• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:26
CEST 15:26
KST 22:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles1[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China7Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL64Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 728 users

To the Moon

Blogs > dimfish
Post a Reply
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-07 16:13:15
May 07 2010 16:11 GMT
#1
Does the thought of new tilesets cause your toes to tingle? Me too.

Here's a map that I really like the progress of in terms of being a viable tourney map:

(2)Zenith Madrid
[image loading]

download (2)ZenithMadrid.SC2Map

The core concept for this map is that there is a short rush distance between the mains, but easily defended. Once a defender has established a good defense for the short path, the dynamic of the map changes and players will probably make a more solid push around the longer path, or maybe even try to use both at the same time, like send a raid in the short while army marches the longer, wider alternate route.

You might recall that Paranoid Android is built around a similar concept. The short bridge creates a quicker path between mains, but would be ineffective for getting a larger army across the map. As the players develop an army the map's features cause shifts in strategy and/or tactics. Cool, right?

So let's do something like this, but designed for SC2.

[image loading]

One path to the main is short and very narrow, but units the enemy main can punish your attack if they are prepared for it. Then there is another, wider path around the far side of the main. Both paths intersect at the natural on the furthest side of the main.

Zenith Madrid is then similar to the infamous Desert Oasis or SC1 maps like Raid Assault where the mains aren't hanging off the edge of the playable area, they are moved inward so that units can walk a path all the way around.

Now, before you break a pool cue in half and scream "I hate the naturals on Desert O!" just hear me out. I don't like those naturals, either, and for that matter I don't like that siege tanks, colossus or whatever can get within like 3 grids of your main mineral line on the outside path. So I made sure to address these issues:

1. The two paths around to the main on desert oasis are more or less the same. It's like a "Chicken or beef for dinner?" question and your answer is "Whichever, they're both fine." And they are wide, mostly, so it is easy to waltz into the natural.

The core concept for Zenith Madrid, though, is to make the paths around the main very different. At some point in the early game you can wreck an attack coming at you by the short route, so you can effectively create one path into the natural. The natural itself is also more intimate with the main choke than Desert OMGasis.

2. Because of SC2's high ground mechanic we don't want players to, say, surround the other guy's main with seige tanks, get vision, and suddenly blow every tech building to bits. Quite a bit of the main's cliffs on Zenith Madrid could be sieged, but about half of that is along the short path, so if I'm ready for your tanks, they can't get away when you move it for that. You can still go the far, more open side and seige, but I made sure the mineral lines aren't right there.

There is still plenty of opportunity for harass on this map, but I feel in a more fair, manageable sense than DO.


[image loading]

Some other interesting notes for this map:

-The center isn't exactly a choke, but you could rally units there and try to use it as a pivot for keeping map control.

-There are several gold expos, a close one that's open to attack and an easier defended one that you gotta bust debris to get or distance mine it. I don't think there is too much gold, and by encouraging players to use gold expos which are on the extreme left and right, we are actually drawing attention away from the shortest main-to-main route that is very important in the early game. So maybe when both players are working the gold angle mid-to-late that rush path becomes relevant again?

Please hit me up with some constructive feedback, or just to toss around some general map design ideas. I am especially interested in critical comments like "Thing X on your map is not suitable for tournament play because Y." That is literally the most helpful thing someone could offer, because if you ask me right now I'd say Zenith Madrid could serve as a tourney map, after getting some love in the beauty department, of course.

Poll: (2) Zenith Madrid? Yeah, I'd love to...

see it sucked into a black hole so I never have to look at it again. Barf. (12)
 
92%

have this in ladder rotation so I can drop the hammer on inevitable 9 pools, constantly. (1)
 
8%

see Effort and ZerO make their professional ZvZ debut on this map, ZM is tournament-quality. (0)
 
0%

perfect my rush strategies on this map in practice games. (0)
 
0%

13 total votes

Your vote: (2) Zenith Madrid? Yeah, I'd love to...

(Vote): see Effort and ZerO make their professional ZvZ debut on this map, ZM is tournament-quality.
(Vote): perfect my rush strategies on this map in practice games.
(Vote): have this in ladder rotation so I can drop the hammer on inevitable 9 pools, constantly.
(Vote): see it sucked into a black hole so I never have to look at it again. Barf.




