Posts
August 14 2010 07:11 GMT
#18
was design and quality hard to understand? Im not gonna argue there isnt craftsmanship involved. Its just that theres iffy movements even in 5k watchess, which are also ridiculously expensive to service because of the need to reseal and retest the watch. Mechanical watches are great accessories. But a few seconds off is optimistic of their timekeeping ability.

Anyways if its for daily wear, have to reccommend seiko. Bullteproof.
ThePurist
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada686 Posts
August 14 2010 09:52 GMT
#19
Quality = reliability of a watch and the watch performing it's intended functions. Quartz > Mechanical
Design = aesthetic appeal. Quartz watches are more diverse in design > Mechanical that usually follow set bezel shapes such as the tonneau.

It wasn't that hard to understand and I don't stand corrected in my previous statement.
Zlasher
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States9129 Posts
August 14 2010 17:11 GMT
#20
Man these watches look hot, I don't care about the time if I want accurate time I'll look at my cell phone but man, I just LOVE the look of those open end watches where you can see the gears and shit, if anyone could link me to a site where I could get cheap ones, even fake ones or whatever that just have that type of look of open moving gears, with a decent stylish look hit me up
Follow me: www.twitter.com/zlasher
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
August 15 2010 01:51 GMT
#21
On August 15 2010 02:11 ZlaSHeR wrote:
Man these watches look hot, I don't care about the time if I want accurate time I'll look at my cell phone but man, I just LOVE the look of those open end watches where you can see the gears and shit, if anyone could link me to a site where I could get cheap ones, even fake ones or whatever that just have that type of look of open moving gears, with a decent stylish look hit me up



what price range are you looking for?
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-15 02:24:01
August 15 2010 02:08 GMT
#22
I agree with ThePurist on the spirit of his post but disagree on several points. while I know where he is coming from, I think for most people, a $1000 entry point is too steep especially for their first mechanical watch.Its also a rather arbitrary number. I find nothing wrong with buying a $200 mechanical watch that might not have super precision but will also work for quite a few years.

Also while Hamilton is owned by the swatch group, so is Breguet, Glaschutte and nobody would call those glorified Swatches. Not saying Hamilton is on the same level as Breguet or Glaschutte but calling it a glorified Swatch is a bit of an oversimplification.

I'm not a huge fan of Invicta either but I've heard some good reviews on their reliability.

Malgrif
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada1095 Posts
August 15 2010 02:11 GMT
#23
arent digital watches more accurate???
for there to be pro there has to be noob.
lac29
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1485 Posts
August 15 2010 02:12 GMT
#24
On August 15 2010 11:11 Malgrif wrote:
arent digital watches more accurate???


Yes.
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
August 15 2010 02:15 GMT
#25
the question of digital vs mechanical is kind of like saying "why get a painting of yourself if photos are more accurate" ?

If you think of a watch purely as a tool then yes by all means go digital but there is a certain beauty and art to the workings of a mechanical watch.
ThePurist
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada686 Posts
August 15 2010 05:01 GMT
#26
On August 15 2010 11:15 lixlix wrote:
the question of digital vs mechanical is kind of like saying "why get a painting of yourself if photos are more accurate" ?

If you think of a watch purely as a tool then yes by all means go digital but there is a certain beauty and art to the workings of a mechanical watch.


Well said man, I gave the "why get a Rolls Royce when you can buy a Suzuki to do the same thing" example previously lol.

Keep in mind my posts before are just my opinions but they aren't based off nothing. In the end I feel saving for a mid-tier watch would be good that's all. Lemme know what you decide to get though~ if you do get something, I'd love to hear about it.
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-15 05:26:23
August 15 2010 05:15 GMT
#27
Well I think if you are looking at watches that last a lifetime, then saving up for a mid tier watch is a good idea.

