EPTI also can see bugs being scum. Also makes sense if the game is balanced. That scum would get one vet.
Its to bad Bugs is to distracted to give this game his all tho, well maybe not so bad for town :3
Hero Mini Mafia - Page 54
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
I also can see bugs being scum. Also makes sense if the game is balanced. That scum would get one vet. Its to bad Bugs is to distracted to give this game his all tho, well maybe not so bad for town :3 | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On December 12 2012 18:18 wherebugsgo wrote: The fact that I ultimately chose not to vote him is actually not scummy, because trust me, I'm pretty fucking lazy as scum. I'm notoriously "hard to read" because my play doesn't boil down to "lazy as scum and active as town" unlike the vast majority of other players. so you are lazy as town or is one of those statements wrong? | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
Bugs didn't vote Adam, so he must be scum. I'm completely serious, I will tunnel the fuck out of him tomorrow. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On December 12 2012 18:23 thrawn2112 wrote: so you are lazy as town or is one of those statements wrong? nah I'm lazy as scum. I just don't look lazy. Just look at how hard I trolled Storm Mafia, for example. It doesn't take much effort for me to troll a game, but I post a fuckton more than as town. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On December 12 2012 18:18 wherebugsgo wrote: How have I blended in when I made probably the strongest counter case to Adam? I didn't have to do that. If I was scum and wanted to blend in I could've just bandwagoned on what was clearly the easiest lynch of the day and taken massive town cred by bussing Adam. Instead I chose to pose an alternative because I actually took a stance on someone other than Adam. Everyone found him scummy. I found someone else scummier. And, in fact, Tunkeg's play is still quite erratic. Making a case on lynch-bait isn't "sticking out" by any measure, and I have no idea why you're representing your play as such. Also, these "I would have done this as scum" arguments ring pretty hollow. Secondly, the thing I absolutely hate about this type of jubjub logic is that it only makes sense when you don't think. Why are people attacking me? Because I was the only notable person who didn't hardline against Adam. This is confirmation bias. We saw a scum flip, and now everyone thinks that anyone who was late to the wagon or considered killing other people is scum. Sure, that's normal when there's resistance, but when there was never any resistance to begin with usually it's the people who sheep without reason who are the scum bussing. I.E. VE. I actually had concrete reasons to be voting Adam and I was one of the first players to make my opinion on him clear. The fact that I ultimately chose not to vote him is actually not scummy, because trust me, I'm pretty fucking lazy as scum. People aren't attacking you because only you didn't go after Adam. You haven't been very active, and you've spent most of Day 1 tunneling lynch bait. Also, lazy as scum? From what I've heard, you're one of the better scum-players around these parts. So, think about it for a second. You think I'm scum and you apparently hold me to a higher standard than other players. So, what exactly have I done that is not up to your standards? I'm not taking risks? You don't need to take risks to play town! In fact, taking risks is full on retarded as town. I don't think anyone on this forum understands how I operate as scum, seeing as everyone and their mother accuses me of wildly different things as both alignments. I'm notoriously "hard to read" because my play doesn't boil down to "lazy as scum and active as town" unlike the vast majority of other players I'm not saying that everyone should take "risks" by pulling a Thrawn and claiming miller. But townies (especially veteran townies) will stick their neck out and try to comment on a bunch of things, make reads, tunnel multiple players... etc. When I say you haven't taken any "risks", you haven't done anything but tunnel lynch-bait. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On December 12 2012 18:27 Palmar wrote: Hey look guys, here's some perfect logic: Bugs didn't vote Adam, so he must be scum. I'm completely serious, I will tunnel the fuck out of him tomorrow. go for it, noob. If you're town, you really are just nothing more than a noob for thinking I'm scum. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On December 12 2012 18:27 Hapahauli wrote: Making a case on lynch-bait isn't "sticking out" by any measure, and I have no idea why you're representing your play as such. Also, these "I would have done this as scum" arguments ring pretty hollow. So you think no one stuck out on d1 then? Adam was pretty fucking obvious lynch bait. He just happened to be scum. Being lynch bait is not alignment indicative, it's just indicative of playing like shit. On December 12 2012 18:27 Hapahauli wrote: People aren't attacking you because only you didn't go after Adam. You haven't been very active, and you've spent most of Day 1 tunneling lynch bait. I haven't been very active? THE FUCK? I have been far more active than probably everyone else in this game. Yet, you call ME "not very