|
It is a lot easier to understand the other gender if:
Women assumes all men mainly wants them to for sex. Aka sexy is positive, after that it is just to have as few negative sides as possible.
Men assumes that all women mainly wants them since it would make her friends jealous. Aka the more status you got the more attractive you are. Having good looks/social competence and such gives a bit of status, having a good job or a lot of power in other ways gives a lot of status etc.
This then shaped society, where women tries to be good looking and other than that not be seen, while men tries to act as impressive as possible and works their asses of to land the top jobs. And women wonders why males earns more... It is their fucking fault for forcing them to be successful to reproduce!
When a man loses his status (aka his job) he also usually loses his woman shortly after. When a woman loses her job you don't find any correlation to them breaking up. This is reversed when people gets deathly sick by the way, men leaves their sick women and women sticks with their sick men. I guess that having a sick husband grants you a ton of attention from your friends while having a sick wife grants you no sex.
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
This article is about 90% true.
|
After being married for 44 years, I took a careful look at my wife one day and said “Honey, 44 years ago we had a cheap apartment, a cheap car, slept on a sofa bed and watched a 10-inch black and white TV, but I got to sleep every night with a hot 21 year old gal.”
“Now I have a $ 500,000 home, a $ 45,000 car, nice big bed and plasma screen TV but I’m sleeping with a 65 year old woman. It seems to me that you’re not holding up your side of things.”
My wife is a very reasonable woman. She told me to go out and find a hot 21 year old gal and she would make sure that I would once again be living in a cheap apartment, driving a cheap car, sleeping on a sofa bed and watching a 10 inch black and white TV.
|
Adam: God why did you make Eve so stupid?
God: To love you, Adam.
|
There's definitely a sliver of truth to this article.
|
On January 27 2010 03:29 Kennigit wrote:
This article is about 90% true.
100% true 90% of the time.
|
The article is awesome. End story.
Semi-related note: Mom constantly tells me/us she married my dad for his brains.
|
|
|
On January 27 2010 03:46 Tex wrote:
The article is awesome. End story.
Semi-related note: Mom constantly tells me/us she married my dad for his brains.
Brains -> successful job -> money
|
On January 27 2010 02:48 neobowman wrote:
I'm just going to wait for the TL women's look on this.
might be faster to compile a list and personally pm them
|
On January 27 2010 03:14 Koltz wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2010 02:36 Chef wrote:Of course it's radical; that's what makes it genius. Radical? I'm pretty sure misogyny has been around for over 1000 years. What's been radical is the changes from might = right in technologically developed cultures that has allowed women to fight for their right to vote, to work whatever job they want (if they're qualified of course, and at least in theory), and just generally not being thought of as immediately inferior for no good reason (by at least the male population that isn't sexually frustrated). haha maybe you mistook this as a work of misogyny. I want to say this work is almost... satirical. I don't think he hates women, but merely strives to provide some thoughts on the men-women bond. Of course you can't generalize, but i'm sure there exists some inherent part of womenkind which mimics exactly what he proposes.
It's saying women are bringing men down and that men are somehow superior to women. Some of the things it says could be true about women, but they are no less true about men. We equally need to be told what is attractive. We equally want to survive, and so we choose a partner who will fit in with society (or, if we think society is unhealthy, a partner who will not).
It's misguided at best. For all that people make fun of history, sociology, psychology, etc majors... Some of the thickest people on earth are people who never dabbled in any of those topics, including the author of this article.
|
its true. Most of the guys I know look like shit yet they still have pretty gfs. Real life examples are EVERYWHERE. Its always some old rich guy with some supermodel wife, and its rarely the opposite (old rich hag with supermodel husband? sorry, never heard).
|
United States43274 Posts
On January 27 2010 03:30 lMPERVlOUS wrote:Show nested quote +After being married for 44 years, I took a careful look at my wife one day and said “Honey, 44 years ago we had a cheap apartment, a cheap car, slept on a sofa bed and watched a 10-inch black and white TV, but I got to sleep every night with a hot 21 year old gal.”
“Now I have a $ 500,000 home, a $ 45,000 car, nice big bed and plasma screen TV but I’m sleeping with a 65 year old woman. It seems to me that you’re not holding up your side of things.”
My wife is a very reasonable woman. She told me to go out and find a hot 21 year old gal and she would make sure that I would once again be living in a cheap apartment, driving a cheap car, sleeping on a sofa bed and watching a 10 inch black and white TV.
Made me smile.
|
It seems like success with women is equal to spending half of your life working to create a giant illusion, something vastly tiring and annoying, while sacrificing your own true self and your own interests. We construct our lives around nest-building. We're like male birds building nests and showing them off to attract mates. It's pathetic. Everything we do is to get women. It is a fucking shit deal.
Someone needs to invent a drug which has no hormonal imbalance side-effects but is able to erase a man's sex drive and attraction to women. It would increase productivity rates to incredible heights. I'd be free and happy. I'd feel complete. I'd be able to concentrate on my biochemistry studying.
While i don't really agree with the whole article ( because i guess that it is often true for men too ), i think that the conclusion is spot on.
|
this thread is full of people arguing that women arent shallow....but they are superficial. I dont either is very nice.
|
The things that pop up when you search on google...
This is about as true as the OP.
|
On January 27 2010 03:29 Kennigit wrote:
This article is about 90% true.
Ah, Kennigit... imparter of wisdom.
|
Truth: sex is dumb. Guys are only sexually attracted to girls with attractive bodies. Period. Women are attracted by other more subtle factors. Article is 100% accurate with regards to sexual attraction.
In response to Chill's comment on the other page:
"Have you ever met or dated a girl that's gorgeous but you can't stand being with her because there's nothing special about her?"
The answer is no. When you're fucking a 9 or a 10 you really don't give a shit about anything else other than the fact that she's a 9 or a 10. Doesn't mean I would go into a long-term relationship with a girl whose beliefs are diametrically opposed to mine, its just that you can't tell me you wouldn't fuck a 10 if that was all there was to it.
|
Forward this to 10 friends or women will never like you.
On January 27 2010 04:06 SirKibbleX wrote:
The answer is no. When you're fucking a 9 or a 10 you really don't give a shit about anything else other than the fact that she's a 9 or a 10. Doesn't mean I would go into a long-term relationship with a girl whose beliefs are diametrically opposed to mine, its just that you can't tell me you wouldn't fuck a 10 if that was all there was to it.
You do give a shit, because your name isn't Troy McNamara
|
On January 27 2010 03:58 stack wrote:
this thread is full of people arguing that women arent shallow....but they are superficial. I dont either is very nice.
It doesn't really matter whether it's "nice" or not it's whether it's true.
I think the part on women is mostly true for the vast majority of women... but not all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://www.mikexia.com/etc/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/evil-women.jpg)
