EPTwhere would we be?
Prop 8 upheld - Page 13
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
where would we be? | ||
|
jeppew
Sweden471 Posts
| ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:11 Aegraen wrote: Wrong. I guess you missed the part where it said two members of the same gender. Asexual reproduction, is conducted purely by one individual. Sigh http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bdelloidea There happy? The entire race is female. | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:13 Frits wrote: I am anti-prop 8, please prove how I did any of those things. Let me amend my statement then. Many anti-prop 8 supporters are oppressive. | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:15 Aegraen wrote: You seriously believe two non-human females can fuck? Fuck means copulation. Copulation means sexual intercourse. In the animal kingdom, it is impossible for two females to fuck, period. If they could, it would go against every single thing we know. Dictionary.com Main Entry: sexual intercourse Function: noun 1 : heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : COITUS 2 : intercourse involving genital contact between individuals other than penetration of the vagina by the penis | ||
|
2b-Rigtheous
Korea (South)50 Posts
| ||
|
scwizard
United States1195 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:15 DamageControL wrote: He said fuck. No reproduction. Therefore he owes me $50 Then he clarified fuck to mean reproduction. If you want to get technical, then fuck means sexual intercourse, and sexual intercourse means "Coitus between humans." Therefore nothing that's not human can fuck. | ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32282 Posts
god. | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
| ||
|
jeppew
Sweden471 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:15 Aegraen wrote: You seriously believe two non-human females can fuck? Fuck means copulation. Copulation means sexual intercourse. In the animal kingdom, it is impossible for two females to fuck, period. If they could, it would go against every single thing we know. except the definition of fuck is broader, as was previously mentioned. but i guess you "having a life" made you skip that post. | ||
|
MuffinDude
United States3837 Posts
| ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:16 Archerofaiur wrote: Sigh http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bdelloidea There happy? The entire race is female. I don't think you understand what asexual means. Merriam Webster: Asexual - : involving or reproducing by reproductive processes (as cell division, spore formation, fission, or budding) that do not involve the union of individuals or gametes <asexual reproduction> <an asexual generation> b: produced by asexual reproduction <asexual spores> | ||
|
scwizard
United States1195 Posts
This is using Aegraen's definition of the word fuck. End of story. Using other definitions maybe they can, but not using his. | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:18 scwizard wrote: Then he clarified fuck to mean reproduction. If you want to get technical, then fuck means sexual intercourse, and sexual intercourse means "Coitus between humans." Therefore nothing that's not human can fuck. Yeah but its obvious he's assuming that animals can fuck. Only heterosexual ones though. But it turns out he's wrong. I didn't see the reproduction part though. DISCLAIMER: If anyone points me out to be a flaming idiot I can change the entire meaning of what I said. Thank you! | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:20 scwizard wrote: Guys, two females can't fuck. This is using Aegraen's definition of the word fuck. End of story. Using other definitions maybe they can, but not using his. Oh ok. Two humans can't kiss. I'm keeping my definition a secret though, until someone proves me wrong. See how difficult that makes communication? | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:17 DamageControL wrote: Dictionary.com Main Entry: sexual intercourse Function: noun 1 : heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : COITUS 2 : intercourse involving genital contact between individuals other than penetration of the vagina by the penis Merriam-Webster is the most reputable dictionary there is for the english language, and is generally considered the only. Main Entry: sexual intercourse Function: noun Date: 1799 1 : heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : coitus 2 : intercourse (as anal or oral intercourse) that does not involve penetration of the vagina by the penis | ||
|
scwizard
United States1195 Posts
Aegraen, tell everyone here how you define fuck so we can settle this once and for all. | ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:13 Aegraen wrote: Originally, it was to point out that homosexuality, is not normal, because it goes against nature and for the propagation of species (Whether this is any merit to the arguement is for each person to think about, then again I pointed this also, because this is the true goal of the pro-gay marriage agenda, to normalize their actions). Then I threw in jest the 50$ comment, because if people would have noticed, the statement illustrated the impossibility of the situation. It happens, therefore it's part of nature, since we all originated from nature. Where do you decide nature stops and abnormal starts? Doesn't the fact that it occurs in non human nature all the time make it normal? What do you even know about the biology of homosexuality and it's effects on species? Please don't start a biological debate because your statement about the $50 bet already shows that you know nothing about the diversity of nature. Besides if you were to apply that argument you would have to conclude that women who can't get pregnant (or anyone who can't reproduce) shouldn't be allowed to marry because they go against the propagation of species. You're basically saying that anyone who isn't normal should not be allowed to marry. You draw the line at homosexuality, maybe it's time to change where we draw the line? It certainly would help diminish discrimination. | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:20 DamageControL wrote: Yeah but its obvious he's assuming that animals can fuck. Only heterosexual ones though. But it turns out he's wrong. I didn't see the reproduction part though. DISCLAIMER: If anyone points me out to be a flaming idiot I can change the entire meaning of what I said. Thank you! I didn't say only heterosexual ones. Go back and read the post. | ||
|
IntoTheWow
is awesome32282 Posts
| ||
| ||
