EPTC9++ Mini Mafia - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
Probulous is also a good lynch candidate for a day 1 lynch. But lynch is coming up fast and we need to consolidate soon. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On March 20 2012 04:48 Dirkzor wrote: I'm inclined to believe that scum is not where I think they are day 1. Which is why I'm pushing xsksc. Tobon and Johnny are the easy outs which never produce scum anyway. Probulous is also a good lynch candidate for a day 1 lynch. But lynch is coming up fast and we need to consolidate soon. Unless I'm misinterprating that, you're pushing to lynch me because I'm not one of the places you would have found scum? I'd love to defend myself here, but you're giving me nothing. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
On March 20 2012 04:48 xsksc wrote: Also, has anyone actually come to a conclusive opinnion about ANYONE today, dirkzor? People are changing their minds left right and centre. No. My scum read on you is not conslusive either. But at least I've taken a stance where you have not. I'm trying to push this forward while all your activity have done nothing more then increase the post count. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On March 20 2012 04:45 johnnywup wrote: I won't oppose [Snarfs] lynching though. I still haven't decided on my final vote. On March 20 2012 04:46 johnnywup wrote: Responding to dirkzor. I'm still leaning towards voting for tobon Don't the italicized statements kinda contradict each other?  | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Yeah, reading comprehension. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
##vote Snarfs | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On March 20 2012 04:50 Dirkzor wrote: No. My scum read on you is not conslusive either. But at least I've taken a stance where you have not. I'm trying to push this forward while all your activity have done nothing more then increase the post count. The thread would have been dead for hours last night if not for me, just because you're pushing a silly lynch doesn't mean your activity or stance is productive. Can you point out where I've been posting to increase post count? I've been asking productive questions and keeping the thread alive, while you "push this forward" with a case that you don't even have a proper reason for. This "not taking a stance and trying to blend in and hide" nonsense can be applied to most of the players in the game, least of all me, lol. You're not pushing anything forward with this, you're just wasting my time. I'll write you a nice shiny conclusion because that's what you seem to be after. My stance is wanting to see SlOosh flip, noone else wants this, so I'll see what Sandroba (near confirmed, strong town player, and people will actually listen to him) comes up with. Happy? Good. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
On March 20 2012 04:50 xsksc wrote: Unless I'm misinterprating that, you're pushing to lynch me because I'm not one of the places you would have found scum? I'd love to defend myself here, but you're giving me nothing. What I'm saying is that the one everyone find scummy day1 always ends up being town who made some stupid mistake during the day and everyone can agree that its stupid and therefor lynches that person. Tobon and Johnny fits that. I'm looking at the 2nd row of suspects. Either way, I'm skimming trough your filter (again) and I might be just the way you write your suspicions. You never really put words to why exactly you find him scummy - or not in a case-way, if that makes sense. Just that you disagreed and then you voted him. Reading Sloosh's filter now. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
He said previously he didn't have any opinion on snarfs when talking to VE, but he took 3 min to filter him this game, look at the filter I posted from the previous game, compare, think about it and come to the conclusion he is scum. I don't believe that is possible. ##Unvote ##Vote Jackal58 | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 20 2012 04:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Go read Snarfs' filter from Wiggles Mini...Sandroba posted link. Then come read his filter in this game. Just don't worry about the RolePM bullshit. Honestly, if you give me more time you'll see the same person. I've already explained twice that between yesterday and the day before I was on the computer all of about an hour and a half. I think you're putting too much weight on the fact that I haven't been here. Also appreciate that in the last game I was never under any pressure so you have nothing to compare that to now. This is me trying to make up for the fact that I was gone for almost 2 full days and during that time you said you weren't going to listen to anybody who wasn't voting. So what do I do when I see a more veteran player saying that they're not going to listen to anybody who isn't voting? I put my vote on the person I think is most likely to be scum and then try to reason it out. If you have any specific questions for me please ask right away. Ask me my motives for anything I've done or haven't done so far this game and I will answer completely truthfully because, as I've said before, I have absolutely nothing to hide. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On March 20 2012 04:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Go read Snarfs' filter from Wiggles Mini...Sandroba posted link. Then come read his filter in this game. Just don't worry about the RolePM bullshit. Well, what's done is done. There is no way we can just ignore info that was presented to us and pretend it never happened. Pretty unlikely snarfs is scum, no matter how he posted before =/ | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On March 20 2012 05:02 Dirkzor wrote: What I'm saying is that the one everyone find scummy day1 always ends up being town who made some stupid mistake during the day and everyone can agree that its stupid and therefor lynches that person. Tobon and Johnny fits that. I'm looking at the 2nd row of suspects. Either way, I'm skimming trough your filter (again) and I might be just the way you write your suspicions. You never really put words to why exactly you find him scummy - or not in a case-way, if that makes sense. Just that you disagreed and then you voted him. Reading Sloosh's filter now. I made it quite clear I think, that the first reason I suspected him, was because of just how bad his case was. Then, when I queried him THREE times about Johnny and his early early town read on him, he neglected to comment every single time. He later said his reason was that his case had nothing to do with Johnnys alignment, which is total bullshit. What does a town player have to hide about giving info on his reads? Then, once others have given a town opinnion on johnny, he says "I think the same as those guys!". I think he is scummy as fuck and should hang, I would like peoples opinnions on sloosh actually, sandroba/jcarls in particular. And you need to read filters LESS and read the actual thread MORE, Dirkzor, to see how interactions actually took place. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
| ||
