I will not be modkillllll....
Mattchew the sexy has been modkilled!
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
I will not be modkillllll.... Mattchew the sexy has been modkilled! | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Release comes in to the thread with this post and edit On November 01 2012 09:00 Release wrote: to everyone: Are we asking Millers or Masons to claim? prplhz (the origin of the idea) said millers and now kushmasta has asked for masons to claim (although he does avoid saying mason). I have to say already that kshmasta is looking scummy. Since i don't see the advantage of a miller claim, i'd like to know why a miller should claim (from both prplhz and hope in particular). I'd also like to hear from kushmasta why you avoided saying mason. On November 01 2012 09:01 Release wrote: EBWOP: those are three separate ideas, although kushmasta is looking scummy for both trying to change who should claim and being deceitful about it. He accuses kushmasta of... honestly i dont know... especially after he asks about the discussion being about masons or millers. Kush misread the thread / roles being discussed and thought millers = masons... calling him scum for this is the biggest stretch i have seen in a while. there is no way anyone with any level of reading comprehension would draw these conclusions from kush's posting and reading the thread around it release is trying to look like he is scum hunting by skewing kush's words from the thread. Zealos is probably scum too. He immediately jumps into the thread (after promising to be active this game) with 2 posts that are setup talk and literally basically say nothing. On November 01 2012 09:06 Zealos wrote: Show nested quote + On November 01 2012 09:00 Release wrote: to everyone: Are we asking Millers or Masons to claim? prplhz (the origin of the idea) said millers and now kushmasta has asked for masons to claim (although he does avoid saying mason). I don't like the idea of masons claiming at all? o.O On November 01 2012 09:09 Zealos wrote: Show nested quote + On November 01 2012 09:07 thrawn2112 wrote: release, you are looking scummy. what was kush "deceitful" about? your accusation against him is spin-city thinking prplhz meant mason when he said miller is what kush did, i even did it to for a while... i don't see how it even comes close to being deceitful I highly doubt a mafia would get so aggressive right off the bat imo. Just seems like dumb reasoning, is all. The thing is though, he jumps on the fact that masons are being talked about. Other than Kush mis-reading the thread there has been no talks of masons claiming. He then follows this with a really soft defense of release saying that mafia wouldnt be that aggressive. A. I would hardly call release's posting aggressive, trying to paint it as aggressive is deceptive and super scummy. B. Scum can be aggressive and passive all the time, but he is trying to paint aggressiveness as townie, while giving that trait to release ##vote Release | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 01 2012 10:40 Acrofales wrote: Zealos is being Zealos. I have nothing much to say about him yet. can you expand and explain this to me like im 5 | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 01 2012 10:59 Acrofales wrote: Show nested quote + On November 01 2012 10:49 Hopeless1der wrote: On November 01 2012 10:40 Acrofales wrote: Hi Mattchew. On the one hand I agree with you, although for different reasons. However, I have seen this kind of finger pointing go terribly wrong too often. It is entirely possible Release is a newbienoob (which I kinda suspect given that I have no clue who he is) and is simply jumping on the first bad play of the game, in what I will happily call the second bad play of the game. My main problem with Release is this post: On November 01 2012 10:09 Release wrote: On November 01 2012 09:05 kushm4sta wrote: On November 01 2012 09:01 Release wrote: EBWOP: those are three separate ideas, although kushmasta is looking scummy for both trying to change who should claim and being deceitful about it. I'm not being deceitful about it, I just got their names mixed up. I think they should probably both claim actually. @release Are you suggesting that I'm trying to trick power roles like vig, dt, etc into mass claiming? Are millers' true alignment revealed upon death? well, you were assigning Mason traits to the miller, which led to the confusion that it did between who should claim. Also, you didn't mention mason but the "town who can talk to each other." You avoided saying mason. Mason is clear. "town who can talk to each other" could be mason, but could be miller if someone assumed you were talking about who YOU thought "could talk to each other." Mafia is a game in which posts can't be editted. People tend to check their posts for any dubious or tentative information. I highly doubt that you "mixed up" their names because things like that tend to get checked, which leads me to believe you said such things on purpose. I wasn't talking about the mass claim. That was rather obvious. This is pathetic and reaks of scum. While I was willing to write off his first post as one derp of accusing another derp, this one just seems malevolent. He is trying to paint a scum reason for making a mistake and dreaming up wild unprovable theories in the process. This is not a town move. It's an easy way for scum to (try to) get a mislynch bandwagon going. Nevertheless, it's a terrible scumplay. Holding off on my vote to see where this goes. Zealos is being Zealos. I have nothing much to say about him yet. Acro, I just want to confirm that you think Kush derped (i.e. is probably town) and that Release might have derped but it was very scummy and you'd lean towards him being scum. Is that correct? That is correct. @Release: I could vote for you, but there's no point yet. Why the rush with over 40 hours left in D1? As I said at the top of that post: I don't like your followup and can easily read a scum motive into it. However, it's D1 and tunneling on one player is not the way I like to play D1 (it leads to a mislynch 90% of the time). yeah im voting because of the opposite, often on day 1 town loses focus and direction for its lynch and ends up in a last minute scramble. I trust my early reads pretty heavily so it will take a lot to move my vote right now | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
