[EURO 2016] Knockout Stage! - Page 12
Forum Index > UEFA Euro 2016 |
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
| ||
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
| ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
at least for this corner | ||
Grettin
42381 Posts
| ||
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:49 Shellshock wrote: pull the keeper for this free kick at least for this corner Well he was there for the corner. Both were awful though. ![]() | ||
NihiLStarcraft
Denmark1413 Posts
| ||
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:43 HolydaKing wrote: Well Northern Ireland definitely deserves to go out. Horrible own goal and no Will Grigg. It wasn't really a horrible own goal... the quality on the ball made it so that Mcauley had to go for it. And honestly yes the pedigree on these teams is lower but i think if you are going to say they don't deserve to be there that's rather unfair. This is the kind of comment that comes around when people barely watch anything and show up as experts the day off.. | ||
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:52 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: We missed out on 30 more minutes of agony Pretty much... Hope Croatia vs. Portugal will be better. | ||
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:53 HolydaKing wrote: Pretty much... Hope Croatia vs. Portugal will be better. It will be! Best match of ro16 together with Spain-Italy | ||
Makro
France16890 Posts
| ||
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:53 HolydaKing wrote: Pretty much... Hope Croatia vs. Portugal will be better. If Portugal doesn't step up its game compared to the group stage, we're good for some Mexico vs Chile stuff | ||
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:54 Makro wrote: two historical result by far in one day with poland and wales advancing Weren't these two games guaranteed to be historical results?^^ | ||
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:54 OtherWorld wrote: If Portugal doesn't step up its game compared to the group stage, we're good for some Mexico vs Chile stuff I'd love that! Go Croatia! ![]() | ||
NihiLStarcraft
Denmark1413 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:53 Rebs wrote: It wasn't really a horrible own goal... the quality on the ball made it so that Mcauley had to go for it. And honestly yes the pedigree on these teams is lower but i think if you are going to say they don't deserve to be there that's rather unfair. This is the kind of comment that comes around when people barely watch anything and show up as experts the day off.. Wow, calm down there ![]() | ||
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:58 NihiLStarcraft wrote: Wow, calm down there ![]() Wales won their group though ahead of England. | ||
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On June 26 2016 02:58 NihiLStarcraft wrote: Wow, calm down there ![]() This is also incorrect. these teams made it here playing these "tier 1 teams" Im not offended, not sure why I should be, but your comment was rather arrogant and ignorant so it should be called out. And then you went and doubled down on it. It is also incorrect to suggested that the expanded euro is to blame for the way the bracket worked out. The bracket worked out this way because some tier 1 teams played inferior to these teams in the group stages and even the ones who didnt barely scraped through their victories. (ala France) | ||
NihiLStarcraft
Denmark1413 Posts
But I guess my opinion here, when I say Wales, Northern Ireland, Switzerland and Poland all played horrible football so far in this tourney, is somehow "arrogant and ignorant". So I'll keep it to myself, have fun! | ||
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On June 26 2016 03:10 NihiLStarcraft wrote: I don't count England as a tier 1 team at the moment. But I guess my opinion here, when I say Wales, Northern Ireland, Switzerland and Poland all played horrible football so far in this tourney, is somehow "arrogant and ignorant". So I'll keep it to myself, have fun! No your didnt just say they played horrible football. Which is debatable. You said they didnt deserve to be there. That is both arrogant and ignorant. | ||
| ||