| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:11 Conversion wrote: no, but what you should do is act whiny and reply to people who object to your obviously bad town play and just cause more spam. you're playing great, keep it up. /clap Will do! | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
The main difference between that game and this one so far is his thread presence. On UG, he was one of the more active posters and played a pro-town game (enough so to draw a day one medic save). When pushing a lynch, he got pretty aggressive. As for how he responded to pressure, it probably wasn't the best game to gauge. The scum team had a flawless victory so there really wasn't much for him to worry about. He did do a decent job of blending in though, as this was posted in post-game: I think the biggest shock to me was Irish being mafia, you play one hell of a stealthy game. On May 05 2011 07:38 chaoser wrote: 1) His reaction to my barely there pressure on him was an overreaction to say the least, I already mentioned this in another post earlier that you can go look up. Looking back, I think his overreaction was probably overstated. He came off worried, but that alone isn't really enough to make him guilty. On May 05 2011 04:22 Irish_Punk13 wrote: Okay, for now my vote is going on AirbladeOrange for his last post. I don't like the fact that he's okay with the idea of lynching town. Kurumi is making some great posts so far, and I think he's most likely town based off of his actions so far. The fact that you think it's okay to lynch him tells me that you're probably scum, so I'm putting my vote on you. Of his posts so far, this one feels the most off. I must have missed all the great posts by Kurumi. Most of them were either spam or left me pretty confused. Not sure how he gets a town read off that. Jumping on AO seems pretty convenient, but at the same time, he was apparently "joking" about a policy lynch. I would like to hear more from him in the next 24 hours. If he doesn't handle pressure well, then it would be beneficial to try to force a slip out of him. The other person who I would like to here more from is chaos13. After his weird guilty post about defending irish, he has posted mostly questions and one-liners. | ||
|
Rising_Phoenix
United States370 Posts
| ||
|
AirbladeOrange
United States2573 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On May 04 2011 22:41 Kurumi wrote: I thought I will have any heavy read by the time I am back and game starts but.. the only thing I saw was CHAOS. Saying that,while someone says this,posting some rules being in the other thread,just doing a contribution without any value On May 04 2011 22:48 sandroba wrote: Ok, so I've caught up right now and something in particular has caught my attention. That's all fine and all but the thing I find extremelly suspicious about this post is this: Chaoser points out how redtooth post is pro-town and then he proceeds to do exactly what redtooth did. Why are making such a huge effort to appear pro-town chaoser? This post would have exactly the same content without the bolded part. The only thing this part adds is making YOU look more town. On May 05 2011 00:56 Kurumi wrote: Drop Chaoser discussion as scum. He will be probably shot this night because he is good at Mafia and is staying really pro-town. It is good to see some lurkers waking up! I think it's a bad idea to ever drop "who is scummy" discussion. Town needs to be focused on hunting mafia at all times. On May 05 2011 01:07 Kurumi wrote: Chaoser,You wouldn't make any effort to defend Yourself if they were onto something,note that Irish backed off into the shadows,while You try to do something. You have two different approaches to play. Sandroba tries to play the Town Hero,he "has" the sense! Chaos13 does not know what is going on anymore. I don't understand this at all. He has a bunch of other posts that don't really especially around page 20 and before. Eternalmisfit tried to analyze some of those posts on page 20. On May 05 2011 04:22 Irish_Punk13 wrote: Okay, for now my vote is going on AirbladeOrange for his last post. I don't like the fact that he's okay with the idea of lynching town. Kurumi is making some great posts so far, and I think he's most likely town based off of his actions so far. The fact that you think it's okay to lynch him tells me that you're probably scum, so I'm putting my vote on you. I have asked repeatedly for you to back this up and you have not. Where are Kurumi's "great posts?" I feel that Kurumi's posts are erratic and unfocused. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 09:32 Cthsazsa wrote: If you say so big guy. On May 05 2011 09:22 Cthsazsa wrote: You can quit trolling me now. On May 05 2011 09:09 Cthsazsa wrote: I bet that's very entertaining. On May 05 2011 08:42 Cthsazsa wrote: Nice conclusion there, Jackal. Very intelligent. So many of Cthsazsa's posts are wannabe aloof and flip, trying to shut down discussion. So much passive aggressiveness seems to me like you are trying way to hard to seem above suspicion. | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On May 05 2011 04:22 Irish_Punk13 wrote: Okay, for now my vote is going on AirbladeOrange for his last post. I don't like the fact that he's okay with the idea of lynching town. Kurumi is making some great posts so far, and I think he's most likely town based off of his actions so far. The fact that you think it's okay to lynch him tells me that you're probably scum, so I'm putting my vote on you. I've changed my vote from AO to Irish after rereading this post several times. It really makes no sense. Kurumi rambles on with posts that makes just about no sense, and out of the blue Irish takes up his defence by saying the bolded words. This has pretty much been pointed out by several people. Maybe Kumuri and Irish both are scum. | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:31 elmizzt wrote: So many of Cthsazsa's posts are wannabe aloof and flip, trying to shut down discussion. So much passive aggressiveness seems to me like you are trying way to hard to seem above suspicion. What else is there to say? He's calling me scum for no real reason. Apparently he's trying to throw off everyone and get us to waste our day 1 votes. