BloodyC0bblers's Mafia XVI
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
Inactive people are dumb.... | ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
On January 23 2010 06:13 d3_crescentia wrote: Just to make things clear... Conjecture: If we have a mafia-aligned town official, she/he will not be the Godfather. I think this is a pretty good guess. Unless the mafia is foolish then they wouldn't waste having their one the godfather (who won't show as being mafia when role-checked) as a person who in fact cannot be role checked anyway. | ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
I dunno, linking technical drawing to my aka to a wiki article is kinda far imo. And if you look what an arcology is, it doesn't have much to do with drawing. I also don't think QuickStriker is mafia just because the word quick has been used in the clue entries. I just don't see bloodycobbler making it that obvious. In day two the phrase "valiant struggle" and "blade" make me think they could be clues linking to VelkanKnight. | ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
On January 25 2010 11:08 Iaaan wrote: Honestly I think Xelin is a townie, hes just kinda angry/irrational I don't see why that behavior would lead you to believe he is a townie any more than mafia. | ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
On January 28 2010 12:44 dozko wrote: + Show Spoiler + On January 24 2010 09:57 dozko wrote: My analysis of the day 2 clues. The bold ones are the ones I think are the most significant. 1) Quickstriker + Show Spoiler + - The figure may refer to the chess piece in the picture of his profile, as in a chess figurine. - "Object in his hands" although the piece is not "long", it is being held in the hands of the character - Note how the guy in his picture is slightly tilted to one side and it could be said he is "looking over his shoulder". Also those large expressive , jap art eyes can easily be linked to the "gaze", "eyes gazing" 2) iplaythings+ Show Spoiler + - The murdered were playing a "late night game" 3) drinking + Show Spoiler + - Note he joined TL on the 31 of December. I would classify this as a pretty memorable night. 4) softer + Show Spoiler + - In his profile quote: "Visualize success, but dont believe your eyes. I think this matches up really well with the quote from the narration "They were on watch the entire night, they figured that would be enough. They figured wrong." 5) no_re + Show Spoiler + - They played a bowling game, but it was their last one since they got pwnt by the killers and therefore will never be able to regame. 6) shockeyy + Show Spoiler + - Look at his profile pic. He's got the red eye effect in the photo, which makes his eyes look very expressive due to the black background. I believe this could be a reference to the "hypnotized" gaze in the narration, as his eyes look very menacing and hypnosis is usually done with a strong eye contact. Out of the bolded ones I believe the clue towards drinking is the most believable, since it is not very obvious but it still is not too far fetched. However the clue towards softer is very strong since we have a match of a whole sentence. Given that both these have had clue references in day 1 (i.e. the water for drinking and "tenderly" for softer) i currently believe that these two are the most likely to be mafia. Therefore I will vote for softer to be lynched for now, unless i hear some convincing arguments in his defense, since he has not replied in his defense to my day1 post stating the "tenderness" clue and he generally is keeping a low profile, but people should keep an eye on drinking as well since his clue is very persuasive IMO. dozko, let me first say thanks for doing such extensive analysis to give us all information to review and consider. The thing is you have a lot of leads and so far we're yet to catch a mafia member. I think that some of the leads must be correct but it is certainly hard to know which ones. We also don't exactly know what method BC is using to lay clues. I think that if we can get a mafia member on this turn we should continue along the same path but otherwise maybe we should put less emphasis on the clues and more on examining people's postng behaviors and trying to see if we can figure out motives from that. With so many inactives it does present a problem though... I wish there was a way to check if people were viewing the thread even if they aren't posting because that would lead me to believe they are mafia rather than noobs who signed up for mafia and are dumb townies who aren't caring to participate. | ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
| ||