|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
Alrighty, time for my first game.
/in
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
Lynching lurkers sounds like a good plan, what are we thinking for activity then? Obviously everyone has to post at least once a day but people could post more whilst dodging questions or important issues.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
This makes sense, but what about people who are almost lurking? For example those who do post, but still not enough to have any decent thoughts?
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
I have to agree with jampidampi on Vayne, both of his posts are general comments, neither contribute to important discussion on day 1.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 04 2013 18:38 jampidampi wrote:Show nested quote +On May 04 2013 18:30 Targe wrote: I have to agree with jampidampi on Vayne, both of his posts are general comments, neither contribute to important discussion on day 1. Does that make him scum in your eyes?
You cannot base someone being scum off two posts, but he isn't off to a good start if he's trying to prove he's not, he's no.1 scum for me for now.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 04 2013 23:55 Sugarfluff wrote:For record I was asleep when the game started The votes had nothing to do with why I started posting when I did, but the tactic might still be viable I suppose.
I was asleep too! You're only like 2 hours ahead of me :p
Jokes aside I still think we should put pressure on lurkers though, I'll put my vote on Flowcaster for now.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
I'm still waiting for what shirokami and flowcaster have to say, shirokami sounds like he's made some interesting analysis with all his reading.
Also, I don't think jampi is acting like scum, he's talking sense with how scum can abuse the lynch policy.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 05 2013 11:50 Spicydinosaur wrote:shirokami is troubling me greatly. Aside from the lack of content in his posts, the only things the posts say are that he is postponing his analysis/discussion. Show nested quote +On May 04 2013 21:25 shirokami wrote: Yo yo.
So about the LAL. It's good for the reason that there are zero reasons to lurk in a thread-only game.
Also I will only have my phone until tomorrow, so my posts today may lack some. Show nested quote +On May 05 2013 06:44 shirokami wrote: Yo yo.
So I have been reading filters (god I love this filter thing) and I have some opinions but I will contribute more in about 19hours when I get back to my key and mouseboard.
I don't want to say something now because I want to tell you why and my nexus 4 is only good for reading, not writing.
Keep the text flowing so we get a good D1 and enough to lynch scum. He claims his phone is only good for writing, yet his punctuation doesn't that bad. This feels like it comes off as a stall tactic which is not helpful at all. Even if it might be difficult to type, he should have at least posted something beneficial. Perhaps when his "analysis" comes, my mind will change, but for now, he's close to the top of my list.
Just noticed this post, I don't think shirokami is scum right now, grammar and spelling is done for you on a phone and it's hard to write long posts, hopefully he can get his word across before it's time to vote.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 05 2013 16:46 Sugarfluff wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2013 11:09 calgar wrote:On May 04 2013 17:23 Sugarfluff wrote: For me it's the attitude towards not lynching on the first day. I do think we should lynch, cause as I said I think mafia can use the extra time more, as well as the serial killer. This is my first game though so I'm not sure if not lynching on day 1 is a common strategy, if so I'd love to hear the reasons behind it. As far as not lynching goes - it's absolutely terrible and town should never entertain this idea. End of story, no need to discuss something useless like this or hear reasons. I dislike how you're trying to imply uncertainty in your decisions and what you say. I get you logic except this part. I specifically stated that I didn't know if it was useless. What if it wasn't useless, should I not learn it? And you should always get reasons for everything. Which is why Vaynes vote for Targe is just another suspicious move on his part, however right it may be the logic needs to be there and the reasons need to be known. Anyway, all of JarJarDrinks posts so far have been concerning policy lynching. No attempts at anything else, and if he really felt so strongly about the policy he would have voted, not spent all his posts discussing whether or not we should. My vote is for him.
He's assuming that the reasoning is obvious I guess, there is no reason not to lynch, you have moderate odds to get a mafia even by chance and if there are votes on mafia member it pressures them into acting.
Vayne's free to vote for me as no one isn't suspect on D1, he obviously has some logic behind his post but he hasn't shared it just yet.
