EPTOh, but sorry, "I'm so close-minded and need to move with the times" Give me a break... We're honestly going backwards, not forwards. Homosexual culture in Ancient Greece was around for a long time, it's nothing new!!!! The family unit has all but been, destroyed and it is because of all this political correct 'nonsense' that they feed us in the media. Now please don't misunderstand me, I have nothing against homosexuals at all (my best friend is a homosexual), but I do have a problem with normalizing it in our society.
Prop 8 upheld - Page 12
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
2b-Rigtheous
Korea (South)50 Posts
Oh, but sorry, "I'm so close-minded and need to move with the times" Give me a break... We're honestly going backwards, not forwards. Homosexual culture in Ancient Greece was around for a long time, it's nothing new!!!! The family unit has all but been, destroyed and it is because of all this political correct 'nonsense' that they feed us in the media. Now please don't misunderstand me, I have nothing against homosexuals at all (my best friend is a homosexual), but I do have a problem with normalizing it in our society. | ||
|
expendable
United States17 Posts
Oh, I'm glad you think it's laughable even though, the Bill of Rights and US Constitution clearly expresses that marriage is not a right. If you believe it is a right, then you agree with NAMBLA, pedophilia, polygamy, etc. You can't just extend rights to one group, or a few groups, a right is specific to all groups. Think this through before you start down the road of 'marriage is a right, not a benefit' Marriage is not the right - the right is equal protection under the law, which this is blatantly not. Marriage is not the issue here, the issue is that some people think it is OK to have different laws for different people (in this case, gays instead of blacks) - which is exactly what started the civil rights movement. It is impossible, for two non-human females to fuck each other. You have to have a penis (Not necessarily, in the human sense, since dildo's fill the niche of sexual intercourse), to fuck, this is called copulation, or sexual intercourse. What is so hard to comprehend. It is impossible for two members of the same gender to reproduce. I'm sure no one is disagreeing with you on this. Stop avoiding the actual issues. | ||
|
Idle
Korea (South)124 Posts
On May 30 2009 11:57 Aegraen wrote: The government is in the business of discrimination. Ever heard of Affirmative Action? Which is also something I am 100% against. Affirmative action is nothing more than discrimination of the majority, which to me is just as wrong as discrimination of the minorities. | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 11:54 scwizard wrote: Damn, women who's had sex during their lifetime with other women is at 11% according to a study. So close and yet so far. Nice dodge  Well anyways what culture considers as normal is obviously not a binary. I would still like to see homosexual relationships considered normal, because of the reasons I initially gave. Hopefully more states will embrace gay marriage, which will help homosexual relationships be considered more normal than they are now. But yeah, if you consider anything below 15% to be abnormal, and you believe that it's wrong to try and force abnormal things into the cultural norm, then I'll never be able to convince you that you should vote against proposition 8 G_G I wouldn't ever. But, again I don't live in CA, and my residency is in FL. You should be going after the black and hispanic population of CA as they are very traditional and adamantly oppose gay marriage. Most whites are actually, in favor. | ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32269 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:01 Aegraen wrote: /facepalm. It is impossible, for two non-human females to fuck each other. You have to have a penis (Not necessarily, in the human sense, since dildo's fill the niche of sexual intercourse), to fuck, this is called copulation, or sexual intercourse. What is so hard to comprehend. So when did nature become a barrier for humans? Do surgeries occure in nature? Techonlogy? You are a bad troll and your arguments are so archaic you sound beyond dumb. Your posts always full of fallacies. I take them as an insult to my intelligence, so go fuck yourself. Someone ban this idiot. | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:00 Frits wrote: Don't be a hypocrite, this is your favorite argument which you use in every thread. Not a hypocrit, those things happened and can be proven. | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:01 Aegraen wrote: /facepalm. It is impossible, for two non-human females to fuck each other. You have to have a penis (Not necessarily, in the human sense, since dildo's fill the niche of sexual intercourse), to fuck, this is called copulation, or sexual intercourse. What is so hard to comprehend. Ok, first of all fuck is definitely colloquial. Secondly, and more importantly, OBVIOUSLY this basically destroys any argument based of naturalness or whatever you were hoping to achieve. BTW: according to dictionary.com sexual intercourse (which is according to dictionary.com also what fucking is) is genital contact, esp. the insertion of the penis into the vagina followed by orgasm; coitus; copulation. NOTE: especially not exclusively Another definition: Sexual union between humans involving genital contact other than vaginal penetration by the penis. Obviously its impossible for anything besides humans (hetero or homo sexual) to fuck, in this sense, but take that out and it seems like...the moneky's are fucking. $50? | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
| ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:02 expendable wrote: It is impossible for two members of the same gender to reproduce. Not true http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blacktip_shark "In the absence of males, females are also capable of asexual reproduction." | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:06 Archerofaiur wrote: Aegraen you better be paying at least one of us. Hands you ten rubels. | ||
|
Idle
Korea (South)124 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:01 2b-Rigtheous wrote: Our kids will be exposed to this, and there is a lot of evidence that suggests environmental factors play a huge role in making one homosexual or not. I certainly don't want my future kids to think being homosexual is normal and fine, when it clearly isn't. I'd love to see one unbiased study that suggests environmental factors play a role in one's sexuality. The only ones I can find have been done by or funded by organizations with an anti-homosexual agenda. You need to support your argument with evidence. Additionally, saying something "clearly" isn't fine is a complete joke when that's the basis of an entire debate. If its being debated then sorry bud but its not clearly anything. | ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:01 Aegraen wrote: /facepalm. It is impossible, for two non-human females to fuck each other. You have to have a penis (Not necessarily, in the human sense, since dildo's fill the niche of sexual intercourse), to fuck, this is called copulation, or sexual intercourse. What is so hard to comprehend. What's so hard to comprehend is why any of this is relevant to anything. | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:10 Archerofaiur wrote: Not true http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blacktip_shark "In the absence of males, females are also capable of asexual reproduction." Wrong. I guess you missed the part where it said two members of the same gender. Asexual reproduction, is conducted purely by one individual. | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:10 Frits wrote: What's so hard to comprehend is why any of this is relevant to anything. Regardless... I think I've shown him to be fairly wrong. | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
A) wrong when you made that statement and B) not the kind of person who would follow through on his word anyway | ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:05 Aegraen wrote: Not a hypocrit, those things happened and can be proven. I am anti-prop 8, please prove how I did any of those things. | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:10 Frits wrote: What's so hard to comprehend is why any of this is relevant to anything. Originally, it was to point out that homosexuality, is not normal, because it goes against nature and for the propagation of species (Whether this is any merit to the arguement is for each person to think about, then again I pointed this also, because this is the true goal of the pro-gay marriage agenda, to normalize their actions). Then I threw in jest the 50$ comment, because if people would have noticed, the statement illustrated the impossibility of the situation. | ||
|
scwizard
United States1195 Posts
I still haven't seen an example of two members of the same gender, in a two (or more) gendered species, being capable of sexual reproduction. | ||
|
Aegraen
United States1225 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:12 Archerofaiur wrote: You said 50$. Its ok though cause everyone knew you were A) wrong when you made that statement and B) not the kind of person who would follow through on his word anyway You seriously believe two non-human females can fuck? Fuck means copulation. Copulation means sexual intercourse. In the animal kingdom, it is impossible for two females to fuck, period. If they could, it would go against every single thing we know. | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On May 30 2009 12:14 scwizard wrote: Aegraen is actually correct and doesn't owe any of you people jack. I still haven't seen an example of two members of the same gender, in a two (or more) gendered species, being capable of sexual reproduction. He said fuck. No reproduction. Therefore he owes me $50 | ||
| ||
