|
On April 24 2012 06:03 marvellosity wrote:
I would like to note that there has been no opposition to the growing bandwagon of my lynch when clearly scum has had the options to direct the vote almost anywhere with a maximum of 2 votes on any one person.
On April 24 2012 06:30 marvellosity wrote:
Sigh. I dislike the fact that I'm scummy because I've not been able to form a decent read although I have been extremely transparent about it. I dislike the fact no-one answered my questions on VE/Radfield cases. I dislike the fact that there's been no opposition to my lynch.
Objectively the way this lynch is going down is making it pretty clear this is going to be a mislynch.
On April 24 2012 06:58 marvellosity wrote:
The thing that ISN'T circumstancial is the fact that the lynch on me gently drifted into being without anyone trying to prevent it.
You should be able to discern the difference between the two. Engage logic please.
On April 24 2012 07:05 marvellosity wrote:
Considerably more people trying to prevent my lynch than there are scum, in fact...
Just an observation.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 07:21 Snarfs wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2012 06:03 marvellosity wrote:
I would like to note that there has been no opposition to the growing bandwagon of my lynch when clearly scum has had the options to direct the vote almost anywhere with a maximum of 2 votes on any one person. Show nested quote +On April 24 2012 06:30 marvellosity wrote:
Sigh. I dislike the fact that I'm scummy because I've not been able to form a decent read although I have been extremely transparent about it. I dislike the fact no-one answered my questions on VE/Radfield cases. I dislike the fact that there's been no opposition to my lynch.
Objectively the way this lynch is going down is making it pretty clear this is going to be a mislynch. Show nested quote +On April 24 2012 06:58 marvellosity wrote:
The thing that ISN'T circumstancial is the fact that the lynch on me gently drifted into being without anyone trying to prevent it.
You should be able to discern the difference between the two. Engage logic please. Show nested quote +On April 24 2012 07:05 marvellosity wrote:
Considerably more people trying to prevent my lynch than there are scum, in fact...
Just an observation.
So you managed to observe the fact that my lynch gained a lot of support without original opposition and then people came to their senses eventually? I dare say there's scum marv with about 5 henchmen.
|
On April 24 2012 07:03 Snarfs wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2012 06:47 Ace wrote:
@Snarfs: Where are the posts that show marvelosity soft defending players? I admit I could have read further into it than it really was, but it definitely stood out as the only thing in his filter at the time I posted: Defending: Forumite (that's who Zentor was calling thick), VE, Mr Zentor thrice, and Ace. I prefer to let people answer questions about their play themselves which is why I called him out on it.
I actually don't see those as defending any of us. More like an alternative explanation to the results someone is else is suggesting. His comment on me talking game mechanics is in line with the same thing I said.
Likewise, he is right that Zentor calling someone thick when he voted for himself to start the game is... 
If he is defending Forumite from Zentor, and then defends Zentor 3 times all on Day 1 then I think at best he is just one of those people that always responds to every post in an effort to be as transparent as possible.
Or yea, maybe he is just Scum trying to fake a contribution. Defending Zentor 3 times who isn't a good player at all is lol worthy.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 07:29 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2012 07:03 Snarfs wrote:On April 24 2012 06:47 Ace wrote:
@Snarfs: Where are the posts that show marvelosity soft defending players? I admit I could have read further into it than it really was, but it definitely stood out as the only thing in his filter at the time I posted: Defending: Forumite (that's who Zentor was calling thick), VE, Mr Zentor thrice, and Ace. I prefer to let people answer questions about their play themselves which is why I called him out on it. I actually don't see those as defending any of us. More like an alternative explanation to the results someone is else is suggesting. His comment on me talking game mechanics is in line with the same thing I said. Likewise, he is right that Zentor calling someone thick when he voted for himself to start the game is... If he is defending Forumite from Zentor, and then defends Zentor 3 times all on Day 1 then I think at best he is just one of those people that always responds to every post in an effort to be as transparent as possible. Or yea, maybe he is just Scum trying to fake a contribution. Defending Zentor 3 times who isn't a good player at all is lol worthy.
Maybe it was my mistake for continually responding, but I only had one point to make on Zentor. People kept prodding me and I kept responding is all.
|
On April 24 2012 07:29 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2012 07:03 Snarfs wrote:On April 24 2012 06:47 Ace wrote:
@Snarfs: Where are the posts that show marvelosity soft defending players? I admit I could have read further into it than it really was, but it definitely stood out as the only thing in his filter at the time I posted: Defending: Forumite (that's who Zentor was calling thick), VE, Mr Zentor thrice, and Ace. I prefer to let people answer questions about their play themselves which is why I called him out on it. I actually don't see those as defending any of us. More like an alternative explanation to the results someone is else is suggesting. His comment on me talking game mechanics is in line with the same thing I said. Likewise, he is right that Zentor calling someone thick when he voted for himself to start the game is... If he is defending Forumite from Zentor, and then defends Zentor 3 times all on Day 1 then I think at best he is just one of those people that always responds to every post in an effort to be as transparent as possible. Or yea, maybe he is just Scum trying to fake a contribution. Defending Zentor 3 times who isn't a good player at all is lol worthy.