I'm interested in what Jarjar is going to do, I think the conclusion has been reached that we won't policy lynch? Correct me if I'm wrong. You're right about his posts only concerning policy lynches though, he hasn't put forward any arguments on people and seems to be commenting on general topics only, activity like that is indicative of scum or SK.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 06 2013 03:00 nobodywonder wrote:@ spicydinosaur why didn't you vote for shirokami? why vote for flowcaster? Show nested quote +On May 05 2013 11:50 Spicydinosaur wrote:shirokami is troubling me greatly. Aside from the lack of content in his posts, the only things the posts say are that he is postponing his analysis/discussion. On May 04 2013 21:25 shirokami wrote: Yo yo.
So about the LAL. It's good for the reason that there are zero reasons to lurk in a thread-only game.
Also I will only have my phone until tomorrow, so my posts today may lack some. On May 05 2013 06:44 shirokami wrote: Yo yo.
So I have been reading filters (god I love this filter thing) and I have some opinions but I will contribute more in about 19hours when I get back to my key and mouseboard.
I don't want to say something now because I want to tell you why and my nexus 4 is only good for reading, not writing.
Keep the text flowing so we get a good D1 and enough to lynch scum. He claims his phone is only good for writing, yet his punctuation doesn't that bad. This feels like it comes off as a stall tactic which is not helpful at all. Even if it might be difficult to type, he should have at least posted something beneficial. Perhaps when his "analysis" comes, my mind will change, but for now, he's close to the top of my list. Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 02:22 Spicydinosaur wrote: Voted for FloWcaster for no postings. Still waiting on a few others analysis to decide if im going to change it. Got a busy day but will hopefully be back in time for deadline.
I'm going to be changing my vote from flowmaster, he hasn't posted once so is going to be modkilled and replaced.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
Voted JarJarDinks for now because of previously stated reasons, shirokami, can you please post that analysis soon? It may give some more insight as to your alignment as well as influencing several people's votes.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 06 2013 03:10 nobodywonder wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 03:04 Targe wrote:On May 06 2013 03:00 nobodywonder wrote:@ spicydinosaur why didn't you vote for shirokami? why vote for flowcaster? On May 05 2013 11:50 Spicydinosaur wrote:shirokami is troubling me greatly. Aside from the lack of content in his posts, the only things the posts say are that he is postponing his analysis/discussion. On May 04 2013 21:25 shirokami wrote: Yo yo.
So about the LAL. It's good for the reason that there are zero reasons to lurk in a thread-only game.
Also I will only have my phone until tomorrow, so my posts today may lack some. On May 05 2013 06:44 shirokami wrote: Yo yo.
So I have been reading filters (god I love this filter thing) and I have some opinions but I will contribute more in about 19hours when I get back to my key and mouseboard.
I don't want to say something now because I want to tell you why and my nexus 4 is only good for reading, not writing.
Keep the text flowing so we get a good D1 and enough to lynch scum. He claims his phone is only good for writing, yet his punctuation doesn't that bad. This feels like it comes off as a stall tactic which is not helpful at all. Even if it might be difficult to type, he should have at least posted something beneficial. Perhaps when his "analysis" comes, my mind will change, but for now, he's close to the top of my list. On May 06 2013 02:22 Spicydinosaur wrote: Voted for FloWcaster for no postings. Still waiting on a few others analysis to decide if im going to change it. Got a busy day but will hopefully be back in time for deadline. I'm going to be changing my vote from flowmaster, he hasn't posted once so is going to be modkilled and replaced. why jarjar? explain.
I'm suspecting jarjar because he hasn't expressed opinions of other people, he has only explained his opinions on general things such as lynch policy, seems like he is trying to avoid lurking whilst appearing to contribute.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
@calgar, I wasn't calling for a lal policy, I was calling for a put pressure on lurkers with votes tactic.
Looks like jarjar's eating this lynch, I was hoping the voting would put some pressure on him to explain himself but he hasn't responded, annoying, if he turns out to be town that is a wasted day and a lynch, we'll be giving scum breathing room for another day.
