EPT[GSL] 2012 Jan Code S RO32 D4 - Page 65
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Urth
United States1256 Posts
| ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
| ||
|
supraWman
Germany453 Posts
| ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
| ||
|
EatCrow
Estonia333 Posts
| ||
Destructicon
4713 Posts
| ||
|
Haydin
United States1481 Posts
EDIT: DESTRUCTION WE THINK SO ALIKE | ||
|
Demonaz
United Kingdom1219 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37120 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:22 Tobberoth wrote: Polls should be something like: * Overall worth watching * Player A worth watching * Player B worth watching * Not worth watching I mean if it's a ZvP and the Z plays awesome, I don't care if the game is onesided or whatever, I want to see it since I'm zerg. Hmmmmmmm damn..... I like this idea. AND IT MAKES SENSE TOO Oo | ||
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
Well to be fair, it usually means the game had some sort of weirdness to it. Not everyone might wanna watch a game like that and rather watch a straight up solid good game. If it were better split between Yes and No, you can usually tell whether the game was a troll game or a truly epic game. Also, poll options tend to bias votes. | ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51701 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:22 Tobberoth wrote: Polls should be something like: * Overall worth watching * Player A worth watching * Player B worth watching * Not worth watching I mean if it's a ZvP and the Z plays awesome, I don't care if the game is onesided or whatever, I want to see it since I'm zerg. general form of polls is always Yes No If you have time. | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37120 Posts
| ||
|
whirlpool
2788 Posts
| ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:22 Tobberoth wrote: Polls should be something like: * Overall worth watching * Player A worth watching * Player B worth watching * Not worth watching I mean if it's a ZvP and the Z plays awesome, I don't care if the game is onesided or whatever, I want to see it since I'm zerg. That's pretty bad actually, if one players has a massive amount of "worth watching" you can basically guarantee that that player won. | ||
|
Leetley
1796 Posts
| ||
|
darcevader88
Canada648 Posts
| ||
|
Seraphone
United Kingdom1219 Posts
On January 12 2012 20:22 Tobberoth wrote: Polls should be something like: * Overall worth watching * Player A worth watching * Player B worth watching * Not worth watching I mean if it's a ZvP and the Z plays awesome, I don't care if the game is onesided or whatever, I want to see it since I'm zerg. Saying who plays well is basically going to be a spoiler is most cases. | ||
| ||
