|
|
|
|
|
On March 18 2018 11:05 disformation wrote:
is it time to start with the pregame excuses yet?
I work during the week and probably will only really have a few hours each night to play.
|
Moosy I’m going to try my best to assess you fairly,
but damn you’re like a hyperactive kid in a Candy store.
But you come into the thread saying you need someone to explain the setup because you can’t be arsed to read it....after you /out earlier because of number of players.
Scum leaning on you for this reason.
|
On March 20 2018 08:15 Holyflare wrote:
I scum read kelsier for actually giving a shit
Is this joke or serious? if serious, can you give me some context?
|
On March 20 2018 08:57 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 08:09 ExO_ wrote:
Moosy I’m going to try my best to assess you fairly,
but damn you’re like a hyperactive kid in a Candy store.
But you come into the thread saying you need someone to explain the setup because you can’t be arsed to read it....after you /out earlier because of number of players.
Scum leaning on you for this reason. I think this is an awful reason to scumread Moosy. ExO picked the first inconsistency he could find. And what is it even? Moosy scum lean cause he wanted setup explained but he /outed earlier because of the amount of players and if he does the first he can't do the latter??? I don't even see the connection between the two sentences.
My theory is if he’s /outing because of number of players he’s probably read the setup. And on a personal note it annoys me how moosy can take the time to post a bunch of filler candy crap, but not read the setup
|
On March 20 2018 08:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 08:35 KelsierSC wrote:
I think rayn has the best point so far by a long way,
mocsta has posted dumb shit and is definitely failing the fucktard test Am i missing something because i don't know what my point you are referring to is? I don't think anything Mocsta has posted makes him anything.
@KelsierSC what point did Rayn have that was the best by a long way?
|
On March 20 2018 08:44 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Now you got me even more confused. point 1. Your question of holyflares "read" on me is the best thing so far. point 2. mocsta is making bad "fucktard" posts.
Rayn never made that second point did he? You’re putting words in his mouth and then agreeing with them....what I dont understand is why. I don’t like it — Scum reading Kelsier.
Though I’ll admit I’m not a fan of HF’s posts...I think HF is either VT or scum — not sure which.
|
On March 20 2018 10:06 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 09:42 disformation wrote:
just for the record: moosy asking bout the setup is fairly nai. totally in his town range. ##vote disformationIt's ok. You tried.
...why the vote for disinfo here?
|
On March 20 2018 11:04 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 10:57 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:44 KelsierSC wrote:On March 20 2018 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Now you got me even more confused. point 1. Your question of holyflares "read" on me is the best thing so far. point 2. mocsta is making bad "fucktard" posts. Rayn never made that second point did he? You’re putting words in his mouth and then agreeing with them....what I dont understand is why. I don’t like it — Scum reading Kelsier. Though I’ll admit I’m not a fan of HF’s posts...I think HF is either VT or scum — not sure which. ????????? What a contrived way of saying nothing
Either he’s VT and doesn’t care enough to try, or scum and not saying much
|
On March 20 2018 11:05 Vivax wrote:
And you still didn't explain why what you said makes moosy mafia.
Cause it doesn't and you also have no clue how you got to say that.
Again, if he knows the setup, posting asking to explain it is scummy to me.
Do you have any reads on anybody else? Or anything else? or are you just gonna yolo tunnel me as your one contribution?
|
On March 20 2018 11:22 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 11:12 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 11:04 Vivax wrote:On March 20 2018 10:57 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:44 KelsierSC wrote:On March 20 2018 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Now you got me even more confused. point 1. Your question of holyflares "read" on me is the best thing so far. point 2. mocsta is making bad "fucktard" posts. Rayn never made that second point did he? You’re putting words in his mouth and then agreeing with them....what I dont understand is why. I don’t like it — Scum reading Kelsier. Though I’ll admit I’m not a fan of HF’s posts...I think HF is either VT or scum — not sure which. ????????? What a contrived way of saying nothing Either he’s VT and doesn’t care enough to try, or scum and not saying much And how does that further your goal of finding scum if that can be said for anyone else in the game? IE he's town or mafia. That much is obvious. Anyone is town or mafia. The addendums you just put there don't change the fact that it's a completely pointless statement to make?
