On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
ever heard of progressive metal/rock?
I dare you to listen to Dream Theater's "Octavarium", Redemption's "Black and White World", or Devin Townsend's "The Death of Music" and make this argument again. Your view on music is clearly uninformed.
usually i have to be double dog dared but i did it anyways due to seeing how long the song actually is. ok. heres the deal. that shit is generic. synths are really cool if you are just starting to get into sound design. however for people like me who know how even a bit about it know that its lame. its just a fact. sure go ahead and say its expressing your soul or w/e the hell you want to believe. like i said previously. take the best parts from that song and rework it into 3-5 minutes and then it will be much better. problem solved. ///
On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
ever heard of progressive metal/rock?
I dare you to listen to Dream Theater's "Octavarium", Redemption's "Black and White World", or Devin Townsend's "The Death of Music" and make this argument again. Your view on music is clearly uninformed.
usually i have to be double dog dared but i did it anyways due to seeing how long the song actually is. ok. heres the deal. that shit is generic. synths are really cool if you are just starting to get into sound design. however for people like me who know how even a bit about it know that its lame. its just a fact. sure go ahead and say its expressing your soul or w/e the hell you want to believe. like i said previously. take the best parts from that song and rework it into 3-5 minutes and then it will be much better. problem solved. ///
Movie/2 hours Books/200 pages Drama/20 episodes
Replace.
Pretty retarded lol.
Sometimes people really have a lot to tell. You could shorten 3 minute songs into 2 minutes if theres fillers. There are 5+ minute songs without fillers.
On August 08 2010 15:24 mmp wrote: Metallica is an acquired taste... if you can't appreciate it, gtfo
And folks who think an 8 minute song is too long need to pop some Ritalin and s l o w d o w n. Get this kid some Justin Timberlake and CRY ME A FUCKIN RIVER.
Fade to Black may be one of best metal songs ever...
Really? I think AC/DC are probably one of the worst bands of all time.
Thou art banished from this thread, blasphemer!
And to all people who think 6+ minute songs suck... WTF are you talking about? Have you ever heard about this band called PINK FUCKING FLOYD? No? Let me refresh your memory then:
Shit does not get any more epic than this...
And of course, if you think this is old and stuff like that, then let me present to you something more recent:
On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
ever heard of progressive metal/rock?
I dare you to listen to Dream Theater's "Octavarium", Redemption's "Black and White World", or Devin Townsend's "The Death of Music" and make this argument again. Your view on music is clearly uninformed.
usually i have to be double dog dared but i did it anyways due to seeing how long the song actually is. ok. heres the deal. that shit is generic. synths are really cool if you are just starting to get into sound design. however for people like me who know how even a bit about it know that its lame. its just a fact. sure go ahead and say its expressing your soul or w/e the hell you want to believe. like i said previously. take the best parts from that song and rework it into 3-5 minutes and then it will be much better. problem solved. ///
How about classical? Should Chopin have shortened his nocturnes?
On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
ever heard of progressive metal/rock?
I dare you to listen to Dream Theater's "Octavarium", Redemption's "Black and White World", or Devin Townsend's "The Death of Music" and make this argument again. Your view on music is clearly uninformed.
usually i have to be double dog dared but i did it anyways due to seeing how long the song actually is. ok. heres the deal. that shit is generic. synths are really cool if you are just starting to get into sound design. however for people like me who know how even a bit about it know that its lame. its just a fact. sure go ahead and say its expressing your soul or w/e the hell you want to believe. like i said previously. take the best parts from that song and rework it into 3-5 minutes and then it will be much better. problem solved. ///
How about classical? Should Chopin have shortened his nocturnes?
Probably. Every classical piece I've ever heard was chock full of filler. There's like a minute that everyone knows from each classical piece because that minute is much better than the rest of the piece.
On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
ever heard of progressive metal/rock?
I dare you to listen to Dream Theater's "Octavarium", Redemption's "Black and White World", or Devin Townsend's "The Death of Music" and make this argument again. Your view on music is clearly uninformed.
usually i have to be double dog dared but i did it anyways due to seeing how long the song actually is. ok. heres the deal. that shit is generic. synths are really cool if you are just starting to get into sound design. however for people like me who know how even a bit about it know that its lame. its just a fact. sure go ahead and say its expressing your soul or w/e the hell you want to believe. like i said previously. take the best parts from that song and rework it into 3-5 minutes and then it will be much better. problem solved. ///
How about classical? Should Chopin have shortened his nocturnes?