active"? LOL. On December 12 2012 18:27 Hapahauli wrote: Also, lazy as scum? From what I've heard, you're one of the better scum-players around these parts. Being good at something doesn't mean it takes effort. I'm not even good at scum anyway. On December 12 2012 18:27 Hapahauli wrote: I'm not saying that everyone should take "risks" by pulling a Thrawn and claiming miller. But townies (especially veteran townies) will stick their neck out and try to comment on a bunch of things, make reads, tunnel multiple players... etc. When I say you haven't taken any "risks", you haven't done anything but tunnel lynch-bait. Name one thing I haven't commented on this game. What have I been avoiding in discussion? Nothing you say is backed up by any evidence, it's just a load of shit. You're just saying stuff with tinted goggles and trying to fit your preconceived notion of my alignment to actual evidence. The problem is that there is no evidence ,so you're just making things up as you go along. If you're town, try setting aside your preconceived notions about my alignment. Go read my posts this game in context. Go read posts from my most recent game. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
Think about it carefully. Why do you think I was so opposed to lynching jay? Why do you think I questioned Palmar's motivations when he told me reads that didn't make sense to me? (i.e. the tunkeg, jay, djo, me reads etc.) if you really think I'm avoiding commenting on things then you're probably not reading the game very carefully. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On December 12 2012 18:27 wherebugsgo wrote: go for it, noob. If you're town, you really are just nothing more than a noob for thinking I'm scum. Oh shit you hurt my feelings. But are you not the noob for not supporting my case on Adam? Oh wait, you're not, because you're scum. I mean after all we can conclusively prove that I was right. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On December 12 2012 16:07 Djodref wrote: He did it when it was not sure yet that Adam would be lynched. And he discedited people voting Adam. ”there is scum pn this wagon” Hello Djodref: You are not required to post anything more at all in this thread. Everything you've said has been dumb, useless and I think you're either scum or bad. In both cases, please just shut up and only vote according to what I tell you. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On December 12 2012 18:46 Palmar wrote: Oh shit you hurt my feelings. But are you not the noob for not supporting my case on Adam? Oh wait, you're not, because you're scum. I mean after all we can conclusively prove that I was right. keep it coming noob shit On December 11 2012 13:43 wherebugsgo wrote: Ok, caught up on the thread. Today I had a final and tomorrow I have 2, so I'm not going to be around very much. I'll try to consolidate my thoughts briefly but here's the basic summary of my initial thoughts: I'm almost completely certain that all of the scum are being fairly passive. Adam, Tunkeg, Vivax, Bluelightz are all good leads IMO. I would have said Zbo earlier, but I have my doubts now given how he posted later (though he didn't improve by much, it was enough). I'm gonna get on my computer in a minute so that I can actually quote stuff I found noteworthy. On December 11 2012 19:10 wherebugsgo wrote: yeah I'm fine with killing Adam if Tunkeg isn't getting lynched. I'd prefer Tunkeg obviously but Adam's #2 on my list. On December 11 2012 22:30 wherebugsgo wrote: not like it really matters, but probably: Tunkeg Adam Munk-E one of ZB/VE/you/BL I feel very strongly that among the first 3 there are at least 2 scum. I don't think I am wrong about more than one of them, because Tunkeg + Adam in particular don't play like this as town from what I know. . ![[image loading]](http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/198/460/iwkoqt.gif?1321057725) | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
In case I'm not back in time: someone protect Palmar, he might be a noob but he's probably town. vigis hold your shots unless you feel like shooting Tunkeg or VE. + Show Spoiler + or, shoot me so I don't have to keep fucking around defending myself against idiots | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On December 12 2012 18:57 wherebugsgo wrote: shoot me so I don't have to keep fucking around defending myself against people who are right Now this I can get behind. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Point number one: "Because he will probably the lynch" your explanation "Oooh red font will make the reader totally understand that this point is scummy for no reason at all that I have explained :D" Point number two: "Something about sheeping" Uhh, the point I pointed out was indeed strange, and in my opinion, scummy. Does it take red font for someone to understand that a point is scummy? I gave this note out because one, I based my Adam vote on this and the existing cases, and two because this helps push my target (Adam). On December 12 2012 09:49 Clarity_nl wrote: Adam where's your crumb? ##Vote Adam4167 You are clearly sheeping too clarity. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On December 12 2012 20:39 Palmar wrote: Hey bluelightz, you down for killing bugs tomorrow? I'm fine if there's a consensus on bugs. | ||
| ||
