• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:51
CEST 10:51
KST 17:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: SoulKey's 5-Peat Challenge [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence BW General Discussion ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1533 users

Unit Collision

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
NubbleST
Profile Joined July 2011
United States86 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-04 01:15:37
July 04 2012 01:14 GMT
#1
I brought this up in the Modified Movement thread, but did a quick search on "unit collision" and actually found nothing (which is surprising; I thought this was a pretty big topic a while back. I guess I was wrong), so I decided to create a new thread dedicated to the idea to increase exposure (since everyone will obvious see a random post on page 17 of the MM thread about unit collision).

Please note that this is NOT a game change suggestion. I'm throwing out a hypothesis as to why SC2 falls back to deathball vs. deathball engagements so often and a possible solution based on the hypothesized cause. Now I am offering the idea to the community for feedback and criticism. Incidentally, if any mapmakers know how to make a map with increased unit collision (as a mapmaker, how much unit collision is increased is up to your discretion) for testing, I'd be much obliged (the map editor confuses me). If anyone were to do this though, I'd request it be done on Shakuras, Cloud Kingdom, and TDA. The reasoning behind these 3 is that Shakuras contains a lot of chokes and is pretty conducive to split map scenarios. TDA is a large, open map that still has various exploitable terrain advantages (think terrain at the watchtowers and the highground center). Cloud Kingdom is kind of a middleman; plus, I just like the map features personally and think it could lead to some interesting army movement. This is entirely voluntary, and if anyone out doesn't want to make the maps, but knows of a way to change unit collision and would be willing to share, I could work on them myself (although I have 0 mapmaking experience).

From the Modified Movement thread (spoilered because giant wall of text):
+ Show Spoiler +
What I think (and has been brought up a few times on TL to no avail) would suit the OP's purposes better is an increase in unit collision size. This naturally causes units to spread out a bit more and can possibly make the deathball's radius so large that there's no longer any incentive to do so, except in very specific circumstances. My two cents? The breaking up of deathballs is NOT the primary cause for smaller skirmishes all over the map (though it is a key component); area control is.

Think about the state of ZvT a few months ago (muta ling bling vs marine medi tank). I think there was even a poll on TL about the most dynamic and interesting match up and, if I remember correctly, ZvT was awarded the title. Most people attributed this to the area control that came with tanks. Even if Zerg had a superior army, a bad engagement angle could mean his superior army gets completely crushed by marine tank fire. Thus, the Z had to be active in scouting and proficient in maneuvering his army around so that he can get the right angle to engage. This also had the effect of making run-bys and muta harassment more viable (whether it's because attacking into the seige line would be suicide, or to bait the Terran into moving out of position and opening a window in an otherwise impenetrable defense). From the T side, the Terran had to be methodic and careful about pushing out of the map, and he had to be aware of the both player's army movements and position. This lead to some very dynamic army movements and made positioning just as important as army composition.
+ Show Spoiler +
I, personally, would say that too many match ups in SC2 are too focused solely on army composition and don't take any consideration into terrain and positioning save for how big the map is and how wide a choke is.

All of this is due to the area control seige tanks gave. (This analogy also applies somewhat to TvT, but since both players get seige tanks it can sometimes turn into trench warfare essentially. Also, I don't play T so I have no clue about TvT other than it's heavily position based).

Going back to unit collision, let's say we have 11 min roach max PvZ Cloud Kingdom. Let's say hypothetically with the current unit collision, you have 60 roaches, 40 of which can fire at once (Ignore forcefields for this simplified example. Let's assume stalkers are just as cost effective per unit as roaches). What if roach unit collision was such that, instead of 40, you could only get 30 roaches firing at once? How about 20? If only 20 of your roaches can be attacking at that location at any given time, there would be much more incentive to split your army and attack multiple locations at once. This also applies to the Protoss, in that he will also be limited by an increase in his unit collision size and have the incentive to spread his army out to defend multiple locations at once.

What's stopping this from happening NOW is that, if I split my roaches into 30 and 30, the smaller unit collision size means that I basically have half my army against his entire army (it's like forcefielding yourself in half for him!). After he stomps half my roaches, he just has to march over and massacre the other half and I won't have enough time to do any real damage. If unit collision sizes were larger, however, he has less army fighting my 30 roaches (say, 60% or 70% of his army can attack at any given time), meaning not only do my roaches do more damage , it also takes longer for the protoss to kill the first 30 roaches. (Think 1 roach vs 1 marine 10x vs. 1 roach vs 10 marines 1x) This makes multi-pronged attacks more powerful and encourages more army movement, flanks, etc. This example can be extended to engagements in the middle of the map as well.

Let's say we find an increased unit collision size and change units/maps where everything balances. How might a mid-game ZvP engagement play out? Ideally, we might have the Z (with larger numbers of cheaper, lower range units) setting up a flank on the protoss. The protoss, having good map awareness, sees the flank coming before it's too late, and decides to warp in reinforcements BEHIND the group of Zerg units intended to flank; the Protoss is essentially flanking a flank. Now what determines who comes out of this engagement victorious is not only army composition and macro, but also maneuvering, preparation, and planning. Did the Zerg player anticipate the possibility of his flank being countered and leave an escape path? Did he foresee this, and decided pre-emptively to rally his reinforcements to a Protoss expansion, knowing that the Protoss would either have to warp in to save his mining probes or risk getting his army crushed by a flank? Did the Protoss pick an avenue of attack that will allow him to clean up the flank from a defensive position, or did the Zerg manage to bait the Protoss out of position and too far to clean up in time? There are so many extra positional and tactical factors that could go into an engagement like this that aren't present in the typical deathball vs deathball microfest/shitstorm (think typical PvT deathballs) that really should be in an RTS game like SC2 that are simply missing.

