• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:01
CEST 09:01
KST 16:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27
Community News
Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.7Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)13BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey. I have an extra ticket to the GSL Ro4/finals Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson." Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 35126 users

I dont understand whats going on with goldman Sach

Blogs > HyoSang
Post a Reply
HyoSang
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States194 Posts
April 20 2010 02:56 GMT
#1
I understand that Goldman Sachs is under investigation for fraud due to its abachus program. But I have no idea how exactly this abacus package allowed people to bet against the housing market. Can someone explain in simple terms how this happend?

*
EE HAN TIMING!!
Chunkybuddha
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Canada347 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-20 03:32:38
April 20 2010 03:13 GMT
#2
Well they designed a package that knew would fail.

Organizations like ACA (market insurance), IKB (German bank), ABN (dutch bank), and Goldman all were betting against the packages and deals they all created. Hence how the market fell through, yet these businesses made MASSIVE profits...

Oh btw, I doubt Goldman will fall. You have to remember it wasn't just Goldman doing this, lol. The situation became too complicated so its very difficult to point blame. If you point blame at Goldman, Goldman points blame at ACA, etc etc. These companies have geniuses working for them creating not only great money making deals, but ways to cover up their deals.

ENRON was way worse than this shit.
USER WAS SEXUALLY ABUSED FOR THIS POST.
Glider
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States1353 Posts
April 20 2010 03:23 GMT
#3
Greed and selfishness is what happened
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-20 03:35:10
April 20 2010 03:27 GMT
#4
Every trade has a counter-party. You can't bet on the housing market without someone on the other side betting against it.

In this case, one party seems to have pretty much known all along that the trade was going to go in their direction. Paulson and Co. concocted these "CDO"s that apparently were extremely toxic. Goldman Sach marketed these CDOs to various investors. Once the housing market crashed, Paulson and Co. made $1 billion. The counter-parties lost $1 billion.

The crux of the SEC charge is that GS had a conflict of interest -- they had a client who was creating super risky contracts, but did not reveal this to the investors. Because of their fiduciary duty to the investors, they should have fully revealed, to the extent as written by law, who created them, etc. I remember reading that GS's description of the CDOs did not mention Paulson and Co. even once and in fact were offering CDOs created by "trustworthy" institutions.

One can argue that buyers of the CDOs should have known all along that they were risky investments. No one was forcing them to buy. On the other hand, one could argue that the seller misrepresented the products and tricked people. Whether it's "buyer beware" or "gtfo frauds" is what will result from the trial.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
ShOoTiNg_SpElLs
Profile Joined July 2003
Korea (South)690 Posts
April 20 2010 03:32 GMT
#5
A hedge fund (Paulson & Co.) thought that the housing market was going to crash, and was looking for ways to make money off of it. So they approached GS with the idea that GS would create a portfolio of mortgage-based products (the Abacus), and sell it to different investors who believed that the housing market would continue to rise, while Paulson & Co. would take a short position.

The catch however, is that the SEC claims that Paulson & Co. hand-picked the mortgages in the portfolio, and third parties were not aware of the fact that a major hedge fund who picked the mortgages for the portfolio was taking a short position. So when the housing market eventually crashed, Paulson & Co. took home over a billion dollars, whereas the other investors lost the billion dollars.
ramen-
Profile Joined September 2009
90 Posts
April 20 2010 03:33 GMT
#6
If I understand correctly they bought insurance on the toxic assets. This effectively means that the insurance company was "betting" the assets wouldn't turn out to under, and Goldman was "betting" that they would go under. If the assets were bad, Goldman would receive the insurance money and the insurance company would lose. If the assets were good, the insurance company doesn't have to pay anything, and Goldman lost the amount they paid for the insurance.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-20 03:37:44
April 20 2010 03:37 GMT
#7
On April 20 2010 12:33 ramen- wrote:
If I understand correctly they bought insurance on the toxic assets. This effectively means that the insurance company was "betting" the assets wouldn't turn out to under, and Goldman was "betting" that they would go under. If the assets were bad, Goldman would receive the insurance money and the insurance company would lose. If the assets were good, the insurance company doesn't have to pay anything, and Goldman lost the amount they paid for the insurance.


There's more layers than that, because everything you stated is legal.