But I think a lot of people want to get in to mechanical watches but aren't sure exactly what they like (automatic vs hand wound, chronograph/no chronograph, diver or pilot or dress watch) etc... and so coming in at a high price point might be somewhat daunting. But I definitely like your input.

I think I will also make a future blog post about mid tier watches I like if there is enough interest.

Currently I'm also considering shelling out a bit more and getting this

http://www.german-watches.com/cgi-bin/lshop.cgi?action=showdetail&wkid=11616&ls=e&nc=1281849795-13041&rubnum=marine&artnum=marineoriginalarabischschwarz&file=&gesamt_zeilen=Tshowrub--marine

[image loading]
Zlasher
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States9129 Posts
August 15 2010 05:41 GMT
#28
On August 15 2010 10:51 lixlix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2010 02:11 ZlaSHeR wrote:
Man these watches look hot, I don't care about the time if I want accurate time I'll look at my cell phone but man, I just LOVE the look of those open end watches where you can see the gears and shit, if anyone could link me to a site where I could get cheap ones, even fake ones or whatever that just have that type of look of open moving gears, with a decent stylish look hit me up



what price range are you looking for?


Cheap XD under 100 lol, something that looks like these, the skeleton look. I don't really care about its timekeeping ability whatsoever, if I have to adjust the time every month big deal lol, I just like the look of moving gears, an all black finish, etc. That Hublot Bigger Bang video just looks so cool, if there were a fake version of that, that was cheap I'd be all over it lol. If I want to know the time I'll look at my cell phone which is satellite corrected timing haha, But if I want something that'll just look classy as hell and help accessorize with the other stuff I wear, these are just awesome.
Follow me: www.twitter.com/zlasher
lac29
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1485 Posts
August 15 2010 17:57 GMT
#29
Imo, it'll be pretty hard to find a nice looking skeleton mechanical watch for under $100.
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-16 07:00:01
August 15 2010 19:44 GMT
#30
well I don't think you'll get anything that looks or moves like the Hublot Bigger Bang since that one has a tourbillon (the rapidly spinning thing at the bottom) and is something ridiculous like $300,000+.

If you want a skeleton watch for cheap I think your best bet is a Seagull or something else with a Chinese movement. Seagull just happens to have one of the better Chinese movements.Some Parnis watches uses seagull movements but others use even more inferior movements.

http://www.usseagull.com/production.asp?cid=7&pid=23

http://www.manbushijie.com/productshow-397-2.html

If you must must have a tourbillon, even a watch with a Chinese tourbillon will run you minimum $500.

If you must have a replica skeleton Hublot style, then look for a Hublot Aero Bang replica (no tourbillon).

You are looking at $200 to $600 depending on the quality of the replica.

Here is another cheap skeletonized watch

http://www.overstock.com/Jewelry-Watches/Stuhrling-Original-Mens-Othello-Skeleton-Automatic-Watch/4692564/product.html
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-18 14:45:12
August 18 2010 14:39 GMT
#31
A fairly good guide on what to look for when purchasing watches in the $300 to $1000 range

http://ablogtoread.com/watch-talk/top-things-to-look-for-in-a-luxury-watch-part-1-entry-level-luxury/

$1000 to $20,000 range

http://ablogtoread.com/watch-talk/top-things-to-look-for-in-a-luxury-watch-part-2-medium-range-luxury/

and $20,000+

http://ablogtoread.com/watch-talk/top-things-to-look-for-in-a-luxury-watch-part-3-high-end-luxury/

citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
August 18 2010 15:34 GMT
#32
The disappointing thing is that even mechanical watches you pay a good deal of money for will have problems. About 10 years ago my father bought the IWC Portugese and loved it for the first two or three years. Then it started to break down every year or so. They always repair it, but it's frustrating to have to go through that process so many times. The self-winding mechanism is what gets screwed up quite frequently it seems.

So I'd be a bit skeptical of the claim these are investments which are worth it since they are "lifetime purchases". They can easily turn into expensive headaches.