Kralic
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada2628 Posts
May 07 2010 16:37 GMT
#2
Very neat idea. I like it a lot. Only thing I can see right away is that the middle is narrower on the top portion than the bottom portion.
Brood War forever!
ZpuX
Profile Blog Joined December 2002
Sweden1230 Posts
May 07 2010 16:41 GMT
#3
just read over your comments real fast, but by just looking a the map I can tell you it's never going to be a popular map within the good players. The distance is far to long between the mains. The expos is far to hard to protect and the middle is way too narrow. The good maps might be very boring at times, but think about why LT etc is so successful? It is because it got everything your map lack which is essential for a popular map.
Really, play for fun!
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
May 07 2010 16:48 GMT
#4
On May 08 2010 01:37 Kralic wrote:
Very neat idea. I like it a lot. Only thing I can see right away is that the middle is narrower on the top portion than the bottom portion.


Ooh, good catch, I'll fix that after work, thanks!
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
May 07 2010 16:49 GMT
#5
Imagine blinkstalkers, collosi and air on this map...
canucks12
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada812 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-07 17:14:58
May 07 2010 16:52 GMT
#6
The rush distance is really short. I don't understand why there is a small path that basically goes directly from one ramp to the other. I also don't like how if you build defenses at the natural, the enemy can use said path to run straight to the main. It has the same feel as desert oasis. One more note, I think that it would be better to make the high yield that is near the mains into just normal expansions or at least put some destructible rocks there.


edit* I do like how the natural is on higher ground than the middle, I didn't see that before.
KinosJourney2
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Sweden1811 Posts
May 07 2010 16:54 GMT
#7
Concept is nice, but work on the looks of the map. Looks are half as important as the actual map. Right now its a bit stale (second high-yield for the players comes to mind).
ocho wrote: EDIT: NEVERMIND, THIS THING HAS APM TECHNOLOGY OMG
Zelniq
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States7166 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-07 17:00:29
May 07 2010 16:59 GMT
#8
nearly the whole map is narrow chokes and paths man this is worse than Kulas Ravine

need a lot more wide areas not just 1 on each side
ModeratorBlame yourself or God
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
May 07 2010 17:05 GMT
#9
On May 08 2010 01:41 ZpuX wrote:
just read over your comments real fast, but by just looking a the map I can tell you it's never going to be a popular map within the good players.


Ok, great, let's get some tough critique.

The distance is far to long between the mains.


Really? I think that short path is actually pretty short comparatively and the longer route from main-to-main isn't bad either. I'll tell you what, I can't do it now but later today I'll run some experiments and post travel times compared to all of the possible LT spawns.

The expos is far to hard to protect

Which ones? All of them? The natural is much easier to protect than Desert Oasis and I'd argue only slightly harder than Metalopolis. It also cannot be cliffed like nats on LT.

Do you mean those normal-yield expos nearest to the center? Yeah, they are hanging out in the wind there. What do you think about punching a thin hole in the terrain there to provide a defensive wall?

and the middle is way too narrow.

Ok, suppose I fix the mistakenly tighter middle area just under the top spawn that is narrower than I meant (thanks to Kralic for pointing that out!). I could also remove the center doodad, but other than that the shortest route is supposed to wicked narrow. So there is this longer, but plenty wide path that "snakes" around the map with some narrow sections and some very wide sections. I think you could move out with a 150 food army comfortably. And nothing is stopping you from sending your big army through the tight side next to your own main--it's the tight side next to the enemy main that's tough to march a force through, right?


The good maps might be very boring at times, but think about why LT etc is so successful? It is because it got everything your map lack which is essential for a popular map.


I hear you that as a map designer we have to throttle back on all the crazy stuff we want to try if the goal is a lasting map. But TL's got everything my map lacks? If you can humor me and check back tomorrow maybe I can convince you it's not as bad as all this.

