|
On March 20 2011 06:00 dtz wrote:
Very mature and professional by TL
I love the fact that TL does not go for the "easy way out" but instead try to go for the "most correct one" It will be easy to just force a regame.
Quite a disappointing response by Prae and Nightend. If you want to " no comment" then don't comment. If you want to put a statement protesting the decision with logical arguments then do so. Don't be passive aggressive about it.
Seconded. No comment means no comment, whether or not your opinion differs from the one that the TL panel made.
Applaud TL for the professionalism in this scenario.
|
Wow, even though while watching game live I was sure Boxer had g1 easily, reading OP and how much work and thought was put into this, I think no one should disagree with with your decission. Big props for effort of TSL staff. This tournament will be (IS!) the best  Regards
|
Any chance you guys could do Jaedong vs Flash game 3 in nate msl? lol
Great thread tho, tl handled the situation rlly well
|
good call, i love the battle sim thing, also, MC's explanation makes a lot of sense, the situation was irreversible, unless this was a bronze ladder game ^^
|
So if Boxer had vetoed a different panel member, and Cloud had submitted his decision, then it would have been a re-game? Since that in order to award a win to the disconnecting player a unanimous decision is needed.
Very professional by TL, though of course, the use of fewer panel members directly hurt Nightend's chances since he only needed one person to think it should be a re-game, while Boxer needed a unanimous vote.
edit: hit quote instead of edit t.t
|
Thank you to everyone at TL for the great process you have in place to deal with these unpleasant situations.
I personally disagree with the panel's decision, but I have every bit of respect for the process that was followed. I also know that the members of that panel have much much better understanding of the game and situation than I do.
|
Great decision, wonderful professionalism.
I'm in awe of how you guys work these things out.
|
On March 20 2011 06:17 SupastaR wrote:
We, Praetoriani and NightEnD wish to NOT COMMENT on the issues concerning the match between BoxeR and NightEnD, it's like fighting Goliath with no stones lying around.
oshit
If this quote is truly theirs, they should get punished. When you win you don't care what happened, I knew beforehand Boxer was going to take game 3 thanks to them.
|
I'm loving how transparent it was. Good work TSL admins.
|
Very professional handling!!! PROPS
|
On March 20 2011 06:51 Crais wrote:
I'm loving how transparent it was. Good work TSL admins.
True. Only if RL governments were as transparent as this. World would be a better place.
|
Very professional by TL, you guys decided well
|
Only thing I don't understand is why would Nightend veto anyone if an unanimous decision is required to award Boxer the game?
Vetoing only makes sense if the panelist was replaced. Maybe he doesn't fully grasp the implication of the panelist not being replaced, or was first asked to veto and then asked to accede to only 3 panelists.
If this is the case, the organizers should at least re-instate Tyler since it is clearly in Nightend's interest to hear Tyler if no other panelist can be found to replace him.
|
As Artosis would've said, this post brought nerd tears to my eyes! Awesome job admins.
|
Regardless of how you feel about the interpretation, you've got to give credit to TL for being very thorough and clear in their responses. This was a very thorough review process that has a level of transparency I think all of us can respect. Anyone who thinks that TL didn't try their hardest to get a fair result is nuts.
Personally, I agreed with their decision when the game was aired and agree doubly so after reading this review. I'm really glad to see so much care taken with this tournament.
|
I thought it was a re-game until I find out only 2 pheonix have energy to lift. At that point it's impossible to come back as the pheonix were his only hope.
|
On March 20 2011 06:53 nexusil wrote:
Only thing I don't understand is why would Nightend veto anyone if an unanimous decision is required to award Boxer the game?
Vetoing only makes sense if the panelist was replaced. Maybe he doesn't fully grasp the implication of the panelist not being replaced, or was first asked to veto and then asked to accede to only 3 panelists.
If this is the case, the organizers should at least re-instate Tyler since it is clearly in Nightend's interest to hear Tyler if no other panelist can be found to replace him.
^That's what we call a wrong decision. You are right though, he shouldn't have vetoed anyone to up his chances.
|
On March 20 2011 06:51 samaNo4 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2011 06:17 SupastaR wrote:
We, Praetoriani and NightEnD wish to NOT COMMENT on the issues concerning the match between BoxeR and NightEnD, it's like fighting Goliath with no stones lying around.
oshit If this quote is truly theirs, they should get punished. When you win you don't care what happened, I knew beforehand Boxer was going to take game 3 thanks to them.
thb, I'm still not entirely sure what they are trying to say.
|
On March 20 2011 06:51 samaNo4 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2011 06:17 SupastaR wrote:
We, Praetoriani and NightEnD wish to NOT COMMENT on the issues concerning the match between BoxeR and NightEnD, it's like fighting Goliath with no stones lying around.
oshit If this quote is truly theirs, they should get punished. When you win you don't care what happened, I knew beforehand Boxer was going to take game 3 thanks to them.
Actually you should be mad at TL for publishing the comment before the series was completely casted, not at them, it was an easy oversight to make though. I understand why TL posted this immediately after the first game instead of after the series though, it definitely helped keep people satisfied with the decision.
|
Very impressed by the professionalism of the TSL. Keep it up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