Casey and Spicy, you really need to change your votes, flowcaster is pointless as he is about to be modkilled. Calgar, don't switch to flowcaster, that's a terrible idea because of his modkilling.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
I'm off to bed now, goodnight guys. vote well.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
ffs I wish I had seen that discussion and hadn't gone to bed, I only wanted to put pressure on jarjar but he posted after I went to sleep.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
Analysis time,
jrkirby:
Your posts are kind of meh, you have your 'Casey, shirokami, nobody' post which is ok, but I can't see how you put shirokami as scum, he's certainly not got the best filter but he isn't giving of major mafia vibes. The entire idea of this post seems to be that you think they are distancing themselves from each other yet you seem to ignore the possibility that they are actually three separate players, not a team.
All your other posts are very short, generally 1 or 2 liners, not good. You're coming off as one of the more scummy ones here.
nobodywonder:
Your filter is better, you post actively and aren't afraid to question people and put forward arguments, although you did get a little erratic at times.
Not much more to say, I have a null read on you at the moment.
VayneAuthority:
Well, you're getting a lot of heat for doing shit like not explaining reasons and going for a no lynch, which was just a bad idea. Your post history isn't the best but I think you're just some strange town that does things his own way, I I'll hold out until day 2 when you may give us some information.
Seriously, you need to speak up.
shiromaki:
man, you lurked way to much d1, when you came in you started some talking which is good but it still wasn't really close to what I was expecting to hear, still holding judgement but at the moment you just look like some scummy town.
Sugarfluff:
Your filter is really not very good, you really don't have many posts at all, the majority of them were concerning Vayne, which is a common topic and a relatively easy way of getting out of lurking without posting too much original content. Your entire post concerning Calgar and kirby relies on them being scumbuddies, what read do you have on them as individuals?
SpicyDinosaur:
You posted some bland stuff at the beginning about lurkers, like quite a few of us, then you focus on me because I vote Jarjar when trying to get him to post and that is about the basis of your argument. More stuff on vayne, blah blah, then we get to your replies to Hydra's post, Hydra to me had one of the best analysis posts yet and you slam it, saying it's off the rails completely, he put some excellent points into his analysis of you and I agree with him, you come off as scummy under analysis.
I'll do some more of you guys when I get the chance, I only have a short time in which I can write lengthier posts like this as I'm relatively busy.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 07 2013 03:52 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 03:34 nobodywonder wrote:@Hydra Hi, good I like your posting so far. Keep it up. What did you think about the outcome of the JarJar lynch? There may be a mafia on it perhaps so I'm very suscipious of casey. I also don't like the last minute random voting between jrkirby and spicydinosaur. that was weird. On May 07 2013 03:23 VayneAuthority wrote:On May 07 2013 00:10 AllHailHydraGod wrote:Hey! I'm highly suspicious of Spicydinosaur. His play seems calculated, coasting his vote on the guy who hasn't posted at all for 2/3 of Day 1 so he doesn't have to explain himself much when hopping on a wagon close to deadline. And the way his vote wound up on flowcaster is also "troubling". See his filter, in posts #3 and #4 he's asking questions which I would interpret as townie but then it's like he doesn't even care about them at all. His # 5 is this: On May 06 2013 02:22 Spicydinosaur wrote: Voted for FloWcaster for no postings. Still waiting on a few others analysis to decide if im going to change it. Got a busy day but will hopefully be back in time for deadline. What happened to his inquiries regarding nobodywonder's reason to vote Vayne.. or shirokami's lack of content and postponing analysis? Does he find them satisfying or scummy or what, he simply votes for pressuring the non-poster instead of pursuing his suspicions, letting people know where he stands.. they must've given him some impression but my hunch is he's not willing to share them because he wants to keep his options of jumping on their wagon open. His catch-up post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18508502]#6 does not give the impression as if he's interested to find things out. There's something about the way he starts his posts, look: On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: It seems at this point that flowcaster is going to be replaced so my vote for him is pointless and im going to change it. For the following reasons i am voting for Targe.
I had suspected shirokami because of his lack of posts, but once he got on he was talkative and gave his opinion.
