EPTStorm Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 21 2012 07:15 redFF wrote: VI policy lynch. I don't like this sort of policy lynch. I don't like policy lynches in general-- they are/should be a last resort. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
I'd rather explicitly try to lynch scum. Policy lynch is what you do if you can't make a good case D1. This happens fairly often but that doesn't mean it's a good thing. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 21 2012 07:33 layabout wrote: If you do not have a good case behind your vote today i expect you to go with a policy lynch. I don't care about your expectations, but if ANYONE doesn't have a good case behind their vote (either for a policy lynch of a scum lynch) then they should be lynched posthaste. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 21 2012 07:31 redFF wrote: Give me one example of a policy lynch occuring on tl mafia ever. I don't think that word means what you think it means. I thought a policy lynch was when you lynch someone for a reason unrelated to "I think this person is scum" such as "I lynch anyone who lies" "I lynch anyone who makes fewer than 3 posts per in-game day" or "I think this guy is a moron so I lynch him every game I play with him" | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 21 2012 09:05 chaoser wrote: Also, your unvote of tyrran was pretty bad redFF and seemed extremely defensive. His post wasn't a good enough post to un-pressure vote. I would never get off him from my vote because his post was NOT good. Yeah tyrran's post is utterly worthless. I'm pretty sure redFF is just trying to duck the spotlight. If your lynching based on policy, I don't see why you wouldn't still want to lynch him now? Policy should still apply, and it's not like Tyrran has been captain mchelpful since showing up in the thread. I guess you're showing your colors ##Vote: redFF come out and play | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 21 2012 09:08 Blazinghand wrote: ##Vote: redFF | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 21 2012 13:06 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm mulling over this post. The first thing I noticed about it is that it still doesn't answer my question. I mean, yeah. Okay. I get it. It's early in the game. But you don't even have a read on the guy? Regardless of the fact that he has almost 25% of the posts since the game started? I realize that's a gross exaggeration, but you see what I'm getting at - you should have more of a read on him than "bad" in my opinion. The next thing I noticed is that you respond to my soft accusation of you coloring the discussion surrounding red as 'policy discussion' by boiling down the argument against him I've made to "his push on tyrran via policy is bad". I get that he's kinda a tool outside this thread, but my argument has to do with his actions/decisions in THIS thread. If anyone is voting for him on policy based on his behavior out-of-thread, that's their thing...but that's absolutely not why I'm voting for him, and that's absolutely not what the discussion for the last few pages has been about. Is it possible that people are voting him on policy? Sure I guess. Has that been the subject of discussion, like, ever? Not so much. This is why I said you "colored" the discussion recently as "policy discussion"...because by my estimation, we've been talking about lynching red because he's scum, and you come in and say "why are we still talking about policy-lynch?" I mean, am I missing something here? I would characterize that is BC's second attempt to dodge. I still don't liked redFF and i don't like the fact that he stopped carrying about his policy lynch. Why is that? I don't like Tyrran and I don't see how Tyrran's current set of posts makes him look town to redFF | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 22 2012 02:19 Toadesstern wrote: second this one. I'm having troubles figuring you out Tyrran. Same about Dirkzor and risk.nuke I think I have him figured out ##Vote: Tyrran | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 22 2012 02:47 redFF wrote: what made me look townier bh? You're still scum | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On February 22 2012 03:03 Tyrran wrote: I'm still at work rigth now, but to make it quick : I dont have any scum read yet. I'm leaning town on several people. I'm wondering about syllo rigth now. He claims to know something we dont about the setup, but doenst share it. I'm not sure if this indicate town or scum. This was very useful, thanks you. You are an important town asset. | ||
| ||