The illegal part (potentially, if proven) is that GS had a conflict of interest. The SEC is charging them of favoring one client over the other.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
ramen-
Profile Joined September 2009
90 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-20 03:45:36
April 20 2010 03:45 GMT
#8
On April 20 2010 12:37 StRyKeR wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

On April 20 2010 12:33 ramen- wrote:
If I understand correctly they bought insurance on the toxic assets. This effectively means that the insurance company was "betting" the assets wouldn't turn out to under, and Goldman was "betting" that they would go under. If the assets were bad, Goldman would receive the insurance money and the insurance company would lose. If the assets were good, the insurance company doesn't have to pay anything, and Goldman lost the amount they paid for the insurance.


There's more layers than that, because everything you stated is legal.

The illegal part (potentially, if proven) is that GS had a conflict of interest. The SEC is charging them of favoring one client over the other.


Yeah that's true, I just thought in his post he was primarily asking how it was possible to bet against the housing market.
ShOoTiNg_SpElLs
Profile Joined July 2003
Korea (South)690 Posts
April 20 2010 03:45 GMT
#9
On April 20 2010 12:13 Chunkybuddha wrote:
Well they designed a package that knew would fail.

Organizations like ACA (market insurance), IKB (German bank), ABN (dutch bank), and Goldman all were betting against the packages and deals they all created. Hence how the market fell through, yet these businesses made MASSIVE profits...

Oh btw, I doubt Goldman will fall. You have to remember it wasn't just Goldman doing this, lol. The situation became too complicated so its very difficult to point blame. If you point blame at Goldman, Goldman points blame at ACA, etc etc. These companies have geniuses working for them creating not only great money making deals, but ways to cover up their deals.

ENRON was way worse than this shit.


ACA/IKB/ABN didn't make profits from this. In fact, IKB and RBS (who took over ABN) needed to be bailed out by the government as a result of losing nearly $1 billion from this investment.
Acies
Profile Joined September 2009
Australia196 Posts
April 20 2010 03:49 GMT
#10
My rather primitive understanding is they bundle a bunch of assets into a package, some that will have a good rate of return and some that will result in loss. The distribution of good and toxic assets in the package is meant to be random but they deliberately made them have high amounts of toxic assets so the package would still be valued high since it's assumed to be random but in reality is worthless.

Am I on the right track here?
AvalancheGaming.org - SC2 Tournament and LAN in Bunbury, Western Australia
ShOoTiNg_SpElLs
Profile Joined July 2003
Korea (South)690 Posts
April 20 2010 03:58 GMT
#11
On April 20 2010 12:49 Acies wrote:
My rather primitive understanding is they bundle a bunch of assets into a package, some that will have a good rate of return and some that will result in loss. The distribution of good and toxic assets in the package is meant to be random but they deliberately made them have high amounts of toxic assets so the package would still be valued high since it's assumed to be random but in reality is worthless.

Am I on the right track here?


Ideally, one only wants products that will perform in the future. For example, the Abacus product was rated Aaa by Moody's when Goldman was marketing it to its investors. ACA also believed that the assets in the Abacus product would all be worth a lot in the future, because it thought Paulson & Co. (who submitted the initial shortlist of the mortgages in the Abacus) was taking a long position.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
April 20 2010 03:59 GMT
#12
On April 20 2010 12:49 Acies wrote:
My rather primitive understanding is they bundle a bunch of assets into a package, some that will have a good rate of return and some that will result in loss. The distribution of good and toxic assets in the package is meant to be random but they deliberately made them have high amounts of toxic assets so the package would still be valued high since it's assumed to be random but in reality is worthless.

Am I on the right track here?


Well, sort of. That kind of package would be entirely legal, given full disclosure. The problem arises if any part of the representation was misleading.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
HyoSang
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States194 Posts
April 20 2010 18:47 GMT
#13
thanks guys, this really cleared things up
EE HAN TIMING!!
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 59m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 316
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 710
Nal_rA 331
Larva 194
Shinee 81
Bale 54
Noble 25
ivOry 5
NotJumperer 5
eros_byul 2
Dota 2
monkeys_forever618
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1613
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King97
Other Games
C9.Mang01280
WinterStarcraft548
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream5762
Other Games
gamesdonequick548
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 37
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota285
League of Legends
• Stunt443
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
59m
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2h 59m
WardiTV Qualifier
8h 59m
BSL: ProLeague
10h 59m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
16h 59m
Wardi Open
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
3 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
SC Evo League
6 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-11
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.