He’s VT or mafia — not blue. That’s the distinction here
|
On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again.
I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this.
Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me.
|
On March 20 2018 17:39 KelsierSC wrote:
I caught up.
I am going to change my opinion of Mocsta, his first posts were pretty pointless but he has added some decent content. He made a good point about exo just after I had posted it and went ot bed so we were thinking on the same lines, his post about noobking appearing just to defend and I really like the scum read on ticktock.
For ticktock I have a few questions. You accused me of jumping on everything can you say what I jumped on exactly and which of those were bad reads? as for ticktock making his push on exo. It has the feeling of trying to get on a bandwagon, like there were some good things against exo but it was like he jumped on a post and tried to paint it scummy when it wasn't actually that bad.
For exo himself, I do have a scum lean I guess I would want to know if his read on me has changed. Some of exo's posts seem plausible like his defence of his moosy read was possibly ok..im rambling on this.
I want to read the noobkin, conversion, rayn hf stuff again because it feels important and I want to understand it, posting this to get my ideas out.
Oh and I don't like Slam but can't say anymoer than "feels"
want to ask vivax on how he feels about ticktock and NK
Before I answer whether or not my read on you has changed — can you tell me why this is such a determining factor for figuring out your read on me?
|
On March 20 2018 08:35 KelsierSC wrote:
I think rayn has the best point so far by a long way,
mocsta has posted dumb shit and is definitely failing the fucktard test
This is his post — by the time he posted this you had said nothing about HF, or am I missing something here?
|
Okay I see now. Though the way your post read it did seem like you were trying to call mocsta bad but hide behind rayn for something he never said.
I have to re-evaluate my read on you with this in mind.
|
On March 20 2018 18:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 18:02 Holyflare wrote:On March 20 2018 17:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 17:47 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again. I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this. Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me. His "best point" was a comment to me telling Holyflare's Kelsier read is completely crap, something you were interested in earlier but somehow managed to miss this, twice....... I also thought he was referencing your mocsta point. You apparently did too because you said "what mocsta point" The thing is if he really cared about this he would go read my filter and maybe he missed my post on Kelsier earlier but there is no way he goes read my filter and misses it the second time around.
I did reread your filter. However I didn’t make the connection here.
That being said, Kelsier, as of right now what’s your read on HF?
|
On March 20 2018 18:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 18:07 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 18:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 18:02 Holyflare wrote:On March 20 2018 17:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 17:47 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again. I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this. Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me. His "best point" was a comment to me telling Holyflare's Kelsier read is completely crap, something you were interested in earlier but somehow managed to miss this, twice....... I also thought he was referencing your mocsta point. You apparently did too because you said "what mocsta point" The thing is if he really cared about this he would go read my filter and maybe he missed my post on Kelsier earlier but there is no way he goes read my filter and misses it the second time around. I did reread your filter. However I didn’t make the connection here. That being said, Kelsier, as of right now what’s your read on HF? Okay let's makje it very simple, if what you say is true why do you after reading this: Show nested quote +Normally i wouldn't bother but i don't wanna read pages of useless discussion when the game before the last one Kelsier had ~30 posts D1, managed to find 2 mafia in his 2 mafia reads, shot mafia on N1 and got shot on N1 so he is perfectly capable of trying and also playing well doing so. I don't know where you get what you're smoking since you played that game. post this: Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 10:44 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 08:35 KelsierSC wrote:
I think rayn has the best point so far by a long way,
mocsta has posted dumb shit and is definitely failing the fucktard test Am i missing something because i don't know what my point you are referring to is? I don't think anything Mocsta has posted makes him anything. @KelsierSC what point did Rayn have that was the best by a long way? especially since you say: Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 10:57 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:44 KelsierSC wrote:On March 20 2018 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Now you got me even more confused. point 1. Your question of holyflares "read" on me is the best thing so far. point 2. mocsta is making bad "fucktard" posts. Rayn never made that second point did he? You’re putting words in his mouth and then agreeing with them....what I dont understand is why. I don’t like it — Scum reading Kelsier. Though I’ll admit I’m not a fan of HF’s posts...I think HF is either VT or scum — not sure which. And now you said you associated Kelsier's post with the Mocsta thing? The logical conclusion for you to make is to assume his "good point" refers to the Kelsier/Holyflare thing but instead you now say you associated it it with the Mocsta thing which you said you didn't earlier. uh oh...
