EPT86.121.175.144:1090 or TLnet.mine.nu:1090, use a client like DC++ for best results, also forward ports etc etc.
For safety sakes, please put your name as your TL.net username.
TL DC+ VOD Hub?
| Forum Index > BW General |
GTR
51544 Posts
86.121.175.144:1090 or TLnet.mine.nu:1090, use a client like DC++ for best results, also forward ports etc etc. For safety sakes, please put your name as your TL.net username. | ||
|
Pressure
7326 Posts
2nded. i also got a 250GB external about 2 months ago we're twins! | ||
|
DeadVessel
United States6269 Posts
| ||
|
drift0ut
United Kingdom691 Posts
| ||
|
ketomai
United States2789 Posts
| ||
|
FalliNinLove
Slovakia865 Posts
| ||
|
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
I have a 400gb just waiting to be filled with VODs <3 edit: Exactly how does the hub work? My brother had DC++ and he downloaded like 5 trillion music files and his speed was off the wall :O Is this like torrent or something? | ||
Xeofreestyler
Belgium6774 Posts
| ||
|
Pressure
7326 Posts
we need one of those | ||
|
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
On January 08 2008 10:03 Xeofreestyler wrote: No its kinda like IRC but you each have filelists that are sortof 'submitted' to the room and you can just easiliy search anything and download it p2p OH MAN I'M SO HYPED UP NOW Somebody get all the Proleague VODs so I can watch them all day -_- | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
 Hmm, if this happens I'll need an external HD as well.  We should share replays as well on the hub. | ||
|
GTR
51544 Posts
I have a shitty connection so don't look at me. | ||
|
uppTagg
Sweden473 Posts
| ||
|
Woyn
United Kingdom1628 Posts
| ||
|
Resonate
United Kingdom8402 Posts
| ||
zatic
Zurich15361 Posts
I would rather suggest putting up a proper tracker / indexer to make it easy(ier) to search for files. Edit: 5 min of googling strongly suggest to me to forget about direct connect, as it is, in fact, sooo 20th century. Bittorrent is superior in any way. | ||
|
chiflutz
Romania1025 Posts
Hosting one isn't a problem, it doesn't require much bandwidth. But we can do something a bit less technical - use IRC to share them. The concept is similar, except it's done on an IRC channel. You need to setup a search bot and people that want to share get a script for their client. People search and download via DCC. It's more copy/paste, as opposed to point-and-click for DC clients. Either way, the idea sounds fine. Want me to do some searching and help set it up, just say so. I know lots of people on IRC have bots up and running. | ||
|
alffla
Hong Kong20321 Posts
| ||
|
zatic
Zurich15361 Posts
On January 09 2008 02:38 chiflutz wrote: Yes, bittorrent is a far more efficient data distribution technology, but the problem with all torrent trackers is that torrents die, i.e. aren't seeded anymore after a certain amount of time. How is this different from ANY p2p system? As long as users share (seed) the better protocol yields better results. If users don't share (seed) no protocol whatsorever will help. Hosting one isn't a problem, it doesn't require much bandwidth. But we can do something a bit less technical - use IRC to share them. (Number of users/20)^2 kbit/s - that's for the protocol alone, without any data transfer. Don't get me wrong, if it works I won't mind at all, I'd love such a service! :-) But I seriously doubt it will. | ||
KwarK
United States43582 Posts
| ||
| ||
