| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
The thing that ISN'T circumstancial is the fact that the lynch on me gently drifted into being without anyone trying to prevent it. You should be able to discern the difference between the two. Engage logic please. Although Snarfs only has one vote less than me, I'm going to unvote him and vote for the no-lynch. It has good grounding and with no-one being certain of anything it seems a decent option at this point. ##Unvote ##Vote: No Lynch | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
##unvote ##vote: MrZentor | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On April 24 2012 06:47 Ace wrote: @Snarfs: Where are the posts that show marvelosity soft defending players? I admit I could have read further into it than it really was, but it definitely stood out as the only thing in his filter at the time I posted: Defending: Forumite (that's who Zentor was calling thick), VE, Mr Zentor thrice, and Ace. I prefer to let people answer questions about their play themselves which is why I called him out on it. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On April 24 2012 06:58 marvellosity wrote: Toad, your point is just terrible. The fact that I wasn't mentioned earlier in the game is extremely circumstancial. There were many non-posters and lurkers at the start of the game The thing that ISN'T circumstancial is the fact that the lynch on me gently drifted into being without anyone trying to prevent it. You should be able to discern the difference between the two. Engage logic please. Although Snarfs only has one vote less than me, I'm going to unvote him and vote for the no-lynch. It has good grounding and with no-one being certain of anything it seems a decent option at this point. ##Unvote ##Vote: No Lynch Ok I said I'm going to bed but I can't stand this... Think about C9++. How much people did that game have trying to prevent a Jackal lynch on d1? 0. What did Jackal flip? Mafia People trying to prevent or not trying to prevent a lynch is not an alignment tell at all and actually there's a SHITLOAD of people trying to prevent your lynch right now ALTHOUGH they said they'd be up for a marv lynch. What kind of mofo action is that supposed to be. And it's not the point that you weren't mentioned earlier in the game but the fact that you did not get a single mention until 2 hours before the lynch or something like that. That's not "earlier in the game", that basicly the whole day1. --- Toad | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 24 2012 06:58 marvellosity wrote: Toad, your point is just terrible. The fact that I wasn't mentioned earlier in the game is extremely circumstancial. There were many non-posters and lurkers at the start of the game The thing that ISN'T circumstancial is the fact that the lynch on me gently drifted into being without anyone trying to prevent it. You should be able to discern the difference between the two. Engage logic please. Although Snarfs only has one vote less than me, I'm going to unvote him and vote for the no-lynch. It has good grounding and with no-one being certain of anything it seems a decent option at this point. ##Unvote ##Vote: No Lynch Just because someone doesn't oppose your wagon on Day 1 doesn't make you innocent. I showed up late and asked Snarfs where are the posts of you soft defending people. Other than that I don't see what you really did wrong. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 07:04 SamuelLJackson wrote: Ok I said I'm going to bed but I can't stand this... Think about C9++. How much people did that game have trying to prevent a Jackal lynch on d1? 0. What did Jackal flip? Mafia People trying to prevent or not trying to prevent a lynch is not an alignment tell at all and actually there's a SHITLOAD of people trying to prevent your lynch right now ALTHOUGH they said they'd be up for a marv lynch. What kind of mofo action is that supposed to be. And it's not the point that you weren't mentioned earlier in the game but the fact that you did not get a single mention until 2 hours before the lynch or something like that. That's not "earlier in the game", that basicly the whole day1. --- Toad Considerably more people trying to prevent my lynch than there are scum, in fact... | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 07:04 Ace wrote: Just because someone doesn't oppose your wagon on Day 1 doesn't make you innocent. I showed up late and asked Snarfs where are the posts of you soft defending people. Other than that I don't see what you really did wrong. I know it doesn't, but it's not a totally unreasonable heuristic either. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
Commercial Break! ![[image loading]](http://www.wheeloffortune.com/downloads/vannawallpaper/wallpapers/mywallpapers/1280x1024_mywallpaper-20120423160522.jpg) "Alright ladies and gentlemen, our first round of action has commenced! After some heated back and forth in some very exciting word games, a decision has been reached. Vanna, would you please reveal the result of the voting? Who leaves us right now?" johnnywup entered onto the stage in front of the letter board, showing off her flashy red evening gown. 5 letter blocks were displayed blankly on the board. She swiped her hand gracefully across the touch-sensitive board, tapping each box in succession. The letters revealed themselves one by one, spelling: noone. No-lynch. Night actions due in less than 24 hours. 13 still playing. + Show Spoiler [Finalvote] + Final Vote Count Spin 1 MrZentor (4) MrZentor Forumite prplhz strongandbig Marvellosity (4) Snarfs phagga SamuelLJackson Sbrubbles no-lynch (3) VisceraEyes Radfield marvellosity Radfield (2) Bluelightz Ace VisceraEyes (0) Snarfs (0) Ace (0) Sbrubbles (0) | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On April 24 2012 07:05 marvellosity wrote: Considerably more people trying to prevent my lynch than there are scum, in fact... Nah. I'd say VE, forumite and Rad are the ones preventing your lynch. The new guys who unvoted whoever they voted before that are sheeping after seeing 3 vets saying no-lynch is the best course of action and Ace comming in here having no clue at all what happened the whole damn day. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
--- Toad | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On April 24 2012 07:05 marvellosity wrote: Considerably more people trying to prevent my lynch than there are scum, in fact... What's your defense here, that town is preventing your mislynch or that scum is NOT preventing your mislynch? Please pick one... | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 07:10 Snarfs wrote: What's your defense here, that town is preventing your mislynch or that scum is NOT preventing your mislynch? Please pick one... It wasn't a defence, it was an observation. Is that not allowed now? | ||
| ||
|
|
CrankTV Team League
Bombastic Starleague
The PondCast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
OSC
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
