World Heavyweight Championship mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
The reason we use the absolute TL post number is that posts are constantly being made, so the number is truly random. We turn it into a number 1-9 by taking that number mod 9. What is mod? effectively, it's the remainder after division. For example. 10 mod 9 = 1. 11 mod 9 = 2. 18 mod 9 = 0. 19 mod 9 = 1. and so on. Basically, this generates a random number 1 through 9. I am in favor of the random lynch (though am somewhat interested in a policy lynch today as well-- TL does not do this enough. I will start off by voting for the random lynched based on THIS POST. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
##vote Oatsmaster | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Maybe, maybe not, but you also state you're not willing to "randomly lynch someone" earlier on. So which is it? Is my vote random, or isn't it random? Are you casting doubt on it because you really doubt it? Do you have a problem with a true RNG in general (as you imply in your second post) or do you think I failed to appropriately RNG (as you imply later)? You can't both say "I won't vote Oats because I don't randomly vote" AND "the oats vote isn't random"... | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Well, first off, I'm talking to people who aren't Oats and are town. You personally know that of the 8 non-you players, 2 are scum. So you'd think it would be a 2/8 chance of an RNG hitting scum. Pretty lame right? WRONG. If the RNG is on the doctor and the lynch starts to gather steam, he'll surely claim. This means that the doctor isn't even in the lynch pool, and we can roll again for a new RNG. this means we can discount one town player from our odds, meaning that you have a 2/7 (over 30%!) chance of lynching scum with RNG! | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Here's what you need to do: tell me what you think of Risen based on that post, and his interactions with me. Give a read on me too (with reasons!) while you're at it. Otherwise I think I've found a better target than Oats. ##FoS Holyflare | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On October 02 2013 12:54 Oatsmaster wrote: So with this RNG lynch, we can lose our power roles day 1! Yeah that sounds awesome to get a slightly increased chance to lynch scum day 1. Also that 2/8 thing is bullshit, because the lynch could be anyone of us therefore its 2/9. Right, but from the point of view of a town player, 2 of the 8 non-you players was scum. If the RNG landed on me I'd simply not support it. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On October 02 2013 13:03 Risen wrote: I don't have a problem with RNG to generate discussion, I have a problem with calling it reasonable. Policy anything isn't very reasonable. I didn't understand his post and thought he could manipulate it. I was wrong, but I still don't know how he got his number. The # sign in the top right of his post goes to the absolute what how? He says top left, but there's nothing there. Meta is a bad way to play mafia. I hate meta. People are aware of their "metas". Asking someone to give you people's metas means you aren't objectively looking at people's posting style, you're looking at them through a filter. And stifle discussion? I haven't stifled anything. Top right, whatever, you get the idea. Right click the # button in the top right of the post. come on man can't you find the # | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Laughable, like your play this game. | ||
| ||