EPT[GSL] 2012 Jan Code S RO32 D4 - Page 66
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Yang Wenli
United States2283 Posts
| ||
|
kappadevin
United States284 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:23 kappadevin wrote: 16:00 Big engagement near the center of the map, but Bomber with good marine micro manages to save a huge amount of his marines and is now killing a ton of free overlords, now pushing into Curious's 3rd. 17:30 The 3rd for Curious goes down, a few banelings come out and get some sick hits on the marines, but he was too far behind already. Curious GG's. | ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:22 Tobberoth wrote: Polls should be something like: * Overall worth watching * Player A worth watching * Player B worth watching * Not worth watching I mean if it's a ZvP and the Z plays awesome, I don't care if the game is onesided or whatever, I want to see it since I'm zerg. ....How is that not spoiling the result? | ||
|
figq
12519 Posts
+ drastically reducing their vision in such mode, of course. | ||
|
Mobius_1
United Kingdom2763 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:23 Mobius_1 wrote: 12:00 Infantry is now 1/1, Lings are 1/1, 4th base for Curious at 11, Spire and Bane speed morphing Bomber getting Medivacs, adding factory, 2/2 infantry and 1 mech attack 14:00 Bomber pushes towards central tower but creep and Curious already there SO MUCH CREEP 15:00 Mutas finally out for Curious but Bomber slow pushing towards Zerg home 16:00 Curious attempts flank but Bomber has too many Marines and Tanks 17:40 Bomber is sieged between natural and 3rd of Curious and continually reinforcing with Marines, Curious with last ditch attack but GG's as his last Banelings crash into Marines ST_Bomber 1-0 ST_Curious | ||
|
Thinasy
2856 Posts
| ||
|
BatCat
Austria630 Posts
| ||
|
milesfacade
United Kingdom799 Posts
 | ||
|
dormer
United States1314 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:23 Seeker wrote: Hmmmmmmm damn..... I like this idea. AND IT MAKES SENSE TOO Oo But then it kind of tells you who won, which people may or may not care about. P was worth watching, Z wasn't probably means that P won, or the better player lost. | ||
|
Mafe
Germany5966 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:22 Tobberoth wrote: Polls should be something like: * Overall worth watching * Player A worth watching * Player B worth watching * Not worth watching I mean if it's a ZvP and the Z plays awesome, I don't care if the game is onesided or whatever, I want to see it since I'm zerg. A lot of people actually want to see exciting games without spoilers. | ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
| ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:24 Seraphone wrote: Saying who plays well is basically going to be a spoiler is most cases. its a LR thread LOL | ||
|
_Galad_
Greece184 Posts
| ||
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:24 Seraphone wrote: Saying who plays well is basically going to be a spoiler is most cases. Doesn't have to be like that. It might be an indication, I agree, but I can think of many games where the loser is worth watching because of innovative play, good defense, amazing comeback which still failed etc. | ||
|
Nocteo
Belgium799 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:24 Hassybaby wrote: ....How is that not spoiling the result? I doubt you can come in this thread unspoiled. | ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7996 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:24 Hassybaby wrote: ....How is that not spoiling the result? just make it 3 options and combine 2 and 3 into "one player is worth watching" maybe | ||
|
PikaXchU
Singapore379 Posts
| ||
|
kappadevin
United States284 Posts
| ||
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:25 Tsubbi wrote: just make it 3 options and combine 2 and 3 into "one player is worth watching" maybe This is much better indeed. | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
Exactly. You know that if Seeker's made a poll like that, shit went down and it'll be entertaining in some way. Good point in theory  . But for example in the Inca vs Oz proxy gate game, I don't think it was worth it. I mean Inca proxy gated and mismicroed at some point. Is that really worth a "WTF!" option? | ||
| ||