I posted as I read the thread. You ask why I made my first post, and then quote the post I made after it (as I read more). Long story short, when I open up your filter I didn’t notice your comment of “not true tho” is refering to the HF thing.
The point I was making was that Keisler looked like he was trying to claim you made a read on mocsta and was agreeing with it, rather than making a read on mocsta on his own.
|
On March 20 2018 19:00 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 18:46 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 18:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 18:07 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 18:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 18:02 Holyflare wrote:On March 20 2018 17:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 17:47 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:
[quote]Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up.
In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread.
Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match.
I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again. I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this. Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me. His "best point" was a comment to me telling Holyflare's Kelsier read is completely crap, something you were interested in earlier but somehow managed to miss this, twice....... I also thought he was referencing your mocsta point. You apparently did too because you said "what mocsta point" The thing is if he really cared about this he would go read my filter and maybe he missed my post on Kelsier earlier but there is no way he goes read my filter and misses it the second time around. I did reread your filter. However I didn’t make the connection here. That being said, Kelsier, as of right now what’s your read on HF? Okay let's makje it very simple, if what you say is true why do you after reading this: Normally i wouldn't bother but i don't wanna read pages of useless discussion when the game before the last one Kelsier had ~30 posts D1, managed to find 2 mafia in his 2 mafia reads, shot mafia on N1 and got shot on N1 so he is perfectly capable of trying and also playing well doing so. I don't know where you get what you're smoking since you played that game. post this: On March 20 2018 10:44 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 08:35 KelsierSC wrote:
I think rayn has the best point so far by a long way,
mocsta has posted dumb shit and is definitely failing the fucktard test Am i missing something because i don't know what my point you are referring to is? I don't think anything Mocsta has posted makes him anything. @KelsierSC what point did Rayn have that was the best by a long way? especially since you say: On March 20 2018 10:57 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:44 KelsierSC wrote:On March 20 2018 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Now you got me even more confused. point 1. Your question of holyflares "read" on me is the best thing so far. point 2. mocsta is making bad "fucktard" posts. Rayn never made that second point did he? You’re putting words in his mouth and then agreeing with them....what I dont understand is why. I don’t like it — Scum reading Kelsier. Though I’ll admit I’m not a fan of HF’s posts...I think HF is either VT or scum — not sure which. And now you said you associated Kelsier's post with the Mocsta thing? The logical conclusion for you to make is to assume his "good point" refers to the Kelsier/Holyflare thing but instead you now say you associated it it with the Mocsta thing which you said you didn't earlier. uh oh... I posted as I read the thread. You ask why I made my first post, and then quote the post I made after it (as I read more). Long story short, when I open up your filter I didn’t notice your comment of “not true tho” is refering to the HF thing. The point I was making was that Keisler looked like he was trying to claim you made a read on mocsta and was agreeing with it, rather than making a read on mocsta on his own. I am so confused What is the order of events. You saw I had made a post saying rayn's idea was good (referring to his HF post) and that mocsta was scummy. However you thought I was trying to say that rayn had made a point about mocsta being scum. This was despite the conversation rayn and I had in the thread immediately after these posts where I clarified my point. This was also after you reread rayn's filter which contains posts about hf and his conversation with me. Furthermore you were after context about HF's read on me which is what rayn was talking about. I don't know how you missed it. What did you think his "not true tho" comment is referring to? Can you just break down what was going through your brain because I just want to call you scum here and be done with it.
Long Story short — your initial post made it look like you were trying to claim rayn made a point about Mocsta when he did it. Your followup post made it look like you were back pedalling on this idea. I didn’t read super closely because I was more concerned with calling you out for this than your defense of it.
Now you can believe me or you can think somehow this makes me scum — I think we’ve spent a lot of time and it’s stopped serving a good purpose.
As for my read on you now — I think you’ve seemed awfully concerned with making sure everyone is town reading you moreso than scum hunting, but it’s hard for me to scum read you based on the length of posts and amount you are putting in to understand situations. I don’t think you can be a D1 lynch.
|
*ebwop: when he did it, should be when he didn’t
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