Oh yeah, and honestly, thanks! That was a detailed critique, and I appreciate it.
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
May 07 2010 17:13 GMT
#10
On May 08 2010 01:49 Ghostcom wrote:
Imagine blinkstalkers, collosi and air on this map...


I did, man, I DID!

1. Blinkstalkers can use that little pad to get to the island expo, which can be used to put a siege tank down or maybe other clever moves. So what? You paid for blink, attack! He paid for blink, defend! Other than that, where on this map are blinkstalkers kickin' ass where they can't on other maps for the beta tourneys?

2. Collosi, reapers, wall-jumping in general are considered.

Look carefully at this close-up image again:
[image loading]

The main is 2 levels higher than the center. You have to advance halfway around to the backside of the main before there is one-level difference. The point here is that I should be able to, with vigilance, see your cliff-jumper before it is in my main and react accordingly. If you take the time to walk way around the far side, which is meant to be a wider path, yeah you can finally sneak up on a cliff that you can jump up just as I spot you, but that should be an option if you're willing to flank.

3. Air, these bases are further apart than the closest pair on LT, for example. What's the problem? They're probably equal to the distance on Scrap Station, but I can measure it for you.
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
May 07 2010 17:20 GMT
#11
On May 08 2010 01:52 canucks12 wrote:
The rush distance is really short. I don't understand why there is a small path that basically goes directly from one ramp to the other.


I'm not trying to be rude here, amigo, but did you read my OP? That is basically the core concept of this map. The rush distance is short but not ludicrous short.


I also don't like how if you build defenses at the natural, the enemy can use said path to run straight to the main. It has the same feel as desert oasis.


I disagree, and again this is literally in my OP. The natural is pulled in towards the main compared to DO. Now, imagine where you place defenses for nat on Metalopolis, right? You probably place it near your main ramp but partially helping the natural. On Zenith Madrid you also can place, say bunkers or spine crawlers just at the bottom of the main ramp to defend that short path, but also aid you in a battle at the natural. But, also like Metalopolis, if you are only willing to fight right next to your bunker then the enemy can always move to the far side of the natural (on this map that's a long walk) to harass.


One more note, I think that it would be better to make the high yield that is near the mains into just normal expansions or at least put some destructible rocks there.


Why? It's quite open on purpose, and as you pointed out there is this dynamic at the natural and main we're thinking about. If you can get an expo going there and your opponent doesn't scout it (because maybe they focus everything on that short side) then you deserve it!
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
May 07 2010 17:21 GMT
#12
On May 08 2010 01:54 KinosJourney2 wrote:
Concept is nice, but work on the looks of the map. Looks are half as important as the actual map. Right now its a bit stale (second high-yield for the players comes to mind).


True, it needs beautification. I'll put in the work if I get a consensus people want to play this map!
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
May 07 2010 17:29 GMT
#13
On May 08 2010 01:59 Zelniq wrote:
nearly the whole map is narrow chokes and paths man this is worse than Kulas Ravine

need a lot more wide areas not just 1 on each side


Wow, worse than Kulas?! Please let me present an argument against! On Kulas if I order my army from one main to another I literally walk by four or five cliffs. On this map, if you examine the long route to the main, there are NO cliffs except the ramp you walk up, which I can follow a unit up easily. Check it:

[image loading]

There is that unpathable terrain between the center and the main so your enemy doesn't see you taking the wide, safe walk. And you don't even have to do this whole walk to attack--take the narrow shortcut on your own side and use the enemy's wide side to work in safely.
bITt.mAN
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Switzerland3693 Posts
May 07 2010 17:33 GMT
#14
I like how you made the islands cliffable, but the main difficulty I can envision on this map is splitting it in two. Imagine if its a TvT and each player lines their tanks on either side of the really narrow center, then precede to take all their respective bases and macro up.

The thing about most great maps with dynamic play is that there are expos to fight over, they are disputed and not "ok this base is on my half of the map so I'll take it and cap near the middle to defend it".

You mention Paranoid Android [LOVE that map] and I think its great to base any sort of map design off that one, just that in the bottom left corner of PA there is an expo that belongs to no one, it is disputed. What tends to happen [as far as I can remember its been a while] is whoever secures that expo can out-macro their opponent and win.

