|
On February 27 2014 04:36 Palmar wrote:
nit to mention this game will definitely be very friendly for a first time forum player. slam is a chill guy, ve and I always get along great in games and bh is basically a model citizen of tl mafia. polite calm and helpful. dandel is pretty cool too.
/in
^_^
now we only need geript, marv and DarthPunk.
|
Well if townies get themselves modkilled this game it's not gonna be because of lurking and it's gonna be fun instead. 
|
austin let's talk with MSpaint pictures all game?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Palmar are you around?
|
On March 04 2014 18:00 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 17:56 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'll do at the very least one of those things tomorrow. Please do. This game doesn't have a ton of quality posters and more than it's fair share of trolls. You know this and you know that if you're town we absolutely need you to contribute to the game. If you disappear or blend in with little opinions throughout the early game, I _will_ policy lynch you.
I would like you to elaborate on this post a bit more.
|
Yes Slam is most likely town.
|
That's basically why i asked about it (the VE thing, i got that). But another thing is who do you think are the people not quality posters?
|
Yeah that's mainly why i asked. I can now see better what you were most likely thinking because i didn't find many incoherent people, especially because i like Oats and Slam this game. Oats had a really good point on Austin imo.
We lynch Grackaroni if he decides to troll, no fucking trolling because when he tries to play he is actually good or readable if he is mafia.
I am looking forward to robik/boone/killing interactions, i WOULD think they can read each other to some extent, and rob seems to be doing a good job there (also might add GGtemplar here). Rob however knows how he played in the last game so i would not draw any definite conclusions about it yet. I wanna see how that all unfolds.
justanothertownie is decent. Also posts a decent amount as either alignment and i think he is quite readable. I'd put him into same category as non-troll!Grack.
Dandel we just figure out if he is scum or town and kill him if he is scum.
|
On March 04 2014 19:08 Palmar wrote:Do you have any other reads?
Austin top scumread atm but i need to hear more from him.
|
On March 04 2014 19:21 Palmar wrote:
I like your plan.
The one thing that stood out in your post is your thoughts on ggtemplar. I have no reason to believe anything he says until he starts explaining his thought process. These new kids all keep talking about "I'm reading you scum" or "I'm reading you town" but there seems to be little behind those reads except some vague meta feels.
The point is that's what they do in video mafia. Draw reactions, fake drawing reactions etc. IT's really easy to attack them but it's not alignment indicative yet. They have their own way of getting reads and/or starting the game and it's easy to call them out for it but it does not achieve anything because they would do that as either alignment.
You just get a shitfest which ends up in TL guys accusing them and the other way around.
At least Robik was able to "adjust" to forum mafia play a bit after the game start so that's what i am expecting from him and from other people. I know GGtemplar has played many games here and he seems the most "off" from the group because that's not what he usually does.
I actually want to ask GGtemplar why did you vote for the people you voted for?
|
EBWOP: ...i except also from other video mafia players to do so too.
|
Robik why are you picking on boone?
Can you give me a train of thought what she's doing in your opinion?
|
On March 04 2014 20:24 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 19:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Robik why are you picking on boone?
Can you give me a train of thought what she's doing in your opinion? Do you not think his point on boone is fair?
Not necessarily. I might know what he is after but i am not sure.
On March 04 2014 21:17 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 19:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 04 2014 19:08 Palmar wrote:On March 04 2014 18:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes Slam is most likely town. Do you have any other reads? Austin top scumread atm but i need to hear more from him. Would you mind explaining? I get the slam read, just the austin read.
I liked Oats' point on him as i said. I don't know, why are you asking this, was i not clear enough? That's like the only thing that stood out for me besides what i have talking about / asking in thread but it's not enough for me to call austin totally scum for it, especially considering i have a history of totally misreading him in exactly 100% of our games together.
|
Let's talk about it after robik answers me okay?
I think Dandel is town what do you think?
|
Yes he is a troll but there is also this thing between his town ans scum play whereas as scum he only trolls and as town he trolls and actually forms reads and says stuff. Do you think he hasn't said anything useful that counts as contributing?
|
On March 04 2014 21:07 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 21:03 justanothertownie wrote:
Random lynching is a good discussion starter but a terrible play itself while policy lynching has it's merits. Well that is just wrong
Like this post is really good in my opinion because JAT's post is really bad.
|
On March 04 2014 22:06 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 21:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 04 2014 20:24 Palmar wrote:On March 04 2014 19:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Robik why are you picking on boone?
Can you give me a train of thought what she's doing in your opinion? Do you not think his point on boone is fair? Not necessarily. I might know what he is after but i am not sure. On March 04 2014 21:17 justanothertownie wrote:On March 04 2014 19:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 04 2014 19:08 Palmar wrote:On March 04 2014 18:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes Slam is most likely town. Do you have any other reads? Austin top scumread atm but i need to hear more from him. Would you mind explaining? I get the slam read, just the austin read. I liked Oats' point on him as i said. I don't know, why are you asking this, was i not clear enough? That's like the only thing that stood out for me besides what i have talking about / asking in thread but it's not enough for me to call austin totally scum for it, especially considering i have a history of totally misreading him in exactly 100% of our games together. Hm, ok. I didn't remember that. Also I think it is a pretty weak reason for a scumread. Especially since what oats said is not true.
What have i missed, explain please.
|
On March 04 2014 22:10 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 22:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 04 2014 21:07 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:03 justanothertownie wrote:
Random lynching is a good discussion starter but a terrible play itself while policy lynching has it's merits. Well that is just wrong Like this post is really good in my opinion because JAT's post is really bad. Why is it good? What does it achieve?
Random lynching can't be a good discussion starter if it's terrible play. That's just not possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i58.tinypic.com/2ccqxbo.png)
![[image loading]](http://i59.tinypic.com/5aq0av.png)
