|
Hm... I don't like the whole Ladder system, the more i think of it the worse i think it is to decide who can take part in a tourney.
But it's also hard to just *come up* with something better, i would for sure *set* some players in (WCG participants/quarter finalists or something, winners/finalists of other tourneys...) and then have a ladder where *the rest* can brawl it out. Or just have a *closed* ladder with no non participants playing an important role.
I just hate to think about the fact, that some people that probably could and would qualify, just lack the time to do it right now.
Well, will be awesome anyway .
|
lol those russian terrans..I am sure A2 thinks he is fine with 9100,I remember I had to contact EX the last few hours in the last TSL
|
On December 09 2009 01:13 redtooth wrote:Show nested quote +On December 08 2009 18:13 Glaucus wrote: lol obviously he didn't say Idra is out of shape. Where the hell does that come from... uhh it comes from... this thread? Show nested quote +On December 08 2009 14:21 IdrA wrote:On December 08 2009 14:07 Liquid`NonY wrote:On December 08 2009 13:43 TryThis wrote: holy, sens catch up to idra! im sure he'll have to get A+ to do it cuz it looks like idra is gonna finish his session today with A+ depends on how many times i get double nexused and one guy went 1 hatch lurker whens the last time someone went 1 hatch lurker Show nested quote +On December 08 2009 15:23 MorroW[MB] wrote: just cause u let ur opponent 12nex doesnt mean uve lost
ur just in bad shape
go vult fe armory fac aca ebay gas and ull end up with more econ and faster tech than if he didnt 13nex. so all and all he will win on it but you will also be further ahead than a normal tech tree xd its playable
these tosses who 12nex cut probes so ridiculously much so we see all these dragoons and buildings but what many ppl forget is that they have so few probes glaucus ur dumb. at least read the thread before you start being stupid. your double standard and blind fanboyism for morrow is disgusting. read the thread. its not "mind games". its spite between the two due to eh fact some of the top players started bashing on morrow and he got defensive. You misinterpreted MorroW's quote... what that line means is that a player whose opponent gets away with 12 nexus is in bad shape.
|
Norway28556 Posts
ahhhhh at first today i was just playing really really good players and losing because they were way better than me then later today I have just been playing like a retard and losing vs bad players too data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" bad day! but tomorrow time2rise!
|
On December 09 2009 00:44 motbob wrote: TSL.IdrA vs eunbin0904 // 31:48 +130 can't wait for Idra's rep pack, if it's released this time Why, who is eunbin0904, someone notable? If you just pinpoint it due to the rarity of the event of Idra beating an A korean in a big macro game in this ladder, its fair enough, yet a bit ironic, as we're talking about an A+ playerdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Then again, I want Idra to stay A+ and Kwark to get back into the top48, I dont have double standards:D
|
Dreiven Top 48
|
On December 09 2009 00:36 LorDo wrote:So thats nony or you just thought it would be funny with the name and the race? that was a korean unless he was faking engrish
|
On December 09 2009 01:33 Incanus wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2009 01:13 redtooth wrote:On December 08 2009 18:13 Glaucus wrote: lol obviously he didn't say Idra is out of shape. Where the hell does that come from... uhh it comes from... this thread? On December 08 2009 14:21 IdrA wrote:On December 08 2009 14:07 Liquid`NonY wrote:On December 08 2009 13:43 TryThis wrote: holy, sens catch up to idra! im sure he'll have to get A+ to do it cuz it looks like idra is gonna finish his session today with A+ depends on how many times i get double nexused and one guy went 1 hatch lurker whens the last time someone went 1 hatch lurker On December 08 2009 15:23 MorroW[MB] wrote: just cause u let ur opponent 12nex doesnt mean uve lost
ur just in bad shape
go vult fe armory fac aca ebay gas and ull end up with more econ and faster tech than if he didnt 13nex. so all and all he will win on it but you will also be further ahead than a normal tech tree xd its playable
these tosses who 12nex cut probes so ridiculously much so we see all these dragoons and buildings but what many ppl forget is that they have so few probes glaucus ur dumb. at least read the thread before you start being stupid. your double standard and blind fanboyism for morrow is disgusting. read the thread. its not "mind games". its spite between the two due to eh fact some of the top players started bashing on morrow and he got defensive. You misinterpreted MorroW's quote... what that line means is that a player whose opponent gets away with 12 nexus is in bad shape. dude go read the thread. idra starts complaining about 12 nexus. he says it turns into a coin flip and that you auto-lose if you don't proxy rax. morrow comes in, having been bashed by idra and others earlier in the thread, and says YOU'RE in bad shape, referring to IDRA, the person who started the conversation, the main proponent of that discussion, and the only one really complaining about the strategy at the time. are you implying that morrow randomly threw out strategy advice to the generic public in a ladder standings thread, coincidentally using the word "ur" in the progress? or are you implying that he was giving advice to Conquest101, the only other guy who use any synonym of "cheap" to describe 12 nexus?
whether morrow meant it or not is irrelevant. i simply said that he has some big cajones to say that to rage-master idra.
|
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
|
That couldn't have been Nony. Most of the games were on Destination and Heartbreak. Nony wouldn't practice on Heartbreak, since that's not in the TSL map pool. In fact, that toss's map list was all over the place.