Therefore I suggest you remove the potentially stale dynamic of splitting the map by doing two things:

1: Making the central choke (its so small I'll call it that) bigger by moving the mains away from each other (ofc keep it symmetrical). This would facilitate more aggressive (e.g. venturing to the opponent's half) play because it would make it less of a major commitment to step beyond no-man's-land. Also test if sensor towers can reach from main to main, if they can I don't think thats too cool.

2: [The big one] Re-work the island dynamic. I really like the islands, it's cute how you can blink stalkers to them (well at least I think you can), but they appear to be extensions of the splitting-the-map dynamic (well I've never played/tested the map so I don't actually know). I suggest that you make that tiny blip of a lee-way island into a decently wide bridge.

Also, make it more viable to drop the island by either making it slightly closer to the other main or by even adding one of those blip islands.

My rationale behind this proposed change is that if it is easier to take an alternate route to your opponent's expos/natural/main it will be more exciting, harder and more stimulating to play, as a counter-attack is more viable. You have a big wide expanse between the 3 land expos (North-East of bottom's main) and this would actually be more used if one could drop one's army on the island and walk down.

If I had a Beta Key, I would have Galaxy Editor and I would actually DO the changes I've suggested, but as it is hope it helps. In any case I like it, keep it up!
BW4LYF . . . . . . PM me, I LOVE PMs. . . . . . Long live "NaDa's Body" . . . . . . Fantasy | Bisu/Best | Jaedong . . . . .
zZygote
Profile Blog Joined January 2007
Canada898 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-07 17:42:51
May 07 2010 17:41 GMT
#15
The small pathway to the left and right respectively of the main is way way way wayyyy too narrow. (Unless this was intentional)

Other than that, the concept is well planed-out.

P.S. The little pads on the island expo's can be really abused by terran players to just lift off and just freely farm in the island expo.

Also I was wondering if you can get a collosi to walk onto the little pads?


I hope your map get's recognized somewhere
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
May 07 2010 19:20 GMT
#16
First off, thanks bITt.mAN for great response full of comments!

On May 08 2010 02:33 bITt.mAN wrote:
the main difficulty I can envision on this map is splitting it in two. Imagine if its a TvT and each player lines their tanks on either side of the really narrow center, then precede to take all their respective bases and macro up.

The thing about most great maps with dynamic play is that there are expos to fight over, they are disputed and not "ok this base is on my half of the map so I'll take it and cap near the middle to defend it".


I see what you mean, but if we both sieged up and I flew a few banshees around to harass your expansions and threatening your tanks, do you think I could have a chance of breaking your half of the center control? What I mean is that by sieging the center you could control ground movement to your half of the map, that is true, but is it so easy to sit back on that and macro from whichever bases you please?

That said, I'm hearing you and others and I will see what I can do to really open up the center significantly, and still keep the map true to my original concept.



You mention Paranoid Android [LOVE that map] and I think its great to base any sort of map design off that one, just that in the bottom left corner of PA there is an expo that belongs to no one, it is disputed. What tends to happen [as far as I can remember its been a while] is whoever secures that expo can out-macro their opponent and win.

Therefore I suggest you remove the potentially stale dynamic of splitting the map by doing two things:

1: Making the central choke (its so small I'll call it that) bigger by moving the mains away from each other (ofc keep it symmetrical). This would facilitate more aggressive (e.g. venturing to the opponent's half) play because it would make it less of a major commitment to step beyond no-man's-land. Also test if sensor towers can reach from main to main, if they can I don't think thats too cool.


Roger that, will experiment with opening the center and will test with sensor towers.


2: [The big one] Re-work the island dynamic. I really like the islands, it's cute how you can blink stalkers to them (well at least I think you can), but they appear to be extensions of the splitting-the-map dynamic (well I've never played/tested the map so I don't actually know).


If I open the center and the "pads" aren't in anyone's half, do you think the islands then become just fine?

I suggest that you make that tiny blip of a lee-way island into a decently wide bridge.


I interpret that two different ways. 1) Actually turn the pad into a bridge which makes the island into a penninsula or probably you mean 2) widen the pad so it is still a tiny island of its own between the expansions, but wider for more units.

