EPTIt would probably help with new users registering so they can rate (although some might say we have too many new users ;-) ) and it would be a good way to tell if someone is a quality poster.
Post rating system
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
CoralReefer
Canada2069 Posts
It would probably help with new users registering so they can rate (although some might say we have too many new users ;-) ) and it would be a good way to tell if someone is a quality poster. | ||
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
| ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
I VOTE AGAINST | ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32278 Posts
| ||
|
oHInsane
France727 Posts
For new users, it is right that they don't know each people here but it is "their" job to get used to this beautiful world that tl is  | ||
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
here on tl.net, threads exist about a wide variety of inane, and useless bullshit, and were the staff to implement such a moderation system, well, i for one would probably use 4/5 points modding idiots/trolls to oblivion, and the odd 1 point for a good, informative post. threads would shrink pretty quick. [EDIT]Here i was speaking strictly about the general forum. the more i think about it though, the more i really believe that strategy / brood war / tournament could really benefit from this but maybe that'd be a good thing | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
On August 21 2006 02:01 Beyonder wrote: dont see the up side to all of this really, seems pretty frigging pointless. :x | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
| ||
|
RaGe
Belgium9950 Posts
dont see any other use though | ||
|
brian
United States9642 Posts
On August 21 2006 08:54 EvilTeletubby wrote: | ||
|
to miss the mark
Bosnia-Herzegovina1381 Posts
On August 21 2006 10:52 RaGe wrote: maybe we could depress reason away from this site with all the negative feedback with this function | ||
|
QuietIdiot
7004 Posts
| ||
|
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
| ||
|
red.venom
United States4651 Posts
| ||
|
Drowsy
United States4876 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
| ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4650 Posts
EDIT: Whoever change my icon to a Lurker permanently .. THANKS! | ||
|
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
| ||
|
sundance
Slovakia3201 Posts
And maybe for General forum too.Mods can mark thread as a expert topic and moderation will begin.So posters like WhatIsProtoss (aka i'm expert in every field) can be safely ignored. | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
On August 24 2006 01:07 sundance wrote: Implement it for strategy section only.It could be great improvment and it will surely prevent every inocent soul from taking Reasons posts seriously. And maybe for General forum too.Mods can mark thread as a expert topic and moderation will begin.So posters like WhatIsProtoss (aka i'm expert in every field) can be safely ignored. WhatIsProtoss seems like, for certain things, he knows what he's talking about. You just have to get over his attitude and his arrogance to see it.  | ||
|
sundance
Slovakia3201 Posts
But there are topics wehere he CLEARLY don't know what he is talking about. Example: On June 29 2006 21:51 WhatisProtoss wrote: Um, what are you talking about? C# is merely a "replacement" for Java. All programmers should know C++ and Java. C# is just a rewritten language based on Java. Don't spew random shit when you don't know what you're talking about. C++ is very important. The fact that YOU SAID people wanted Java/C# more than C++ tells me that you don't know that much. Companies want proficiency in C++ and Java. This example involves me just because it's easier to search for such a specific stuff. This clearly shows that he don't have fucking clue.He is not even close.He si living in 1998. There are more examples but i somewhat can't find them using search function  . | ||
|
CoralReefer
Canada2069 Posts
for the other sections, sure, it would be a popularity contest (i.e. sundance would always rate WhatIsProtoss' posts down just because they had a gay little fight before). but what's wrong with that? don't the disliked/annoying/stupid posters get banned in the end anyways? | ||
|
CoralReefer
Canada2069 Posts
On August 21 2006 06:28 CTStalker wrote: slashdot and digg have systems like this set in place because each thread is a discussion about a particular news story, and it's easy to be misled or misinformed by an errant post if you're unfamiliar with the topic. that is why moderators are supposed to make the good, on topic, correct posts easier to see. here on tl.net, threads exist about a wide variety of inane, and useless bullshit, and were the staff to implement such a moderation system, well, i for one would probably use 4/5 points modding idiots/trolls to oblivion, and the odd 1 point for a good, informative post. threads would shrink pretty quick. [EDIT]Here i was speaking strictly about the general forum. the more i think about it though, the more i really believe that strategy / brood war / tournament could really benefit from this but maybe that'd be a good thing i actually wouldn't like it if negatively modded posts didn't show up by default (except maybe in the strategy section). arguments are sometimes fun to read. | ||
|
sundance
Slovakia3201 Posts
On August 26 2006 19:51 ml1710 wrote: i agree that it might be a good idea for the strategy section, so that people would know the quality posts. for the other sections, sure, it would be a popularity contest (i.e. sundance would always rate WhatIsProtoss' posts down just because they had a gay little fight before). but what's wrong with that? don't the disliked/annoying/stupid posters get banned in the end anyways? haha you're right  | ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
I guess it would also work for the strategy section. | ||
|
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
On December 14 2005 17:36 BroOd wrote: Meat can you make a satellite that beams the threads right into our brains? im tired of typing | ||
|
LG)Sabbath
Argentina3024 Posts
| ||
intrigue
Washington, D.C9935 Posts
sundance get over your little hissy fit, jeez | ||
|
sundance
Slovakia3201 Posts
On September 03 2006 16:20 intrigue wrote: i hated whatisprotoss at first but i think he's fine now and what he says is all pretty good sundance get over your little hissy fit, jeez gtfo | ||
|
SCNewb
Canada2210 Posts
| ||
|
Yogurt
United States4258 Posts
On September 13 2006 14:11 StarcraftNewb wrote: I agree with Klogon.......it'd be useful if entire threads were rated I agree with you | ||
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
| ||
|
a-game
Canada5214 Posts
imo for people who aren't exactly pristine staff material, they should get like a faded blue text name or something, but no tl.net logo. based on these guys posting history making them representatives of tl.net is a mistake... | ||
|
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
If this was post rating, you would be down by 10. | ||
|
a-game
Canada5214 Posts
| ||
|
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
| ||
|
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
| ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On September 17 2006 22:13 a-game wrote: thanks, i'll remember to withold any feedback while posting in the feedback section hahahaha | ||
|
a-game
Canada5214 Posts
On September 17 2006 23:14 jkillashark wrote: I'm sorry if I was bad mannered somewhere else a-game. Now that I was graciously allowed to join TL.net as a new staff, I will try my best to be a better representative of TL. dude you handled that very graciously (you jacked my word damnit)... i am now %100 behind your stafff-hood, for what it matters lol  | ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
|
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
On September 17 2006 23:32 a-game wrote: dude you handled that very graciously (you jacked my word damnit)... i am now %100 behind your stafff-hood, for what it matters lol Lawl. I try not to flame people and be known more as a gm than bm. I flamed one or two people I think, most recently towards the general people who were bugging Pat about PGTour, but normally I don't flame people. | ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
On September 17 2006 23:32 a-game wrote: [removed quote within quote] dude you handled that very graciously (you jacked my word damnit)... i am now %100 behind your stafff-hood, for what it matters lol Get a room please. Vomit @ you two. I say while we're at it, make everything rate-able. Threads, Posts, Posters, Polls, Games, etc. And yeah, rating stuff is utter nonsense. Only in the strategy forum would it be totally useless like no one else has pointed out. And why do we even need to rate posts and threads? Are we that desperate for that one golden post etc? Oh nO~ OH nO~~ I mised a joke...fuqqqqq | ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
i'm uncircumcized you see | ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
how about allowing users to give kudos to certain posts... but needing a certain number of posts/time on the site to be able to give it out... /random idea | ||
|
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
| ||
|
Wasabi
United States3085 Posts
| ||
| ||
