[T] Hajime no Ippo Maifa - Page 145
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
On April 30 2015 02:39 Sepulchre wrote: I'm not opposed to fighting against Damdred as well. I can take anybody. I'm not afraid to fight two people at once either. Bring it on. Can you explain your full role | ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
On April 30 2015 03:58 indignant wrote: What are you talking about? FF was on bats and not on damdred. I don't even know what damdred has to do with all of this. The vote justification thing is not very conclusive in my opinion. Oh ya ff spewed bats mafia. I totally forgot about that gg bats. | ||
indignant
1028 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
I know im not gonna convince people on this read but its a point against bats. This is how I imagine their thought process goes. "well i dont care who gets lynch so ill have my useless vote land on a mafia so I can bring it up later" | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On April 30 2015 04:49 sicklucker wrote: I see bad mafia players go off wagon to vote a partner all the time. I used this to ping out ritoky/super in an old game. I know im not gonna convince people on this read but its a point against bats. This is how I imagine their thought process goes. "well i dont care who gets lynch so ill have my useless vote land on a mafia so I can bring it up later" literally 100% wifom | ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
but you're also wrong - mafia players do it to townies all the time too | ||
indignant
1028 Posts
On April 30 2015 04:49 sicklucker wrote: I see bad mafia players go off wagon to vote a partner all the time. I used this to ping out ritoky/super in an old game. I know im not gonna convince people on this read but its a point against bats. This is how I imagine their thought process goes. "well i dont care who gets lynch so ill have my useless vote land on a mafia so I can bring it up later" Possible but there is no reason to assume this is the case. + Show Spoiler + It's also funny how you keep using "I would do this/I did this as mafia" arguments because 1) noone plays like you do 2) you literally already lied about what you do as mafia in this game. | ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
indignant
1028 Posts
On April 30 2015 04:53 sicklucker wrote: Altho marv I do like your town read on "bats" its one of the better reads I saw. The problem is he denies hes "bats" so I cant rly use it wat | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
On April 29 2015 17:51 Jean Valjean wrote: I may be overreacting here so I'm hoping someone actually gives enough shits to step in and comment. This single read erodes whatever town lean I had on LS based off of Holyflare's point regarding Lightningstrike's reaction to rsoultin giving up. I'm going to break it down. [b]I'm not Bats.[b/] Good, my case on Breshke was a strong one. No I haven't. Unless meh means something entirely different where LS comes from. I have been open to challenges about my reads, I have actively presented information and ideas to the thread, including multiple opinions about players backed up by analysis or explanation of why I think what I think. At best it's insulting that he thinks my game has been meh, at worst it simply means he has no idea and "meh" is an easy word to throw in there when talking about a no name player. No I haven't been bad. Yes we don't know if my #1 scumread backed by a strong case is mafia, but we do know that my #2 scumread, also backed by a very strong and factually correct case was mafia. I ended up voting on the correct wagon because of precisely this, I am willing to compromise and my intentions were clear through my posts all throughout day 1. Again, at best this is insulting, and at worst he's just throwing it out there because he hasn't read a single word I've said. If we ignore the fact that I am not batsnacks, even if I was what the hell would this sentence have to do with his read on me? Why does this matter? Let's pretend LS hadn't written anything about bats because obviously anything written about bats is both irrelevant to the case at hand and doesn't apply to me, being not bats. So what's left of LS's read on me? I'll post it again. Why not just straight up admit he hasn't read me instead of posting that is clearly lying on his part. Both of the statement (meh and bad) can be proven to be false by reading my filter, yet he posts them anyway. The following are the possible reasons for posting what he posted in his list: #1: He wants to antagonize me to try to get me to respond and get a read on me. #2: He wants to antagonize me because he's a massive dick #3: He hasn't read anything I've said but felt like he needed to have an opinion on me. I see no indication that #1 is true because he threw out a bunch of other "meh" reads in his list. I cannot comment on all of those simply because I don't have the in-depth analysis of everyone involved to be qualified to speak about it. Maybe LS is just an asshole of a player, but I haven't gotten that feeling from his posting so that leaves me to conclude the correct conclusion is #3. In which case he is mafia because he is making up reads. I'm voting LS. | ||
sicklucker
Canada16986 Posts
| ||
Inspector Javert
314 Posts
I also said in some game a while ago that one of my favorite songs was Stars from les mis. | ||
indignant
1028 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On April 30 2015 04:57 indignant wrote: Now look again at who posted this SL. I am sure you will find your mistake. *shakes head slowly, despairingly* | ||
| ||