a mafia is the key word(s) that defines it as a general read | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Yeah I wanna hear a lot more... Acro and muso your partners need to claim there is too much question involved in what seems to be an attempt at a "setup confirmed" lynch plan | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On November 02 2012 09:23 kushm4sta wrote: I think it is the natural tendency of mafia to accuse people on things that they themselves are guilty of. As mafia you are hyper aware of your own mistakes and that gives the mind a convenient go to for what to look for in other people. Mattchew hypothetically accuses release of something that he is actually also guilty of! Release jumps on me for a stupid reason. Mattchew jumps on Realease for a stupid reason. Show nested quote + He accuses kushmasta of... honestly i dont know... especially after he asks about the discussion being about masons or millers. Kush misread the thread / roles being discussed and thought millers = masons... calling him scum for this is the biggest stretch i have seen in a while. there is no way anyone with any level of reading comprehension would draw these conclusions from kush's posting and reading the thread around it release is trying to look like he is scum hunting by skewing kush's words from the thread. So essentially you are accusing him because of bad "reading comprehension." That is kind of the same thing he accuses me of though. Then this: Show nested quote + On November 01 2012 11:07 Mattchew wrote: On November 01 2012 10:59 Acrofales wrote: On November 01 2012 10:49 Hopeless1der wrote: On November 01 2012 10:40 Acrofales wrote: Hi Mattchew. On the one hand I agree with you, although for different reasons. However, I have seen this kind of finger pointing go terribly wrong too often. It is entirely possible Release is a newbienoob (which I kinda suspect given that I have no clue who he is) and is simply jumping on the first bad play of the game, in what I will happily call the second bad play of the game. My main problem with Release is this post: On November 01 2012 10:09 Release wrote: On November 01 2012 09:05 kushm4sta wrote: On November 01 2012 09:01 Release wrote: EBWOP: those are three separate ideas, although kushmasta is looking scummy for both trying to change who should claim and being deceitful about it. I'm not being deceitful about it, I just got their names mixed up. I think they should probably both claim actually. @release Are you suggesting that I'm trying to trick power roles like vig, dt, etc into mass claiming? Are millers' true alignment revealed upon death? well, you were assigning Mason traits to the miller, which led to the confusion that it did between who should claim. Also, you didn't mention mason but the "town who can talk to each other." You avoided saying mason. Mason is clear. "town who can talk to each other" could be mason, but could be miller if someone assumed you were talking about who YOU thought "could talk to each other." Mafia is a game in which posts can't be editted. People tend to check their posts for any dubious or tentative information. I highly doubt that you "mixed up" their names because things like that tend to get checked, which leads me to believe you said such things on purpose. I wasn't talking about the mass claim. That was rather obvious. This is pathetic and reaks of scum. While I was willing to write off his first post as one derp of accusing another derp, this one just seems malevolent. He is trying to paint a scum reason for making a mistake and dreaming up wild unprovable theories in the process. This is not a town move. It's an easy way for scum to (try to) get a mislynch bandwagon going. Nevertheless, it's a terrible scumplay. Holding off on my vote to see where this goes. Zealos is being Zealos. I have nothing much to say about him yet. Acro, I just want to confirm that you think Kush derped (i.e. is probably town) and that Release might have derped but it was very scummy and you'd lean towards him being scum. Is that correct? That is correct. @Release: I could vote for you, but there's no point yet. Why the rush with over 40 hours left in D1? As I said at the top of that post: I don't like your followup and can easily read a scum motive into it. However, it's D1 and tunneling on one player is not the way I like to play D1 (it leads to a mislynch 90% of the time). yeah im voting because of the opposite, often on day 1 town loses focus and direction for its lynch and ends up in a last minute scramble. I trust my early reads pretty heavily so it will take a lot to move my vote right now Are your early reads right a lot? Most people haven't even talked yet at this point, but you overblow this release case to the point where you already know who you want to lynch. I think Mattchew was being hypocritical and overzealous in his attack on Release. fos mattchew Someone with a meta read, is Mattchew usually this decisive for weak reasons? are you thick? I think release is scum because he skewed what you said and jumped on the opportunity to do so to call you scum... His reasoning is so flawed... I also believe I said that there was no conceivable way his reading comp was that bad, meaning I believe he did this intentionally | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
##vote muso | ||
| ||
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Weekly #48
Wayne vs GeraldLIVE!
Krystianer vs TBD
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Sea 17603 Dota 2firebathero 4926 Calm 4584 Bisu 2064 Pusan 710 EffOrt 413 BeSt 339 Soulkey 294 ggaemo 251 Light 243 [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH177 StarCraft: Brood War• 3DClanTV 56 • StrangeGG 55 • Kozan • Poblha • Migwel • Laughngamez YouTube • LaughNgamez Trovo • IndyKCrew • Gussbus • intothetv • aXEnki Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Gypsy vs Bonyth
Mihu vs XiaoShuai
The PiG Daily
Clem vs Rogue
Reynor vs TBD
Dark vs ReBellioN
herO vs TBD
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
GSL Code S
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
[ Show More ] ESL Pro Tour
Online Event
ESL Pro Tour
Hatchery Cup
BSL
ESL Pro Tour
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|