EPTThat essay is about as true as my statement.
Women aren't attracted to men - Page 2
| Blogs > Koltz |
|
GGQ
Canada2653 Posts
That essay is about as true as my statement. | ||
|
Xenocide_Knight
Korea (South)2625 Posts
| ||
|
PiLLs( SLiP)
United States9 Posts
Then goes on for five minutes on how he only likes a women for the way she looks. "Men are ignorant shallow bastards" Humans in general suck. | ||
|
kruul_pz
United States10 Posts
 | ||
|
Impervious
Canada4222 Posts
On January 27 2010 02:56 PiLLs( SLiP) wrote: I think its hilarious he says" Women are materialistic prostitutes" Then goes on for five minutes on how he only likes a women for the way she looks. "Men are ignorant shallow bastards" Humans in general suck. Unfortunately, that's truer than most people would like to admit..... | ||
|
Chef
10810 Posts
I think in a lot of ways society is unhealthy, but I don't think humans suck in general, or that just one gender is to blame for society's negative aspects. | ||
|
DwmC_Foefen
Belgium2186 Posts
Sometimes I despise humankind in general... Sometimes I'm despised of myself (As in "Did I really just do that ? wow ") But you have the good sides of humans too | ||
|
[DUF]MethodMan
Germany1716 Posts
| ||
|
Slithe
United States985 Posts
On January 27 2010 02:56 PiLLs( SLiP) wrote: I think its hilarious he says" Women are materialistic prostitutes" Then goes on for five minutes on how he only likes a women for the way she looks. "Men are ignorant shallow bastards" Humans in general suck. All this really means to me is that women are smarter than men. Men are still stuck using physical features to try and determine effective mates, whereas women are using far more useful heuristics like social status and monetary wealth. The author of the essay is clearly having some kind of problems and thus feels the need to slander the entire female gender. | ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
On January 27 2010 02:42 Garnet wrote: It's true. They may be attracted to your physical appearance at first, but when she found out there's nothing special about you she will back off. That goes equally for men. Have you ever met or dated a girl that's gorgeous but you can't stand being with her because there's nothing special about her? This article is bullshit. | ||
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
On January 27 2010 02:26 mOnion wrote: this is trash articles like this that make farfetched statements are just there to be radical and grab attention and there's hardly any truth to them obviously women are attracted to men. don't be naive. Yes in the way the article described... | ||
|
Oracle
Canada411 Posts
On January 27 2010 02:36 Chef wrote: Radical? I'm pretty sure misogyny has been around for over 1000 years. What's been radical is the changes from might = right in technologically developed cultures that has allowed women to fight for their right to vote, to work whatever job they want (if they're qualified of course, and at least in theory), and just generally not being thought of as immediately inferior for no good reason (by at least the male population that isn't sexually frustrated). haha maybe you mistook this as a work of misogyny. I want to say this work is almost... satirical. I don't think he hates women, but merely strives to provide some thoughts on the men-women bond. Of course you can't generalize, but i'm sure there exists some inherent part of womenkind which mimics exactly what he proposes. | ||
|
Spike
United States1392 Posts
| ||
|
Alethios
New Zealand2765 Posts
| ||
|
Gigaudas
Sweden1213 Posts
I'm pretty sure that women are attracted to me in a way similar to the way that I'm attracted to them. | ||
|
Oracle
Canada411 Posts
On January 27 2010 03:20 Gigaudas wrote: I feel that the content of the OP could be used to "prove" the exact same thing about men. I'm pretty sure that women are attracted to me in a way similar to the way that I'm attracted to them. I think "prove" is an overstatement. This isn't some scientifical study, just some guys (satirical?) thoughts which lets people relate or draw their own conclusions. Did Patrick batemen really commit a series of murders? Does Keyser Soze actually exist? Is this guy serious? who knows. | ||
|
dcberkeley
Canada844 Posts
On January 27 2010 02:28 Koltz wrote: I think youre reading too much into it, I don't think he means to exclude that factor, but perhaps introduce this one which may be less obvious. Of course it's radical; that's what makes it genius. People thought einstein's early work was radical, pick up a northrop frye book and he'll make just as radical statements, read chompsky and youre headed for a world of controversy. It makes for good reading, see a pattern? Lol, radical = genius. Genius. | ||
|
Draconizard
628 Posts
However, I am not in the least bit surprised that so many of you agree with it. | ||
|
MorroW
Sweden3522 Posts
| ||
| ||
