EPTTL Mafia LV
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On May 26 2012 10:53 VisceraEyes wrote: You owe some dudes some hat-related ingestion before you play any more here sir. X( I have never been wrong in hat-eating circumstances, and if I'm wrong about hat-eating in the future, I will literally eat my hat. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Hqgo2.png) | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On May 26 2012 13:39 EchelonTee wrote: do you even wear hats? pix pls The people demand it, so I will show proof. Here's a picture of my streaming with a totally real hat on. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/OBExWl.png) As you can see, I totally have this hat and AM INDEED prepared to wear it. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
I nominate myself to be the mayor! My platform is this: Elect me mayor and I'm gonna use the d1 lynch on Grush57. Here's his filter from LIV (link). In this game, he was town, and he was utterly inscrutable and lost the game for the town. I submit that Grush can only hurt us, either by being scum, or by being town and looking exactly like scum. ##Vote: Blazinghand Elect me to be mayor, and I will lynch Grush57. This will help us immeasurably. You can already tell from his filter this game that he's either worthless or scum, and I refuse to lose another game because Grush57 is in it. A vote for Blazinghand is a vote to lynch Grush! Funded by the Blazinghand 2012 campaign. My name is Blazinghand and I approve this message. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On May 27 2012 13:25 Sinensis wrote: I would settle for being your VP if it means killing grush. Let's make a deal: If it turns out some punk is gonna win who's NOT lynching Grush, we'll consolidate our voting bases to get one of us elected to make sure grush gets lynched. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On May 27 2012 13:27 Blazinghand wrote: Let's make a deal: If it turns out some punk is gonna win who's NOT lynching Grush, we'll consolidate our voting bases to get one of us elected to make sure grush gets lynched. And by "voting bases" I mean "2 votes" since currently nobody else has voted for us ;_; | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On May 27 2012 13:34 jaj22 wrote: If you're going to policy-lynch someone because they're useless and unreadable, why pick Grush over Kenpachi? Even if Kenpachi is unreadable, he makes vague attempts to TRY to win games when he's town. Grush is always playing for the scumteam regardless of alignment. He must die. On May 27 2012 13:34 jaj22 wrote: I can see why some of you might be bitter from LIV, but at least give people the chance to improve. No. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
In fact, you're willing to let ET, who you admit you like ET but don't know why... and also are hedging on whether or not he's easy to read... but the main thing for mayors is you need to analyze their posts in a serious way? See, you know your own alignment quite well-- you SHOULD know you're town, assuming you are indeed town. If that's the case, why are you trying to get a power that's almost useless for town but super useful for scum? Why not run for mayor? All your reasoning points towards you running for mayor, but you run for vice-mayor and waffle on ET. What's the deal? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On May 27 2012 13:54 Manason wrote: Assuming that Grush is going to be a bad townie is in my opinion a bad move. Give everyone a chance and the fact that your so set on killing this guy makes me wonder as to how easily you'll decide someone else is guilty. I'm all fine with someone who is set on making town lose die, but give him a chance first and condemn later. Rash decisions are what makes town lose. You clearly didn't read the LIV filter I linked if you think somehow Grush wasn't given a chance to be a good townie. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
I will use it if/when I think it will help the town. I make no promises whether or not I will discuss it with anyone or whether I will or won't use it. If I think I can help us win the game, I'll take that opportunity. Typically this will give me a chance to discuss it beforehand, but I will not make stupid rules about how I use my power. I will try to win. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On May 27 2012 14:03 Manason wrote: I did indeed, and regardless I still believe that every game is different and it is only fair to disregard previous player actions. As I said before if there is no change in the way Gush conducts himself on the first day, by all means the mayor may lynch him. But I believe in a mayor that makes an informed decision based on actions in the current game rather than lynching him based on what he "might" do. Oh yes what ever would we do without this useful contributions On May 27 2012 11:21 grush57 wrote: Lemony fresh victory shall belong to us! On May 27 2012 12:17 grush57 wrote: The scum are helping each other out already? On May 27 2012 12:25 grush57 wrote: Having free lynch day1 pretty good, but the scum would probably prefer Vice for protection in case a scum is going to get lynched. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
So, at the time that you wrote it... why on earth were you campaigning to be vice-mayor? On May 27 2012 13:52 Blazinghand wrote: Why not run for mayor? If you really want to try out a blue role, and you really found it fun, and you take things seriously and are easy to subject to analysis, you should WANT the double vote. In fact, you're willing to let ET, who you admit you like ET but don't know why... and also are hedging on whether or not he's easy to read... but the main thing for mayors is you need to analyze their posts in a serious way? See, you know your own alignment quite well-- you SHOULD know you're town, assuming you are indeed town. If that's the case, why are you trying to get a power that's almost useless for town but super useful for scum? Why not run for mayor? All your reasoning points towards you running for mayor, but you run for vice-mayor and waffle on ET. What's the deal? These questions still need to be addressed. What's your deal, S&B? Why did you take those actions? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
So your initial reasoning for why you wanted the role, as you wrote it, was: On May 27 2012 13:46 strongandbig wrote: So, why am I running for vice leader/pardoner? Well, last game I played was my first time being a blue role, and it was really fun; I want to try something new this game as well. But now it's On May 27 2012 15:32 strongandbig wrote: And the question "why are you trying to get a power that's almost useless for town but super useful for scum" has a retardedly obvious answer, doesn't it? So scum can't have that power? Were you lying then or are you lying now? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On May 27 2012 16:36 EchelonTee wrote: Come on BH, he's a newbie. You're acting like a TLMafia brat, threatening to call in the host, which is also unproductive to the discussion. You post gifs and pix of you eating hats all the time, so his reference to your trolling isn't wholly inaccurate lol. Continuing, do you think grush's posting thus far is scummy? If yes, then how so? And his reference to me being a retard? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
| ||
