• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:23
CEST 10:23
KST 17:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension1Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles7[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China11
StarCraft 2
General
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone [Guide] MyStarcraft BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 494 users

Unit Collision

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
NubbleST
Profile Joined July 2011
United States86 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-04 01:15:37
July 04 2012 01:14 GMT
#1
I brought this up in the Modified Movement thread, but did a quick search on "unit collision" and actually found nothing (which is surprising; I thought this was a pretty big topic a while back. I guess I was wrong), so I decided to create a new thread dedicated to the idea to increase exposure (since everyone will obvious see a random post on page 17 of the MM thread about unit collision).

Please note that this is NOT a game change suggestion. I'm throwing out a hypothesis as to why SC2 falls back to deathball vs. deathball engagements so often and a possible solution based on the hypothesized cause. Now I am offering the idea to the community for feedback and criticism. Incidentally, if any mapmakers know how to make a map with increased unit collision (as a mapmaker, how much unit collision is increased is up to your discretion) for testing, I'd be much obliged (the map editor confuses me). If anyone were to do this though, I'd request it be done on Shakuras, Cloud Kingdom, and TDA. The reasoning behind these 3 is that Shakuras contains a lot of chokes and is pretty conducive to split map scenarios. TDA is a large, open map that still has various exploitable terrain advantages (think terrain at the watchtowers and the highground center). Cloud Kingdom is kind of a middleman; plus, I just like the map features personally and think it could lead to some interesting army movement. This is entirely voluntary, and if anyone out doesn't want to make the maps, but knows of a way to change unit collision and would be willing to share, I could work on them myself (although I have 0 mapmaking experience).

From the Modified Movement thread (spoilered because giant wall of text):
+ Show Spoiler +
What I think (and has been brought up a few times on TL to no avail) would suit the OP's purposes better is an increase in unit collision size. This naturally causes units to spread out a bit more and can possibly make the deathball's radius so large that there's no longer any incentive to do so, except in very specific circumstances. My two cents? The breaking up of deathballs is NOT the primary cause for smaller skirmishes all over the map (though it is a key component); area control is.

Think about the state of ZvT a few months ago (muta ling bling vs marine medi tank). I think there was even a poll on TL about the most dynamic and interesting match up and, if I remember correctly, ZvT was awarded the title. Most people attributed this to the area control that came with tanks. Even if Zerg had a superior army, a bad engagement angle could mean his superior army gets completely crushed by marine tank fire. Thus, the Z had to be active in scouting and proficient in maneuvering his army around so that he can get the right angle to engage. This also had the effect of making run-bys and muta harassment more viable (whether it's because attacking into the seige line would be suicide, or to bait the Terran into moving out of position and opening a window in an otherwise impenetrable defense). From the T side, the Terran had to be methodic and careful about pushing out of the map, and he had to be aware of the both player's army movements and position. This lead to some very dynamic army movements and made positioning just as important as army composition.
+ Show Spoiler +
I, personally, would say that too many match ups in SC2 are too focused solely on army composition and don't take any consideration into terrain and positioning save for how big the map is and how wide a choke is.

All of this is due to the area control seige tanks gave. (This analogy also applies somewhat to TvT, but since both players get seige tanks it can sometimes turn into trench warfare essentially. Also, I don't play T so I have no clue about TvT other than it's heavily position based).

Going back to unit collision, let's say we have 11 min roach max PvZ Cloud Kingdom. Let's say hypothetically with the current unit collision, you have 60 roaches, 40 of which can fire at once (Ignore forcefields for this simplified example. Let's assume stalkers are just as cost effective per unit as roaches). What if roach unit collision was such that, instead of 40, you could only get 30 roaches firing at once? How about 20? If only 20 of your roaches can be attacking at that location at any given time, there would be much more incentive to split your army and attack multiple locations at once. This also applies to the Protoss, in that he will also be limited by an increase in his unit collision size and have the incentive to spread his army out to defend multiple locations at once.

What's stopping this from happening NOW is that, if I split my roaches into 30 and 30, the smaller unit collision size means that I basically have half my army against his entire army (it's like forcefielding yourself in half for him!). After he stomps half my roaches, he just has to march over and massacre the other half and I won't have enough time to do any real damage. If unit collision sizes were larger, however, he has less army fighting my 30 roaches (say, 60% or 70% of his army can attack at any given time), meaning not only do my roaches do more damage , it also takes longer for the protoss to kill the first 30 roaches. (Think 1 roach vs 1 marine 10x vs. 1 roach vs 10 marines 1x) This makes multi-pronged attacks more powerful and encourages more army movement, flanks, etc. This example can be extended to engagements in the middle of the map as well.

Let's say we find an increased unit collision size and change units/maps where everything balances. How might a mid-game ZvP engagement play out? Ideally, we might have the Z (with larger numbers of cheaper, lower range units) setting up a flank on the protoss. The protoss, having good map awareness, sees the flank coming before it's too late, and decides to warp in reinforcements BEHIND the group of Zerg units intended to flank; the Protoss is essentially flanking a flank. Now what determines who comes out of this engagement victorious is not only army composition and macro, but also maneuvering, preparation, and planning. Did the Zerg player anticipate the possibility of his flank being countered and leave an escape path? Did he foresee this, and decided pre-emptively to rally his reinforcements to a Protoss expansion, knowing that the Protoss would either have to warp in to save his mining probes or risk getting his army crushed by a flank? Did the Protoss pick an avenue of attack that will allow him to clean up the flank from a defensive position, or did the Zerg manage to bait the Protoss out of position and too far to clean up in time? There are so many extra positional and tactical factors that could go into an engagement like this that aren't present in the typical deathball vs deathball microfest/shitstorm (think typical PvT deathballs) that really should be in an RTS game like SC2 that are simply missing.

