With Orlando coming up fast, here is an infographic compiled with Anaheim stats on Wins by APM, Race/Matchup, Map Popularity, and Matchups on specific maps. This breakdown and infographic are likes the ones we did for Columbus and Anaheim.

Wins by Matchup: Entire Tournament:

Race Breakdown - P: 85 - Terran: 87 - Zerg: 70

TvZ:
Terran: 57%
Zerg: 43%
154-115

PvZ:
Protoss: 48%
Zerg: 52%
106-114

PvT:
Protoss: 51%
Terran: 49%
149-143

APM (Calculated using in-game time):

coL.DongRaeGu: 274
oGs.NaDa: 270

Here's the full infographic and numbers: http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-raleigh-starcraft-2-by-the-numbers

Slasher

United States1095 Posts

September 15 2011 17:04 GMT

To compare, here was the race matchup breakdown for Columbus and Anaheim:

Columbus:

PvZ:
Protoss: 46.51%
Zerg: 53.49%

PvT:
Protoss: 54%
Terran: 46%

TvZ:
Terran: 43.21%
Zerg: 56.79%

Anaheim:

PvZ:
Protoss: 51.1%
Zerg: 48.9%
144-138

PvT:
Protoss: 48.3%
Terran: 51.7%
171-183

TvZ:
Terran: 56.8%
Zerg: 43.2%
142-108

ZAiNs

United Kingdom6525 Posts

September 15 2011 17:05 GMT

Very balanced

teddyoojo

Germany22369 Posts

September 15 2011 17:05 GMT

interesting, 51% pvt win

Grackodile

United States263 Posts

September 15 2011 17:07 GMT

I don't know why there is so much QQ lately about PvT and PvZ. I know it's just one tournament and all but the only real mu that varies a great deal is ZvT.

Kinky

United States4126 Posts

September 15 2011 17:07 GMT

I love these stats from MLG. Great job!

Amui

Canada10567 Posts

September 15 2011 17:09 GMT

The only matchup I think which needs some help is TvZ. There's something Terran gets that Zerg doesn't.

ohampatu

United States1448 Posts

September 15 2011 17:09 GMT

I dont know how good these results are. Considering the top end of MLG has people of the likes as DRG/Hero, etc. While the bottom end has players at like my skill level.

Edit: id much rather see just the stats from group play and brackets.

Elefanto

Switzerland3584 Posts

September 15 2011 17:10 GMT

On September 16 2011 02:07 Grackodile wrote:
I don't know why there is so much QQ lately about PvT and PvZ. I know it's just one tournament and all but the only real mu that varies a great deal is ZvT.

These numbers aren't indicative of anything, because the discrepancy in skill is often so huge.

Risen

United States7927 Posts

September 15 2011 17:12 GMT

#10

On September 16 2011 02:09 ohampatu wrote:
I dont know how good these results are. Considering the top end of MLG has people of the likes as DRG/Hero, etc. While the bottom end has players at like my skill level.

Edit: id much rather see just the stats from group play and brackets.

This can't be emphasized enough.

ohampatu

United States1448 Posts

September 15 2011 17:13 GMT

#11

On September 16 2011 02:10 Elefanto wrote:

Show nested quote +

These numbers aren't indicative of anything, because the discrepancy in skill is often so huge.

You make no sense there. These numbers are indicative of alot.

I dont need to see the stats of July rolling through open bracket for instance. The stats are skewed because you have alot of good players beating alot of shitty players. Yes, apm, etc can still be found. But you cant honestly graph win/los percentage, when you have players like july/hero rolling open bracket.

Madera

Sweden2672 Posts

September 15 2011 17:14 GMT

#12

Awesome stats, thank you. It's weird how TvZ went from 43.21% in Columbus to 57% in Raleigh.

Derez

Netherlands6068 Posts

September 15 2011 17:15 GMT

#13

On September 16 2011 02:07 Grackodile wrote:
I don't know why there is so much QQ lately about PvT and PvZ. I know it's just one tournament and but the only real mu that varies a great deal is ZvT.

The stats are incredibly skewed for TvZ anyhow. There were 10 matches between koreans T's and foreigner Z's, only 3 matches between koreans Z's and foreigner T's. All of the koreans won.

Makes the win percentage rather meaningless.

On September 16 2011 02:09 Amui wrote:
The only matchup I think which needs some help is TvZ. There's something Terran gets that Zerg doesn't.

Yeah, more good koreans T's playing foreigner Z's then the other way around.

ohampatu

United States1448 Posts

September 15 2011 17:16 GMT

#14

What Derez said. People really can't gleam anything MU based from these stats. Considering who plays in open bracket and the koreans invited, cause that skews all the results. Like i said.

Do this, but only do it from the group play and championship bracket.

RinconH

United States512 Posts

September 15 2011 17:31 GMT

#15

Thanks for compiling but somewhat misleading as you have a group of players (Koreans) far above everyone else who skew the ratios.

The Koreans are going to win no matter what their race.

GSL is the best thing to look at as the skill levels are more uniform.

BroboCop

United States373 Posts

September 15 2011 17:38 GMT

#16

serious question: what can luckyfool do with 230 apm on 1base?

ohampatu

United States1448 Posts

September 15 2011 17:39 GMT

#17

On September 16 2011 02:38 BroboCop wrote:
serious question: what can luckyfool do with 230 apm on 1base?

Lol. You should see some of the old meme's.
I remember a particular one that just had a picture of flash, top part said 300 apm, bottom part said 'only 5 scv's'. Cracked me up everytime i saw it.