It certainly makes more sense in the context of him knowing that he isn't a strong day 1 player. In that case it could merely be seen as an attempt at contributing. I did not look at his previous games before posting that.
|
+ Show Spoiler [Finalvote] +Final Vote Count Spin 1
MrZentor (4)
MrZentor
Forumite
prplhz
strongandbig
Marvellosity (4)
Snarfs
phagga
SamuelLJackson
Sbrubbles
no-lynch (3)
VisceraEyes
Radfield
marvellosity
Radfield (2)
Bluelightz
Ace
VisceraEyes (0)
SamuelLJackson
Radfield
Sbrubbles
Snarfs (0)
Strongandbig
prplhz
marvellosity
Ace (0)
VisceraEyes
Sbrubbles (0)
VisceraEyes
|
On April 24 2012 08:04 wherebugsgo wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Finalvote] +Final Vote Count Spin 1
MrZentor (4)
MrZentor
Forumite
prplhz
strongandbig
Marvellosity (4)
Snarfs
phagga
SamuelLJackson
Sbrubbles
no-lynch (3)
VisceraEyes
Radfield
marvellosity
Radfield (2)
Bluelightz
Ace
VisceraEyes (0)
SamuelLJackson
Radfield
Sbrubbles
Snarfs (0)
Strongandbig
prplhz
marvellosity
Ace (0)
VisceraEyes
Sbrubbles (0)
VisceraEyes
MrZentor actually voted for no-lynch here. He just didn't make it bold.
|
|
|
@prplhz: Why did you wait until 4 minutes before the deadline to post your case on MrZentor when you were online an hour and a half before that?
|
I was late because I had forgotten that I even had it and I didn't know if I wanted to lynch MrZentor. I decided on that I wanted to lynch him about 30 minutes before deadline and then I copy/pasted the case but then I noticed that I hadn't originally saved points 5-11 and I had to rewrite those. So the analysis was a little late but meh.
Medic/Jailer on Radfield tonight.
Vigilante/SK on MrZentor.
|
The original had links to different stuff that MrZentor said in points 5-11 (like points 1-4) but I dropped those for the rewrite 'cause I had to hurry.
|
On April 24 2012 06:55 Radfield wrote:
##vote no lynch
catching up
Once you're done catching up, I'd love to hear your thoughts on day 1.
|
Prphlz, no vigilante would be careless enough to kill me.
Why would the SK listen to you?
You're being stupid.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 08:39 MrZentor wrote:
Prphlz, no vigilante would be careless enough to kill me.
Why would the SK listen to you?
You're being stupid.
Any particular reason you're being so obnoxious? Just curious like.
|
Any reason you guys will put up with posts like this?
On April 24 2012 08:28 prplhz wrote:
I was late because I had forgotten that I even had it and I didn't know if I wanted to lynch MrZentor. I decided on that I wanted to lynch him about 30 minutes before deadline and then I copy/pasted the case but then I noticed that I hadn't originally saved points 5-11 and I had to rewrite those. So the analysis was a little late but meh.
Medic/Jailer on Radfield tonight.
Vigilante/SK on MrZentor.
Just curious like.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
So, no then.
I'm fairly up for a Zentor lynch at this point. He's actively playing anti-town.
|
All actions to both myself and johnnywup please.
Commercial break ends in a little over 21 hours and then it's lights camera action for phase 2 of the game.
|
Yeah at this point I think Zentor may be the SK. Compared to his actions in SS mafia, where he trolled but then got serious when someone accused him, his actions this time make no sense. They also make no sense if he's playing with a team.
OTOH, it'd be a shame if we wasted tonight and all of day 2 just sitting around in anticipation of the Zentor lynch. We should discuss other possibilities as well and see if we can find someone who's actually playing effective scum.
|
On April 24 2012 09:07 MrZentor wrote:Any reason you guys will put up with posts like this? Show nested quote +On April 24 2012 08:28 prplhz wrote:
I was late because I had forgotten that I even had it and I didn't know if I wanted to lynch MrZentor. I decided on that I wanted to lynch him about 30 minutes before deadline and then I copy/pasted the case but then I noticed that I hadn't originally saved points 5-11 and I had to rewrite those. So the analysis was a little late but meh.
Medic/Jailer on Radfield tonight.
Vigilante/SK on MrZentor. Just curious like.
I'm curious why you never voted prplhz.
|
I already posted it.
On April 24 2012 06:11 MrZentor wrote:
Hey guys! Here are my thoughts.
Forumrite and Prphlz are being stupid for attacking me even though it's obvious that I'm innocent. I have a feeling scum would switch over to an easier lynch such as Marv or Sbrubbles.
Everybody who keeps repeating how innocent I am is annoying for being ridiculously ridiculously redundant. I feel at this point talking about how innocent I am is like talking about what the masons should do.
We need to do four things.
1. Decide if we have a lynch or not- I feel we should because of what somebody said about it not helping us all if we don't lynch somebody, because we'll end up losing on the same day anyways.
2. Decide if we want to lynch a lurker or an active person- I would like to lynch a lurker, because currently there isn't any solid case on any active person, and I would prefer to lose a lurker over an active person.
3. Lower the number of possible lynch victims- I believe right now 6 different people are being voted for. That means scum have complete control of the lynch; we need to have 1-2 suspects, or we're not going to get a good lynch.
4. We need to decide who to lynch.
I'll be back soon with a suitable lurker to lynch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