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:34 Cthsazsa wrote: What else is there to say? He's calling me scum for no real reason. Apparently he's trying to throw off everyone and get us to waste our day 1 votes. It's possible, I doubt that he wants that though. More likely he was trying to see how you react to some mild pressure. But your way overreaction and attitude makes me think that a vote for you on day 1 wouldn't be wasted at all. | ||
|
KillerSOS
United States4207 Posts
| ||
|
GGQ
Canada2653 Posts
| ||
|
GGQ
Canada2653 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:47 KillerSOS wrote: As much as I hate to join on the bandwagon, a vote for Cthsazsa seems to be a reasonable decision. Judging from your posts, you don't seem to hate joining bandwagons at all. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
Cthsazsa, you've used the "they want us to waste our votes" twice now, I believe. I've got my eye on you. You didn't respond well to jackal's tunneling, and now you disregard the reason elmizzt voted for you. FoS | ||
|
KillerSOS
United States4207 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:48 GGQ wrote: Judging from your posts, you don't seem to hate joining bandwagons at all. I had to start somewhere eh? Wrote up some basic analysis posts afterwards. Like I said, first time on forum mafia, I'm used to playing in a big circle where blue and red are decided by who has the aces or queens... ^_^ | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:49 VarpuliS wrote: elmizzt, do you often refer to yourself in the third person? Cthsazsa, you've used the "they want us to waste our votes" twice now, I believe. I've got my eye on you. You didn't respond well to jackal's tunneling, and now you disregard the reason elmizzt voted for you. FoS I don't normally, and I don't think I did in those posts? o.O Unless you misread or I typed ambiguously. Or unless you are referring to something else. Clarify please?  | ||
|
jaminz
United States208 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:47 KillerSOS wrote: As much as I hate to join on the bandwagon, a vote for Cthsazsa seems to be a reasonable decision. Yet another post with no information/analysis. Why are you jumping onto the Cthsazsa bandwagon? | ||
|
KillerSOS
United States4207 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:58 jaminz wrote: Yet another post with no information/analysis. Why are you jumping onto the Cthsazsa bandwagon? Because the people who have provided analysis on his posts seem to be the most correct? Cthsazsa posts alot like me... short and numerous. For some reason I feel as though it might be the incorrect method of play, but it is enjoyable to say the least. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:58 elmizzt wrote: I don't normally, and I don't think I did in those posts? o.O Unless you misread or I typed ambiguously. Or unless you are referring to something else. Clarify please? Look at this post. Cthsazsa quotes you, responds to your post by saying: What else is there to say? He's calling me scum for no real reason. Your response is in the third person, even though he was asking about you. lol.Apparently he's trying to throw off everyone and get us to waste our day 1 votes. On May 05 2011 12:44 elmizzt wrote: It's possible, I doubt that he wants that though. More likely he was trying to see how you react to some mild pressure. But your way overreaction and attitude makes me think that a vote for you on day 1 wouldn't be wasted at all. | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On May 05 2011 12:44 elmizzt wrote: It's possible, I doubt that he wants that though. More likely he was trying to see how you react to some mild pressure. But your way overreaction and attitude makes me think that a vote for you on day 1 wouldn't be wasted at all. So posting one-liners in response to being called scum is an overreaction? On May 05 2011 12:49 VarpuliS wrote: elmizzt, do you often refer to yourself in the third person? Cthsazsa, you've used the "they want us to waste our votes" twice now, I believe. I've got my eye on you. You didn't respond well to jackal's tunneling, and now you disregard the reason elmizzt voted for you. FoS I wasn't aware he voted for me? And how exactly did I desregard it when I haven't had the chance to address it until now? Also, how exactly are you supposed to respond to Jackal's tunneling? Was I supposed to make a freakout reply as soon as he called me scum? And you didn't answer me when I asked "What else was I supposed to say?" | ||
|
jaminz
United States208 Posts
On May 05 2011 13:02 KillerSOS wrote: Because the people who have provided analysis on his posts seem to be the most correct? Cthsazsa posts alot like me... short and numerous. For some reason I feel as though it might be the incorrect method of play, but it is enjoyable to say the least. I don't understand your posts. You acknowledge that your posting isn't helping anything, and even say it's the wrong way to play. Yet you seem to decide that it's fun so you'll keep doing it. | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Wardi Open
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
Online Event
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