If you mean 2) then I'll respond that I meant for it to be very small. If you want to siege the island expo there is a cliff for that, and the pad is sort of a non-essential opportunity for clever players to use. I'd rather it not be very lage and, for instance, allow you to "cliff" two expos with one group of 8 tanks.


Also, make it more viable to drop the island by either making it slightly closer to the other main or by even adding one of those blip islands.

My rationale behind this proposed change is that if it is easier to take an alternate route to your opponent's expos/natural/main it will be more exciting, harder and more stimulating to play, as a counter-attack is more viable. You have a big wide expanse between the 3 land expos (North-East of bottom's main) and this would actually be more used if one could drop one's army on the island and walk down.


Did you make a mistake there and mean if I did a big drop to the corner-most gold expo (rather than the island) then I could move my army out towards the enemy main from a direction he is not expecting? In which case, the fly distance is a little far, but would making it a little closer really change the viability of that strategy? I'm a little confused here, but I'll agree that somehow out of all this we want counter-attacks to be more viable! BAM!


If I had a Beta Key, I would have Galaxy Editor and I would actually DO the changes I've suggested, but as it is hope it helps. In any case I like it, keep it up!


Since you are the first to ask, good sir, when I get my first friend invite its yours. I've been in beta a few weeks now and no invite yet, though. ?
dimfish
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States663 Posts
May 07 2010 19:26 GMT
#17
On May 08 2010 02:41 zZygote wrote:
The small pathway to the left and right respectively of the main is way way way wayyyy too narrow. (Unless this was intentional)


Yes, intentional. I want you to be able to attempt a rush early, but unlike Desert Oasis for instance, I want you to be able to completely shut down that short pathway if you devote some effort to it. Then the map flow changes as big armies move out to the sides of the map to get a wider attack vector on the main. But then, after you think you shut down the short path, maybe I can try to sneak a DT or try a baneling bust late-game after you are no longer vigilant. Or something. :oP



Other than that, the concept is well planed-out.

Thanks!


P.S. The little pads on the island expo's can be really abused by terran players to just lift off and just freely farm in the island expo.

How is this different from Terrans using an island expo on any map?


Also I was wondering if you can get a collosi to walk onto the little pads?


No, they are not connected by a cliff, so the mighty colossus cannot walk to it.


I hope your map get's recognized somewhere

When the publish patch hits you could help it get recognized by asking someone to play with you on it! ;o)
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
#43
WardiTV1260
OGKoka 539
Harstem422
IndyStarCraft 167
Rex158
CranKy Ducklings98
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 539
Harstem 418
Rex 175
IndyStarCraft 167
Hui .167
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 2542
Flash 2177
Bisu 2145
Hyuk 1227
EffOrt 786
ZerO 728
firebathero 627
Larva 519
Snow 393
actioN 390
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 377
Stork 363
Soma 306
GuemChi 144
Pusan 122
Mind 100
JulyZerg 87
PianO 85
Light 82
hero 77
TY 56
sSak 54
Sharp 52
Sea.KH 48
sorry 36
Barracks 36
Aegong 34
Free 26
Terrorterran 25
GoRush 25
soO 24
Movie 22
zelot 22
JYJ21
HiyA 21
yabsab 20
IntoTheRainbow 12
Shine 7
ivOry 3
Dota 2
qojqva3035
Gorgc1844
XaKoH 616
syndereN341
XcaliburYe326
League of Legends
singsing2458
Counter-Strike
byalli245
markeloff90
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King201
Other Games
B2W.Neo1122
hiko939
crisheroes458
Lowko286
Beastyqt227
ArmadaUGS145
Liquid`VortiX66
rGuardiaN42
ZerO(Twitch)20
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick36764
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 790
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2933
• WagamamaTV313
League of Legends
• Nemesis5869
Upcoming Events
RotterdaM Event
2h 34m
Replay Cast
10h 34m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
20h 34m
WardiTV European League
1d 2h
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 10h
The PondCast
1d 20h
WardiTV European League
1d 22h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.