NOTE: I realize scenarios like the one I explained above do happen. However, I am hypothesizing that an increase in unit collision size (and a corresponding decrease in dps per area) will ENCOURAGE positional play and, instead of having the odd game where such factors become a major factor in an engagement, EVERY ENGAGEMENT will be planned out with such factors in mind. This also has an extra affect of adding depth to the game and giving more chance for the best players to separate themselves from the good players.
xxjondxx
Profile Joined February 2010
United States89 Posts
July 04 2012 01:17 GMT
#2
Didn't Martijn do a video or something on this for some day9 thing. It might have been for the launch party for sc2.
NubbleST
Profile Joined July 2011
United States86 Posts
July 04 2012 01:23 GMT
#3
If someone somewhere else covered this already, please share I did a quick search on unit collision in TL and couldn't find anything substantial.
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
July 04 2012 01:31 GMT
#4
If we are talking about how the collision mechanics works in SC2. I might throw in my 2 piece of minerals. Well in short, there is no collision in SC2. Unlike the classic RTSs, when you order units to move into one specific area and they just coincide to meet on the way toward the destination, they won`t try to push each other or `collide` simply because the engine is so clean that the units just end up sticking among themselves.

Now is that method considered 'good'? The answer is completely debatable.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
pzea469
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1520 Posts
July 04 2012 01:48 GMT
#5
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=198840

Yeah this was discussed and maps were made. I think it's still active, not sure. I tried it a while ago and I liked it because it was a great alternative compared to deathballs. I would have accepted anything that removed them. It also seemed to add a bit more micro since you could control individual units better and not instantly die to a tightly packed force. The problem is that it's very artificial. This unlike mm would change gameplay a lot because you simply can't ball up your army. I'm not against change though, just stating this. BW, which is what many people compare SC2 army movements to, didn't have this. That doesn't make it a bad thing but BW solved things differently. SC2 balls up so much because it forces you to ball up every time you move, and because there is no real scary splash. MM solves the first problem. AoE could then be buffed. I don't know how I feel about larger unit radius now that mm solved the game forcing me to ball up all the time. I'm not really against this, but it would remove the option to ball up, which would also remove the possibility of a killer AoE spell wiping out a packed army, which was exciting to watch in BW.

My opinion is that it's too artificial. It's really a constraint. But I would vastly prefer it compared to default SC2. AoE obviously would have to be increased. With MM, AoE SHOULD be increased in order to scare people from just balling up the whole time. With this, it would HAVE to be increased in order to be able to hit anything, as well as increasing melee damage since less units can hit the same target. It would also make it easier to trap units and block them(probably a good thing).

Of course it all depends on how much unit collision is increased by. I wouldn't mind a small increase, smaller than it was when I tried the custom map. The reason I wouldn't mind this is because SC2 is 3d where as BW was 2d. In BW seeing individual units was very clear. SC2 doesn't make it as clear because it's 3d, with fancy graphics. A small amount of distance between units could help distinguish units better, making the game easier to spectate. That's the main thing I'd like out of a small increase to unit radius.
Kill the Deathball
xxjondxx
Profile Joined February 2010
United States89 Posts
July 04 2012 01:50 GMT
#6
http://blip.tv/day9tv/sc2-countdown-party-part-8-glhf-tv-pathfinding-3988453 thats the video i was thinking of before.
TheGGparadox
Profile Joined February 2012
United States37 Posts
July 04 2012 02:11 GMT
#7
Watching that day9 video right now. Im looking into how this works, but it sounds very good in theory.
Martijn
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands1219 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-17 18:37:13
August 17 2012 18:35 GMT
#8
Sorry to necro the thread, but I found this while looking through IEM feedback.

Yeah I made the video for the release party, but because it was intended for a general crowd, I was afraid to go too in depth.

I'm a game and media tech master student, so yeah we've covered a lot of approaches to handle crowds. Funny enough that I'll be doing an internship at Incontrol Simulation Solutions, the name made ME smirk in any case. Anyway, they create software to simulate crowd behavior, evacuation models, crowd density analysis etcetc. If there's ever any initiative to implement more sophisticated crowd behavior/collision prevention, I'd be quite willing to lend a hand.
http://www.glhf.tv fighting! Former WesternWolves & LowLandLions operations manager.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 230
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 1056
PianO 539
Leta 112
BeSt 96
Shine 35
Stork 32
Noble 21
Bale 13
Dota 2
monkeys_forever522
ODPixel415
XcaliburYe364
League of Legends
JimRising 609
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K815
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King184
Westballz21
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor155
Other Games
summit1g9757
ceh9554
Fuzer 233
SortOf130
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick4908
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH368
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2166
League of Legends
• HappyZerGling109
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
2h 37m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
WardiTV European League
1d 7h
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
1d 15h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Epic.LAN
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.