Probably. Every classical piece I've ever heard was chock full of filler. There's like a minute that everyone knows from each classical piece because that minute is much better than the rest of the piece.
hahahaha oh my, I don't even want to know what shitty music you like to listen to, its probably all garbage.
On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
ever heard of progressive metal/rock?
I dare you to listen to Dream Theater's "Octavarium", Redemption's "Black and White World", or Devin Townsend's "The Death of Music" and make this argument again. Your view on music is clearly uninformed.
usually i have to be double dog dared but i did it anyways due to seeing how long the song actually is. ok. heres the deal. that shit is generic. synths are really cool if you are just starting to get into sound design. however for people like me who know how even a bit about it know that its lame. its just a fact. sure go ahead and say its expressing your soul or w/e the hell you want to believe. like i said previously. take the best parts from that song and rework it into 3-5 minutes and then it will be much better. problem solved. ///
How about classical? Should Chopin have shortened his nocturnes?
Probably. Every classical piece I've ever heard was chock full of filler. There's like a minute that everyone knows from each classical piece because that minute is much better than the rest of the piece.
The OP is so full of shit. Ride the lightning is good yes, don't know if it's there best. I always liked AJFA more, but saying they havent made anything good after load is just bullshit. Death magnetic is actually a pretty good album, and I think basically all the tracks are good. However it still doesnt compare to the there first 4 studio albums, but it's still pretty good, unlike that shitty st. anger album (barf).
I didn´t want to know and after reading I still don´t care, I guess I can´t have my 2minutes back I feel cheated.
E. well okay okay
1. The first album was promising ( probably only because of Mustaine ) 2. The next ones had some good moments IMO, then swedes killed Burton and musically Metallica was over 3. MONEY GOOD NAPSTER BAAAADDD! 4. ??? 5. Profit
Sumthin like that?
I also never understood the dissing of St. Anger although I haven´t heard it that many times. I mean it had something fresh for the first time since 82.... Maybe it´s just because of the sounds that have sucked on Metallica records since 86, and the fact Lars still can´t play :/
On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
ever heard of progressive metal/rock?
I dare you to listen to Dream Theater's "Octavarium", Redemption's "Black and White World", or Devin Townsend's "The Death of Music" and make this argument again. Your view on music is clearly uninformed.
usually i have to be double dog dared but i did it anyways due to seeing how long the song actually is. ok. heres the deal. that shit is generic. synths are really cool if you are just starting to get into sound design. however for people like me who know how even a bit about it know that its lame. its just a fact. sure go ahead and say its expressing your soul or w/e the hell you want to believe. like i said previously. take the best parts from that song and rework it into 3-5 minutes and then it will be much better. problem solved. ///
How about classical? Should Chopin have shortened his nocturnes?
Probably. Every classical piece I've ever heard was chock full of filler. There's like a minute that everyone knows from each classical piece because that minute is much better than the rest of the piece.
Here ya go, something short for you
No content for one second = shit. If I told you your short story dragged on and contained lots of redundant description, that is not a reason to replace the entire story with the word, "dick". A song or a story should be as long as it needs, and no longer.
On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
Well, never listen to Between the Buried and Me then. You'll just be angry.
I knew as soon as I read the OP that this was just going to be people mindlessly pressing their opinions on one another about music. Which is usually the case with re-hashed topics like this. Regardless, I really like S&M and I also really enjoy Death Magnetic.
On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
Well, never listen to Between the Buried and Me then. You'll just be angry.
On August 08 2010 12:11 OneFierceZealot wrote: i heard this one song this one time and it was ok. i changed stations and listened to two songs in a row. i came back to first station and the one song was still playing. it was by metallica. im assuming half of their songs could be a good minute to two minutes shorter. there is no reason for a band to have 6+ minute long songs.
Well, never listen to Between the Buried and Me then. You'll just be angry.
EPT
