|
Hey everyone,
Using some code I had lying around, I went through the D Ranks Individual Tournaments and D Ranks Team Leagues, and D Ranks King of the Hill, and created a database with proper ELO rankings. I plan on doing quite a lot more but here's a preview, as it were, of what is to come :D
Please note: There are a few players who had two accounts and I didn't know about them, so the rankings aren't perfectly accurate. Ones I know about are Arya[wOk] being sgs.fantasy and deathterranall, and Slugger[wOk] being sGs.Slugger. However, because of the way it's currently coded, I can't easily go back and change the results, so this will have to do for now. Warning: this is a large image.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
No surprises in the top players... It'd be interesting to see what their win rates would be if you didn't include games against each other... And by interesting, I mean we all know what it'll look like. I'd just like to actually see it.
|
this is so cool, thanks for this 
|
sitting proudly at 116th
|
Im 84th and IU is #23 but that slute cant beat me 1on1 if his life dependent on it. I got the replays we played best out of 10 a few months ago and I won 9 out of 10. I can beat that slute as zerg, toss or terran. Worst BW player in history of BW. Legit D level player though...forever D. I dont know about some of the other guys on top of that list though. Also I know this is some harsh talk, ban worthy but this happens to be a friend of mine and he is used to me shitting on his BW skills.
|
woah.. this is cool ! 
I hope I can be on this list somewhere in near future
|
Well done!
I've always wanted to see a foreigner ELO Ranks chart.
|
|
|
Courage with 3 top 10 players! Shame Nagisama is so relatively low, I figured he would be higher.
|
Canada4481 Posts
nice job, this looks really neat! not too surprised at my own personal ranking.
|
lol where did u get all those players from :O?
looks good !
|
sitting cosily on #139 .... not happy with that got to do something .
Thanks for this .
|
On September 15 2012 00:02 Eywa- wrote:
No surprises in the top players... It'd be interesting to see what their win rates would be if you didn't include games against each other... And by interesting, I mean we all know what it'll look like. I'd just like to actually see it.
What would be the point of showing a win rate like that?
|
10387 Posts
O_O wow that's a lot of players
|
Thats pretty cool, hopefully gonna make it once I'm able to play again.
|
You Included everyone who ever set foot in D ranks league which is actually pretty cool. Sitting proudly with my off race at 161.
|
|
|
Canada8036 Posts
On September 15 2012 00:02 Eywa- wrote:
No surprises in the top players... It'd be interesting to see what their win rates would be if you didn't include games against each other... And by interesting, I mean we all know what it'll look like. I'd just like to actually see it.
Obviously the top players don't lose (or lose rarely) versus non-top players. Otherwise they wouldn't be in the top... This is the entire point of ELO rofl.
|
I think it's a bit misleading. The players who have played a lot are overly favored/disfavored. There's also a few WO games in there. With such a low amount of games, looking at winrates seems more meaningful.
|
this is really awesome and where do you take all these players O.O i mean thats alot...
...but black on grey :/ and at "points" you dont need so many digits/numbers behind the comma, would make it easier to read...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/vpVFs.png)
