EPTClouD vs G5 Results and Interview - Page 13
| Forum Index > TSL2 Forum |
|
Ilikestarcraft
Korea (South)17719 Posts
| ||
|
OhThatDang
United States4685 Posts
On January 09 2010 04:39 Liquid`NonY wrote: as motbob pointed out, that isnt what skela wrote. i just read and responded to what he wrote. and why do you always have this disbelief? seriously? did you even watch the replay? what a stupid response is this of yours? give us a break. who are you talking to? nobody called you dumb. he called magic~phil dumb. just give up kid in skela's sentence, if you replace "good" with "better" then it would make sense. huge difference in meaning between those two and there's never any instance where one can mean the other. so i dont see how it's so easy to understand. but if you read skela's post history, you'd familiarize yourself with his habit of writing nonsense. so you wouldnt think "oh he accidentally didnt use a comparative" but rather "where are some pins so i can gouge out my eyes" Lol is there really an argument over what was said.... Its simply meaning that Because cloud has a better pvz than G5 in his opinion, he believes that G5 is going to lose the match. That's all that skela says | ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13017 Posts
| ||
|
Chaos
United States772 Posts
On January 09 2010 05:22 Freezard wrote: Well, then I had too high expectations I guess. This was terrible play by Cloud. It seems he just focused 100% on macro and didn't even watch the battles. He never even stormed many templars even though he had tons of energy and storm, annoyed me a lot. Felt like he surrendered before the game was over. As for G5's play, well, I guess it was the perfect counter to Cloud's type of play - not giving him time. Still remains to see how good he is. When I watched game 1 (assuming thats the one you are talking about) storm wasn't finished when he got attacked. | ||
NonY
8748 Posts
On January 09 2010 05:53 OhThatDang wrote: Lol is there really an argument over what was said.... Its simply meaning that Because cloud has a better pvz than G5 in his opinion, he believes that G5 is going to lose the match. That's all that skela says What are you saying differently than what's already been said? What's the point of your post? See how PvP makes everybody crazy and stupid. Surely everyone can empathize with Cloud now that we see how crazy people post after just watching PvP, not even playing it. Except me of course ezly | ||
|
Trezeguet
United States2656 Posts
On January 09 2010 06:11 Liquid`NonY wrote: What are you saying differently than what's already been said? What's the point of your post? See how PvP makes everybody crazy and stupid. Surely everyone can empathize with Cloud now that we see how crazy people post after just watching PvP, not even playing it. Except me of course ezly This makes me hope there are no TvTs. | ||
|
SoL[9]
Portugal1370 Posts
| ||
|
Freezard
Sweden997 Posts
On January 09 2010 06:00 Chaos- wrote: When I watched game 1 (assuming thats the one you are talking about) storm wasn't finished when he got attacked. No I was talking about game 2. In the end I saw 3-4 templars and since he had speedlots I really thought he had storm as well. But now when I watch the replay I see he canceled storm 5 seconds after he started it... too bad, would have won him the game. Weird decisions anyway: -upgrade legs as soon as citadel finishes when he doesn't use the speedlots anyway (which delayed storm/dt) -morph 2 archons when G5 didn't even have citadel and just ~5 zealots -move out without observer when G5's observer sees everything Then Cloud comes here and comments about G5 not scouting... dude, he had an observer on your forces for ages whereas you had nothing in his base. | ||
|
Mentos
United Kingdom203 Posts
Splitting your army to look for drops that you're not even sure exist when you can clearly see that your opponent is going for all in push is a rookie mistake, so forgive me if I laugh at Cloud's claims that his prep was better. I will also laugh at his overall behaviour in this thread, it's not a losers' place to say that his opponent played very simple or risky rounds, or this or that, his place is analyzing his mistakes and learning from them, nothing more, nothing less. That's the kind of mentality someone who truly wishes to excel at his game should show. So no, I don't agree that G5's play was bad or even average, in fact nearly all his decisions were dead on, his control was also very good and he deserved to win hands down. Both players can always arrange a rematch if Cloud can't hold down his nerves in high stakes games, my money will still be on G5. | ||
|
Texas
Germany2388 Posts
| ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
hey liquid`nony!! i do not think that you are a very good protoss player at all!!! perhaps you should try knitting instead!!! | ||
|
NiGoL
1868 Posts
how could u say it like that R O F L | ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
| ||
|
Pure.Freedom
United States114 Posts
So, congratulations G5 | ||
|
NonY
8748 Posts
On January 09 2010 09:55 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: let's take this to the next level!!!!!! hey liquid`nony!! i do not think that you are a very good protoss player at all!!! perhaps you should try knitting instead!!! underwater knitting is where it's at | ||
|
CakeOrI)eath
United States327 Posts
G5_G5_vs_Ret.rep | ||
|
Epicfailguy
Norway893 Posts
Seriously, I really think that would help. As for not shaking hands when you play shit, well that's just silly and I hope you'll understand that...although I'm not surprised since italians arent very nice people, no offence. | ||
|
Brett
Australia3820 Posts
Basket weaving I should think. | ||
|
alexpnd
Canada1857 Posts
| ||
|
anotak
United States1537 Posts
and being nervous isn't an excuse, that's part of the skill in any tournament game. | ||
| ||