First off he's like warming up to it by saying his vote on flowcaster is useless. This is either townie realizing he has been playing anti-town or apologetic, cheeky scum. I can't tell but judging by the way he says these are the reasons for voting for Targe .. i don't know, sounds like it's hard for him to do so and he's getting ready to write some fiction. I mean since scum talk in their QT about who's mislynch to push I feel like this is a coordinated move in that they decided that Targe should be Spicydinosaur's target but he seems like he's working hard to come up with reasons. But the next sentence is where I think he gave himself away: On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: I had suspected shirokami because of his lack of posts, but once he got on he was talkative and gave his opinion. As I've said he probably kept his options open to jump on one of the two he has questioned, actually, the only 2 people he had any sort of interactions with and even with these folks he didn't bother to comment on their replies to his questions. So here we see him choosing one of these options. The way the post is designed it's really rather sincere, like saying I was coasting so now I'm voting for one of the two guys I have a few sentences of content against, being extra careful because voting for anyone else would raise questions and scum/I don't like to explain myself. On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: I'll be on till vote time if anything needs help understanding. Understanding what? It's not like he left room for anything to misinterpret, he's scum and it's that simple. Others are concerned about switching the vote because JarJar doesn't seem scummy whereas he is concerned about people understanding his post. In fact I thought him and flowcaster where the scumteam and he used the inactivity of his scumbuddy to distance himself from him knowing well that if he fails to show up he'd get replaced, or that he could easily switch off him once he starts to post. That is not the case though. I'm town and you should sheep me on this one. I'll go over other people's filters shortly. My general impression is that jrkirby, nobodywonder, Targe and jampidampi are town. Also LAL means Lynch All Liars afaik. And lurkers aren't people who don't post at all but people who post little with little to no original content .. like Spicy. I will come out and say at the least incase I die tonight that I agree a lot with this analysis. Targe and spicydinosaur are 2 of my prime suspects, also wary of espi.casey. if you think you are going to die, you might as well give us the dirt on Targe. I don't see the point of delaying your analysis any further. what do you think of the other posters, any that take your attention? what do you think of hydra's case on dino? its worthless until any killing occur so if I die then so be it. I agree with his analysis on spicydinosaur for a couple of reasons. 1. he starts off the game by saying he was looking up ways, such as lurking, that would be considered anti-town. If that isnt suspicious I don't know what is. Onto more concrete evidence... 2. mafia tend to ask a lot of questions but don't have a lot of answers. asking why people are voting for others and what they think about others gives the illusion of productivity but in reality adds nothing. 3. Tons of bandwagoning and general agreeance with others. As soon as anybody pipes up about having suspicions about somebody else, he is right there to agree. I am also adding the flowcaster early vote to this. 4. Voting for targe late even though it has no impact on the vote. Shifts him away from the JarJar lynch and also separates scum into different places so as to cause confusion. If targe or spicy flips mafia, I would strongly consider the other being mafia as well. [/url]
Finally you spill!
I'd say that point 3 is a matter of my personality, not gameplay, I like to agree with people generally when it comes to a group, but you can read it how you want.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 07 2013 03:59 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2013 03:57 Targe wrote:On May 07 2013 03:52 VayneAuthority wrote:On May 07 2013 03:34 nobodywonder wrote:@Hydra Hi, good I like your posting so far. Keep it up. What did you think about the outcome of the JarJar lynch? There may be a mafia on it perhaps so I'm very suscipious of casey. I also don't like the last minute random voting between jrkirby and spicydinosaur. that was weird. On May 07 2013 03:23 VayneAuthority wrote:On May 07 2013 00:10 AllHailHydraGod wrote:Hey! I'm highly suspicious of Spicydinosaur. His play seems calculated, coasting his vote on the guy who hasn't posted at all for 2/3 of Day 1 so he doesn't have to explain himself much when hopping on a wagon close to deadline. And the way his vote wound up on flowcaster is also "troubling". See his filter, in posts #3 and #4 he's asking questions which I would interpret as townie but then it's like he doesn't even care about them at all. His # 5 is this: On May 06 2013 02:22 Spicydinosaur wrote: Voted for FloWcaster for no postings. Still waiting on a few others analysis to decide if im going to change it. Got a busy day but will hopefully be back in time for deadline. What happened to his inquiries regarding nobodywonder's reason to vote Vayne.. or shirokami's lack of content and postponing analysis? Does he find them satisfying or scummy or what, he simply votes for pressuring the non-poster instead of pursuing his suspicions, letting people know where he stands.. they must've given him some impression but my hunch is he's not willing to share them because he wants to keep his options of jumping on their wagon open. His catch-up post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18508502]#6 does not give the impression as if he's interested to find things out. There's something about the way he starts his posts, look: On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: It seems at this point that flowcaster is going to be replaced so my vote for him is pointless and im going to change it. For the following reasons i am voting for Targe.