I am quite happy with my Tissot and would recommend the brand: same exact mechanism as Omega at a lower price point. If you find a design you like, it's a good deal.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
August 18 2010 16:13 GMT
#33
I think the key thing to keep in mind is buy a watch for yourself. Don't let anybody tell you what you should or shouldn't buy.

If you like the reliability of quartz, go quartz. If there is something about mechanical watches that attract you then buy that.

We all place different values in to how much we are willing to spend for something, whether it be a car, a watch, food, clothes, etc...

In the end, buy something that makes you happy.
snowbird
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Germany2044 Posts
August 18 2010 16:18 GMT
#34
I must say almost all of the watches posted in this thread are really ugly imo.

I don't care much for watches, maybe that's the reason why I don't find them appealing?

My watch:

[image loading]
@riotsnowbird
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
August 18 2010 16:29 GMT
#35
I don't know how old you are but that is a difficult watch to pull off in a lot of settings.

Also its quartz so really apples and oranges with the other watches in this thread.

Glaven
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada554 Posts
August 18 2010 22:44 GMT
#36
Just curious what you think of TAG Heuer watches? I've always found them aesthetically pleasing and was considering saving up and getting one.
Special Tactics
lixlix
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States482 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-18 23:16:30
August 18 2010 23:12 GMT
#37
Tag belongs to the big 4 of mid tier luxury watches in my mind (Tag Heuer, Rolex, Omega, Breitling).

There are some Tag Heuers that I like very much such as the Carrera.



The thing with Tag is that they also produce a lot of in my opinion, over priced quartz watches, trying to profit off the brandname.

Thus this dilutes the brand name a bit. you kind of lose a bit of the aura of exclusivity.

Its like if you had a Porsche Carrera GT but everybody is running around with Boxsters.

Basically what I'm saying is that not all Tags are the same.

catleaves
Profile Joined December 2010
United States506 Posts
May 01 2012 16:55 GMT
#38
Hi! I searched for "chronograph" and it led me here.

Can anyone help ID this watch? It is pretty.

[image loading]

The watch was shown on an April 2012 Japanese drama titled Kagi no Kakatta Heya.

Thank you! ^_^

^^
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Platinum Heroes Events
13:00
PSC2L Finals - Playoffs
Shameless vs GeraldLIVE!
RotterdaM964
Liquipedia
OSC
13:00
World Championship: Challenger
WardiTV829
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 964
Lowko568
BRAT_OK 57
MindelVK 29
RushiSC 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 2212
Jaedong 1652
EffOrt 831
Stork 649
Larva 603
Shuttle 555
Soma 498
Mini 497
ggaemo 373
Light 324
[ Show more ]
actioN 316
Hyun 260
ZerO 217
Hyuk 216
Sharp 214
Snow 207
Rush 204
firebathero 192
Barracks 143
hero 57
Sea.KH 54
JYJ 53
Killer 35
Terrorterran 30
Mong 27
PianO 24
Rock 20
yabsab 18
soO 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
Sacsri 10
HiyA 8
Shine 7
Dota 2
qojqva4689
singsing2396
Fuzer 273
League of Legends
C9.Mang0522
Counter-Strike
zeus749
Other Games
Grubby4112
Gorgc2278
hiko572
B2W.Neo479
FrodaN343
Hui .309
Mlord301
crisheroes286
Liquid`VortiX107
ArmadaUGS77
KnowMe68
QueenE68
ZerO(Twitch)28
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 27
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• naamasc20
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV706
• lizZardDota283
League of Legends
• Jankos2675
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
10h 54m
OSC
19h 54m
IPSL
21h 54m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
1d 1h
OSC
1d 19h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
Patches Events
3 days
OSC
3 days
OSC
4 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

C-Race Season 1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S1: W2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Escore Tournament S1: W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
Underdog Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Disclosure: This page contains affiliate marketing links that support TLnet.

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.