| Forum Index > BW General |
|
JMave
Singapore1806 Posts
EDIT: I guess famous isn't the right word. I'm saying something like as renowned as SC is today. Poll: Would you.. (Vote): Still play SC:BW hardcore but playing SC2 just for fun? (Vote): Go hardcore SC2 and play BW a little? (Vote): Strike a balance between both? | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
QuietIdiot
7004 Posts
Both will co-exist, the latter will get more exposure in competition, the old will still be around but not as much public sponsorship. | ||
|
statix
United States1760 Posts
| ||
|
pubbanana
United States3063 Posts
| ||
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
| ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
| ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
I believe the foreign scene will become as strong as the 1.6 scene is right now, with WC3 players making a transition to SC2 and major gaming orgas picking up SC2 teams (SK-gaming,fnatic, MYM, creating a massive fanbase. The korean scene i have no idea about, isn't it up to kespa if they want to make the change given the game is good enough? I dont believe the teams/individual players have much say if kespa decides to switch track. | ||
|
Ki_Do
Korea (South)981 Posts
On November 14 2008 09:49 Senx wrote: SC2 will be good enough to play, no doubt. And that is where everyone will be playing and where all the tournaments will be so.. SC2 hardcore > sc:bw for fun so certain you are im almost crying wishing ur words to became true, but it still needs a lot of things to reach that point | ||
|
Manowarrior
United States159 Posts
So I guess, it depends on why it's more popular. Because it's easy as #@!$ and all the casuals are loving the new zero clutter maps? Or because it's balanced, extremely fun to watch competitive pro gaming equal to that of its predecessor, or because the skill gap isn't narrowed so Starcraft still remiains easytolearn/impossibletomaster? | ||
GTR
51706 Posts
Inside Korea though? Who knows. | ||
|
Licmyobelisk
Philippines3682 Posts
The thing is we should all stop for a moment, think clearly that starcraft 2 is a new game to master. She's a new love that we have found because the former is having a great relationship with her korean boyfriends. Ok, I'll go hardcore on sc2 and play sc:bw for fun  | ||
|
lokiM
United States3407 Posts
On November 14 2008 09:37 QuietIdiot wrote: cs 1.6 vs cs:source imo. Both will co-exist, the latter will get more exposure in competition, the old will still be around but not as much public sponsorship. cs 1.6 has more 'public sponsorship' the only thing source has is CGS | ||
|
BalliSLife
1339 Posts
| ||
|
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
| ||
|
liger13
United States1060 Posts
 | ||
|
QuietIdiot
7004 Posts
On November 14 2008 11:20 lokiM wrote: cs 1.6 has more 'public sponsorship' the only thing source has is CGS Oo yeah, your right, someone sent me a PM and clarified it. I guess people really strive for it. | ||
|
prOxi.swAMi
Australia3091 Posts
| ||
|
Not_Computer
Canada2277 Posts
competitively and progaming wise, or like, just everyone ends up playing it because its addictive/cool (like WoW) | ||
|
Licmyobelisk
Philippines3682 Posts
so we have the wc3 which in turn created dota to still become successful. (now all people are knows dota, even my girl plays with) As per said by developers that the previous units from sc:bw will still be in the SC2. Therefore, if someone kind soul will be so gracious enough to create a SC:BW inside SC2 in order for our beloved SC:BW players to transition themselves to because in the modified version of SC2, we have our beloved SC:BW which has the same mechanics same units same everything (well, I hope it doesn't have the MBS because it is SC:BW inside SC2) except that is beautifully drawn since it uses the SC2 engine. Is this a good idea or just plain bad!? I will create a thread like this on the SC2 Index if no one has. | ||
| ||
|
|
KCM Race Survival
IntoTheTV X SOOP
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
OSC
OSC
GSL
Epic.LAN
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
Epic.LAN
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