I had suspected shirokami because of his lack of posts, but once he got on he was talkative and gave his opinion.
First off he's like warming up to it by saying his vote on flowcaster is useless. This is either townie realizing he has been playing anti-town or apologetic, cheeky scum. I can't tell but judging by the way he says these are the reasons for voting for Targe .. i don't know, sounds like it's hard for him to do so and he's getting ready to write some fiction. I mean since scum talk in their QT about who's mislynch to push I feel like this is a coordinated move in that they decided that Targe should be Spicydinosaur's target but he seems like he's working hard to come up with reasons. But the next sentence is where I think he gave himself away: On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: I had suspected shirokami because of his lack of posts, but once he got on he was talkative and gave his opinion. As I've said he probably kept his options open to jump on one of the two he has questioned, actually, the only 2 people he had any sort of interactions with and even with these folks he didn't bother to comment on their replies to his questions. So here we see him choosing one of these options. The way the post is designed it's really rather sincere, like saying I was coasting so now I'm voting for one of the two guys I have a few sentences of content against, being extra careful because voting for anyone else would raise questions and scum/I don't like to explain myself. On May 06 2013 10:21 Spicydinosaur wrote: I'll be on till vote time if anything needs help understanding. Understanding what? It's not like he left room for anything to misinterpret, he's scum and it's that simple. Others are concerned about switching the vote because JarJar doesn't seem scummy whereas he is concerned about people understanding his post. In fact I thought him and flowcaster where the scumteam and he used the inactivity of his scumbuddy to distance himself from him knowing well that if he fails to show up he'd get replaced, or that he could easily switch off him once he starts to post. That is not the case though. I'm town and you should sheep me on this one. I'll go over other people's filters shortly. My general impression is that jrkirby, nobodywonder, Targe and jampidampi are town. Also LAL means Lynch All Liars afaik. And lurkers aren't people who don't post at all but people who post little with little to no original content .. like Spicy. I will come out and say at the least incase I die tonight that I agree a lot with this analysis. Targe and spicydinosaur are 2 of my prime suspects, also wary of espi.casey. if you think you are going to die, you might as well give us the dirt on Targe. I don't see the point of delaying your analysis any further. what do you think of the other posters, any that take your attention? what do you think of hydra's case on dino? its worthless until any killing occur so if I die then so be it. I agree with his analysis on spicydinosaur for a couple of reasons. 1. he starts off the game by saying he was looking up ways, such as lurking, that would be considered anti-town. If that isnt suspicious I don't know what is. Onto more concrete evidence... 2. mafia tend to ask a lot of questions but don't have a lot of answers. asking why people are voting for others and what they think about others gives the illusion of productivity but in reality adds nothing. 3. Tons of bandwagoning and general agreeance with others. As soon as anybody pipes up about having suspicions about somebody else, he is right there to agree. I am also adding the flowcaster early vote to this. 4. Voting for targe late even though it has no impact on the vote. Shifts him away from the JarJar lynch and also separates scum into different places so as to cause confusion. If targe or spicy flips mafia, I would strongly consider the other being mafia as well. Finally you spill! I'd say that point 3 is a matter of my personality, not gameplay, I like to agree with people generally when it comes to a group, but you can read it how you want. that isnt analysis of you, its of spicy. As I stated I cant analyze you until the night killings occur. [/url]
lol okay, point still stands though.
|
United Kingdom14103 Posts
On May 07 2013 04:00 Spicydinosaur wrote:@AllHailHydraGod my initial disdain for shirokami was because of his lack of posting, then he posted this: Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 03:53 shirokami wrote: Im voting vayne for obvious scumslip: THERE ARE NO FRICKIN REASON TO NOT TELL YOU WHY SOMEONE IS SCUM IN A THREAD-ONLY GAME. It only looks bad and I think the reason in his vote against targe was because he has no reason. My logs are saying that targe is not scummy so thats it. I bet all my monnies that vayne flips scum.