Edit: (In reference to IPromiseYou vs. Idra)
|
|
The chance that Idra wins is most likely higher than all the chances that a single other player wins, yes. But the chance that he wins isn't extremely high (as in close to 100%). He is not invincible, there are several people who have a noteworthy chance of taking him out in a boX, including any kind of nonstandard play that may catch him off-guard.
Assume that he gets into the top16, then, to win the tourney, he has to beat 4 players. Assume that he has a 90% chance of winning against each of them. The chance that he wins the whole tourney then is 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9 * 0.9 = 0.6561, so less than 2/3rd. And I honestly doubt that he has a 90% chance of winning against each of the players he will face. If he had 70% against them all, his chances of placing first would be down to 24%. 70% was chosen arbitrarily to show how quickly the overall chance decreases. I don't think anyone can give reliable values for this.
|
On December 09 2009 01:25 redtooth wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2009 01:15 CubEdIn wrote:On December 08 2009 22:43 Chrispy wrote:On December 08 2009 22:25 MaGic~PhiL wrote: u lose if u cant adapt u lose if u cant read a player properly..
its your fault its not cheap no matter how someone beats u in this particular game he was just better..
I dont know how someone as clever as idra cant comprehend this Or perhaps... the #1 foreigner, the guy who is currently residing in a Korean pro gaming house and playing 10+ hours a day... knows more about Starcraft than you do? Just sayin'. Why do you think #1 TSL ladder is so important? If he were in top 12 he would risk losing before getting in the top 4. Be it to cheeses (which to me is just as fair as any other game) or to players who think better than him (not necessarily execution, he might be one of the best at that, but players with more "talent"). So yeah, I hope he stays on top of everyone else, because if he doesn't I doubt we'll see him in the finals. Just my two cents. well yeah the chances of idra 'winning it all' aren't as high as some people believe. but thats just statistics at work. there's a higher chance of 'someone else' winning TSL2 but regardless i think Idra is the general consensus favorite. like lets say (NUMBERS MADE TO SHOW EXAMPLE) that idra has a 49% chance of winning it all. that means it still isn't 'probable' that he'll win. no there's a 51% chance that one of the other 51 (48+seeded) will win. so if a bet was offered to you worded as "do think you think idra will win it all or not" then you should probably vote no. if it was worded "who do you think will win" you should probably vote idra.
I understand what you're saying but that's not what I meant. Theoretically, he is better than (almost) everyone else in the top 48, yet, if he were not to place on #1, I'm pretty sure he would lose somewhere on the way from top 16 to top 4. That's what I meant. And that's not really based on chance, since it's not BO1 and he has way more practice time/etc, it should be a sure thing. But it's not. It's way safer to be top 4 directly and only have to beat 2-3 people for a lot of cash, than risking to lose to someone in the top12, who can take you down 2 games out of 3 even though you would probably win a bo9 against him. That's what I meant. It's not like it's Bisu or Jaedong there, of whom you are pretty sure that he won't lose a bo3 against anyone in the entire TSL.
That is all I meant about the #1 top foreigner not being such a sure thing. If it were, then TSL wouldn't be so fun now would it?
|
On December 09 2009 01:47 redtooth wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2009 01:33 Incanus wrote:On December 09 2009 01:13 redtooth wrote:On December 08 2009 18:13 Glaucus wrote: lol obviously he didn't say Idra is out of shape. Where the hell does that come from... uhh it comes from... this thread? On December 08 2009 14:21 IdrA wrote:On December 08 2009 14:07 Liquid`NonY wrote:On December 08 2009 13:43 TryThis wrote: holy, sens catch up to idra! im sure he'll have to get A+ to do it cuz it looks like idra is gonna finish his session today with A+ depends on how many times i get double nexused and one guy went 1 hatch lurker whens the last time someone went 1 hatch lurker On December 08 2009 15:23 MorroW[MB] wrote: just cause u let ur opponent 12nex doesnt mean uve lost
ur just in bad shape
go vult fe armory fac aca ebay gas and ull end up with more econ and faster tech than if he didnt 13nex. so all and all he will win on it but you will also be further ahead than a normal tech tree xd its playable
these tosses who 12nex cut probes so ridiculously much so we see all these dragoons and buildings but what many ppl forget is that they have so few probes glaucus ur dumb. at least read the thread before you start being stupid. your double standard and blind fanboyism for morrow is disgusting. read the thread. its not "mind games". its spite between the two due to eh fact some of the top players started bashing on morrow and he got defensive. You misinterpreted MorroW's quote... what that line means is that a player whose opponent gets away with 12 nexus is in bad shape. dude go read the thread. idra starts complaining about 12 nexus. he says it turns into a coin flip and that you auto-lose if you don't proxy rax. morrow comes in, having been bashed by idra and others earlier in the thread, and says YOU'RE in bad shape, referring to IDRA, the person who started the conversation, the main proponent of that discussion, and the only one really complaining about the strategy at the time. are you implying that morrow randomly threw out strategy advice to the generic public in a ladder standings thread, coincidentally using the word "ur" in the progress? or are you implying that he was giving advice to Conquest101, the only other guy who use any synonym of "cheap" to describe 12 nexus? whether morrow meant it or not is irrelevant. i simply said that he has some big cajones to say that to rage-master idra. what are you talking about? it was obviously a general "you" as in if you let a protoss get their double nexus you're behind.