NOTE: I realize scenarios like the one I explained above do happen. However, I am hypothesizing that an increase in unit collision size (and a corresponding decrease in dps per area) will ENCOURAGE positional play and, instead of having the odd game where such factors become a major factor in an engagement, EVERY ENGAGEMENT will be planned out with such factors in mind. This also has an extra affect of adding depth to the game and giving more chance for the best players to separate themselves from the good players.
xxjondxx
Profile Joined February 2010
United States89 Posts
July 04 2012 01:17 GMT
#2
Didn't Martijn do a video or something on this for some day9 thing. It might have been for the launch party for sc2.
NubbleST
Profile Joined July 2011
United States86 Posts
July 04 2012 01:23 GMT
#3
If someone somewhere else covered this already, please share I did a quick search on unit collision in TL and couldn't find anything substantial.
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
July 04 2012 01:31 GMT
#4
If we are talking about how the collision mechanics works in SC2. I might throw in my 2 piece of minerals. Well in short, there is no collision in SC2. Unlike the classic RTSs, when you order units to move into one specific area and they just coincide to meet on the way toward the destination, they won`t try to push each other or `collide` simply because the engine is so clean that the units just end up sticking among themselves.

Now is that method considered 'good'? The answer is completely debatable.
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
pzea469
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States1520 Posts
July 04 2012 01:48 GMT
#5
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=198840

Yeah this was discussed and maps were made. I think it's still active, not sure. I tried it a while ago and I liked it because it was a great alternative compared to deathballs. I would have accepted anything that removed them. It also seemed to add a bit more micro since you could control individual units better and not instantly die to a tightly packed force. The problem is that it's very artificial. This unlike mm would change gameplay a lot because you simply can't ball up your army. I'm not against change though, just stating this. BW, which is what many people compare SC2 army movements to, didn't have this. That doesn't make it a bad thing but BW solved things differently. SC2 balls up so much because it forces you to ball up every time you move, and because there is no real scary splash. MM solves the first problem. AoE could then be buffed. I don't know how I feel about larger unit radius now that mm solved the game forcing me to ball up all the time. I'm not really against this, but it would remove the option to ball up, which would also remove the possibility of a killer AoE spell wiping out a packed army, which was exciting to watch in BW.

My opinion is that it's too artificial. It's really a constraint. But I would vastly prefer it compared to default SC2. AoE obviously would have to be increased. With MM, AoE SHOULD be increased in order to scare people from just balling up the whole time. With this, it would HAVE to be increased in order to be able to hit anything, as well as increasing melee damage since less units can hit the same target. It would also make it easier to trap units and block them(probably a good thing).

Of course it all depends on how much unit collision is increased by. I wouldn't mind a small increase, smaller than it was when I tried the custom map. The reason I wouldn't mind this is because SC2 is 3d where as BW was 2d. In BW seeing individual units was very clear. SC2 doesn't make it as clear because it's 3d, with fancy graphics. A small amount of distance between units could help distinguish units better, making the game easier to spectate. That's the main thing I'd like out of a small increase to unit radius.
Kill the Deathball
xxjondxx
Profile Joined February 2010
United States89 Posts
July 04 2012 01:50 GMT
#6
http://blip.tv/day9tv/sc2-countdown-party-part-8-glhf-tv-pathfinding-3988453 thats the video i was thinking of before.
TheGGparadox
Profile Joined February 2012
United States37 Posts
July 04 2012 02:11 GMT
#7
Watching that day9 video right now. Im looking into how this works, but it sounds very good in theory.
Martijn
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands1219 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-17 18:37:13
August 17 2012 18:35 GMT
#8
Sorry to necro the thread, but I found this while looking through IEM feedback.

Yeah I made the video for the release party, but because it was intended for a general crowd, I was afraid to go too in depth.

I'm a game and media tech master student, so yeah we've covered a lot of approaches to handle crowds. Funny enough that I'll be doing an internship at Incontrol Simulation Solutions, the name made ME smirk in any case. Anyway, they create software to simulate crowd behavior, evacuation models, crowd density analysis etcetc. If there's ever any initiative to implement more sophisticated crowd behavior/collision prevention, I'd be quite willing to lend a hand.
http://www.glhf.tv fighting! Former WesternWolves & LowLandLions operations manager.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 9m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 128
ProTech71
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 1119
actioN 1049
PianO 191
Leta 149
soO 73
Flash 68
Dewaltoss 62
ggaemo 62
Sharp 61
Nal_rA 55
[ Show more ]
sorry 39
Noble 28
ZerO 21
NaDa 17
Sacsri 11
Dota 2
XcaliburYe1065
BananaSlamJamma308
NeuroSwarm114
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1094
Stewie2K542
shoxiejesuss387
allub244
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King41
Other Games
ceh9546
XaKoH 164
Pyrionflax149
SortOf104
Trikslyr27
RotterdaM7
ZerO(Twitch)2
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick379
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt1128
• Jankos628
Upcoming Events
LiuLi Cup
2h 9m
OSC
10h 9m
RSL Revival
1d 1h
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
1d 4h
RSL Revival
2 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.