Also about people voting JarJar, I like how he roasted jampidampi but they are both null for me right now, but they are definitely not scumbuddies, because only pro-scum even DARE do that kind of moves and this is not a pro-game. scum don't like attention.
Oh and people who sheep someone, Please say why. If you dont say why, thats useless and makes you look like a woolly babylonian.
@Calgar
Dude. you started the game with good discussion about LaL, but please contribute more, I want to see you post, because your filter is not fun.
@everyone
Feel free to ask anything. Here he gives his opinion on vayne and why. He also was focusing on people voting for jarjar. I really didnt get a read on him one way or the other on him with this post or with his subsequent votes so I then focused on others. As for jarjar, I initially like his posting as he called jampidampi out on the lynching lurker policy. The two of them had a good back and forth with jarjar defending his stance. After that exchange a lot of people began to pile on jarjar. I still feel targe is scummy as I reread his posts. The majority of them he acts very sheepishly. Show nested quote +On May 04 2013 15:25 Targe wrote: Lynching lurkers sounds like a good plan, what are we thinking for activity then? Obviously everyone has to post at least once a day but people could post more whilst dodging questions or important issues. Show nested quote +On May 04 2013 18:30 Targe wrote: I have to agree with jampidampi on Vayne, both of his posts are general comments, neither contribute to important discussion on day 1. He also seems to be waiting for others to give their opinion as he has stated on multiple occasions. Show nested quote +On May 05 2013 08:40 Targe wrote: I'm still waiting for what shirokami and flowcaster have to say, shirokami sounds like he's made some interesting analysis with all his reading.
Also, I don't think jampi is acting like scum, he's talking sense with how scum can abuse the lynch policy. Show nested quote +On May 05 2013 20:21 Targe wrote:
I'm interested in what Jarjar is going to do, I think the conclusion has been reached that we won't policy lynch? Correct me if I'm wrong. You're right about his posts only concerning policy lynches though, he hasn't put forward any arguments on people and seems to be commenting on general topics only, activity like that is indicative of scum or SK. This one paragraph here is all that targe gives on why he is voting jarjar. His reasoning can be directly applied to himself. His analysis of others is minimal and without much meat as seen below: Show nested quote +On May 05 2013 08:40 Targe wrote: Also, I don't think jampi is acting like scum, he's talking sense with how scum can abuse the lynch policy. Show nested quote +On May 05 2013 20:21 Targe wrote: Vayne's free to vote for me as no one isn't suspect on D1, he obviously has some logic behind his post but he hasn't shared it just yet. Then after all is said and done, Targe writes this: Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 07:05 Targe wrote: Looks like jarjar's eating this lynch, I was hoping the voting would put some pressure on him to explain himself but he hasn't responded, annoying, if he turns out to be town that is a wasted day and a lynch, we'll be giving scum breathing room for another day. This sounds like he knows jarjar is town and is almost expressing sorrow before the vote is in to look like he made a mistake in the vote and that he is remorseful. The bolded part simply overstates the obvious and serves nothing but fluff. Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 15:25 Targe wrote: ffs I wish I had seen that discussion and hadn't gone to bed, I only wanted to put pressure on jarjar but he posted after I went to sleep. Here again he expresses remorse. He could have changed his vote when he saw the piling on of jarjar, yet he chose to keep it on him. These last two paragraphs just sound incredibly scummy to me combined with the lack of any real opinions of the other players.
I didn't think Jarjar was incredibly scummy no, but he was definitely not a clear townie, the aim of my vote was to put pressure on him and when I went to bed there were only 2 votes on him, one of them being me, had I been up I would have of course changed my vote because I would have both seen his post and seen that he was being BW'ed.
I've got to do some work now, be back in an hour or so.
|
|
|
|