/in
TL Mafia LI
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
/in | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
1) get secret dayvig role 2) ##shoot bluelightz since I can never get a read on him, even though he's not in the game 3) claim the shot and become confirmed blue 4) ??? 5) win game for town | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2012 20:42 Hassybaby wrote: You can't shoot kenpachi! Who would we have to claim town in the first post? See the reason I can't shoot VE is because I'm a mafia dayvig and he's also scum so i dont' want to shoo thim kk =P | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
._. I'm never escaping that am I | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 06 2012 06:10 Toadesstern wrote: Jackal won't shoot himself, will he? Especially not in the dick. If he were to hydra with wbg he'd maybe do that to perform some weird voodoo crap that harms both of them but I don't see that happening. if he were to hydra with wbg shit would be scary as hell | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
*: Palmar was, in fact, never a noob | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 06 2012 08:10 VisceraEyes wrote: False. Go read PTP1 and then come back in here and say that again sir. Oh don't worry he was still bad he just was never a noob. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
It would appear you (I) did! Given that BH and WBG have never been in a game together as far as anyone knows... ARE WE INDEED THE SAME PERSON? The world will never know. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 07 2012 06:57 wherebugsgo wrote: Storm mafia you idiot Man even my smurf is dumber than me This made my day. your day. whatever | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
So I'm gonna go over this hard and fast, just like you like it baby 4F starts off in what is my opinion a wholly unlikeable and anti town fashion: link He almost immediately retracts his unbelievably bad idea, which I would give him credit for if he had any reason for other than "I don't want to get lynched, as I am scum and my wincon requires me not to get lynched" (link) and I find his vote on S.T to be entirely unsatisfactory, much like my last girlfriend was (link) "Why is it unsatisfactory blzinghand" Here I show you. his reasoning for the S.T vote is a crappy quote a short, unfocused case. Was S.T a bit too wordy in his reply? Verbose in his defense? Well, then that's in S.T's court, surely. But let's take a look at S.T's filter for a moment:S.T Oh hay S.T is in fact a lurker. So... 4F doesn't like the idea of lynching a lurker, he says "lurkers are a weak faction" and that going after them is what scum would do. Personally I think that's wrong. But even assuming that's right, isn't that exactly what 4F is doing? "What's going on here blzinghand I don't understand" Well, S.T is a lurker. Does he have some posts? yeah. but he's posted fuck all shit this entire game. Your post count doesn't determine your lurker status, your content count does. Assuming 4F is wrong, well, he's a moron scum trying to lynch someone who's inadequately defended himself. And assuming his thoughts on lurkers are right, then he's scum since he's trying to push a lurker lynch. Either way... ##vote fourface please detour in my direction, my brother. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 08 2012 23:17 VisceraEyes wrote: Attention Town! Blazinghand is now officially too quiet for my liking! If he's not in here by halfway through the day, I move that he be our very first lurker lynch! Who's with me?! Nobody. you hear that cricket chirping? that's the sound of a crickent because it's silent. "why is it silent blzinghand" it's silent because nobody wants to get on your dumb wagon with your dumb oxen and leave council bluffs, KS, to travel to Williamette River Valley because all you have is 10 grandfather clocks and a hat. Why would you pick that as your starting gear? it's cause you have no idea what you're doing | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 09 2012 01:59 sputnik.theory wrote: Every other person who posts is so quick to accuse people of frivolous shit. You say that I'm a lurker because my statements were 'fuck all shit'? What sort of deep and compelling analysis are you looking for in the first few pages of a mafia thread? What's important is for everyone to get a few words in and start to develop some actual relationships to analyze over the coming days? Check out my posts that is how you be useful. See this post you just made here? This one that's you pretending to be mad because you as scum got caught? That's not helping anyone. hell, it aint even helping you. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Yes, this is the pot calling the kettle black. But the kettle is black as hell so I'm gonna go ahead anyways. Let's see what this man has posted since I prodded him a day and a half ago. On April 09 2012 01:59 sputnik.theory wrote: Every other person who posts is so quick to accuse people of frivolous shit. You say that I'm a lurker because my statements were 'fuck all shit'? What sort of deep and compelling analysis are you looking for in the first few pages of a mafia thread? What's important is for everyone to get a few words in and start to develop some actual relationships to analyze over the coming days? Unacceptable. Utterly unacceptable. Let's check out the rest of S.T's posts.... link Oh hey there's nothing of value posted. No cases, no scumreads, no valuable information other than some BS about %ages or something. He's making posts, but producing, somehow, even less content then myself. Gentlemen, I present to you a that S.T is a scum lurking in plain sight with worthless posts. This should be obvious to anyone with eyes. He's made several decent-length-ish posts about how he doesn't want to lynch townies. Seriously? That's it? That's preposterously bad. In addition to being unhelpful, it's all based on "well if I post I won't be a lurker" and basically is just unhelpful scum play. Let's de-scum our town, shall we? ##unvote ##vote: sputnik.theory | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 10 2012 04:50 Jackal58 wrote: I think Visc is town atm. I don't know what to make of Toad yet. I always want to kill BH and WBG so my opinion of them is very biased. I wouldn't cry is somebody shot either of them at night. A) yay! I'm a vet! B) Screw you too buddy On April 10 2012 04:09 Tunkeg wrote: I find it strange that he leans on 4F and ST. I think this kind of play is anti-town as it may trick the newguys into mistakes that are wrongfully interpid as scumtells. Yeah, get them to talk, but try a more diplomatic way first. Not pin them to the wall. The veterans should be pin to the wall, thats the only way to get them to speak up, but not the new ones, they should be cuddled I'll pin whoever I want to the wall. Going easy on people with fewer games won't help them. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 10 2012 04:54 sputnik.theory wrote: As a innocent player who's been targeted by others as 'scum' I have some misgivings about the judgement of several of the players in this game. They couldn't be more wrong with their analysis of my role and now several of them are jumping on the latest victim in the thread - Janaan. Upon overview of his filter I find nothing heinously scummy. Janaan is a guy who's quick to accuse others and is trying to avoid getting killed on day1. I'm not convinced that this behavior indicates scum over town and I won't be voting for him to die tonight. Oh this came up as I posted my case. HEY S.T. do something useful. Make a post about ANYTHING with a scumread. ANYTHING. AT ALL. just defending your scumbuddy doesn't count as contributing. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 10 2012 05:04 sputnik.theory wrote: I have viewed this turn from a harm-management perspective from the start of the game. There isn't enough useful information to target scum in the game yet. No matter how much you wish there was. I can accept the criticism of not being helpful (yet!) but your jump from bad player to scum player baffles me. There is no substance to your claims. I'm not scum because I want to avoid lynching townies and don't exaggerate the importance of trivial BS. You're scum because you haven't made or pushed a single scumread. You're scum because your entire filter consists of waffling and making no statements. You're scum because you urge caution but offer no advice. You're scum because you're actively hurting town in a deceitful way. And as scum, you shall hang. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On April 10 2012 05:09 sputnik.theory wrote: I may hang but you'll still be wrong. From my perspective you're a idiot for demanding that I make a scumread. To me you're a player making a erroneous scumread. That is exactly what I want I've stated that I want to avoid on this day. Back up off me. So you're telling me that my demand that you make a SINGLE scumread is idiotic? ._. | ||
| ||