EPTOn April 26 2010 05:15 538 wrote:
Now I see this might be an attempted subtle critique of the phenomenon present on (but not exclusive to) TL that users with higher post counts seem to de facto have the upper hand in any debate and gain sometimes ill-founded respect and reputation automatically just by having been around for longer or having spammed more posts, but I'd say this is not the way to present an argument.
Now I see this might be an attempted subtle critique of the phenomenon present on (but not exclusive to) TL that users with higher post counts seem to de facto have the upper hand in any debate and gain sometimes ill-founded respect and reputation automatically just by having been around for longer or having spammed more posts, but I'd say this is not the way to present an argument.
It might just be someone who wants to discuss if he knows nothing