|
On December 09 2009 01:38 Boblion wrote:Dreiven Top 48 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" BBQ Toss fighting!
|
On December 09 2009 01:54 myzael wrote:BBQ Toss fighting!
Whooooo!!!
|
|
On December 09 2009 01:37 538 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2009 00:44 motbob wrote: TSL.IdrA vs eunbin0904 // 31:48 +130 can't wait for Idra's rep pack, if it's released this time Why, who is eunbin0904, someone notable? If you just pinpoint it due to the rarity of the event of Idra beating an A korean in a big macro game in this ladder, its fair enough, yet a bit ironic, as we're talking about an A+ player data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Then again, I want Idra to stay A+ and Kwark to get back into the top48, I dont have double standards:D
That guy also got A+ in the two previous seasons with a good win% (290 - 230, 208 - 143) so it really was A+ Kor vs Idra
basically shows Idra's TvZ is insanely strong, beating another A+ in a long game
|
gratz for idra for A+. as much as i dont like him it is a big achievement for a foreigner.
|
On December 09 2009 01:47 redtooth wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2009 01:33 Incanus wrote:On December 09 2009 01:13 redtooth wrote:On December 08 2009 18:13 Glaucus wrote: lol obviously he didn't say Idra is out of shape. Where the hell does that come from... uhh it comes from... this thread? On December 08 2009 14:21 IdrA wrote:On December 08 2009 14:07 Liquid`NonY wrote:On December 08 2009 13:43 TryThis wrote: holy, sens catch up to idra! im sure he'll have to get A+ to do it cuz it looks like idra is gonna finish his session today with A+ depends on how many times i get double nexused and one guy went 1 hatch lurker whens the last time someone went 1 hatch lurker On December 08 2009 15:23 MorroW[MB] wrote: just cause u let ur opponent 12nex doesnt mean uve lost
ur just in bad shape
go vult fe armory fac aca ebay gas and ull end up with more econ and faster tech than if he didnt 13nex. so all and all he will win on it but you will also be further ahead than a normal tech tree xd its playable
these tosses who 12nex cut probes so ridiculously much so we see all these dragoons and buildings but what many ppl forget is that they have so few probes glaucus ur dumb. at least read the thread before you start being stupid. your double standard and blind fanboyism for morrow is disgusting. read the thread. its not "mind games". its spite between the two due to eh fact some of the top players started bashing on morrow and he got defensive. You misinterpreted MorroW's quote... what that line means is that a player whose opponent gets away with 12 nexus is in bad shape. dude go read the thread. idra starts complaining about 12 nexus. he says it turns into a coin flip and that you auto-lose if you don't proxy rax. morrow comes in, having been bashed by idra and others earlier in the thread, and says YOU'RE in bad shape, referring to IDRA, the person who started the conversation, the main proponent of that discussion, and the only one really complaining about the strategy at the time. are you implying that morrow randomly threw out strategy advice to the generic public in a ladder standings thread, coincidentally using the word "ur" in the progress? or are you implying that he was giving advice to Conquest101, the only other guy who use any synonym of "cheap" to describe 12 nexus? whether morrow meant it or not is irrelevant. i simply said that he has some big cajones to say that to rage-master idra. It's kind of silly to be parsing semantics to this extent, but if we're doing that, it was very clearly a general "you": the colloquial version of "one". Consider:
"just cause u let ur opponent 12nex doesnt mean uve lost
ur just in bad shape
go vult fe armory fac aca ebay gas and ull end up with more econ and faster tech than if he didnt 13nex. so all and all he will win on it but you will also be further ahead than a normal tech tree xd its playable"
"doesn't mean you have lost", "go ____ and you will end up with", "you will be further ahead", are all talking about hypothetical situations. Thus the "you" is a hypothetical "you" as well: anyone who lets the Protoss gets away with a 12-nexus is "in bad shape" for that game.
|
|
|
|