|
just wanted to point that out
On December 08 2009 18:15 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
sounds good!
Don't let "I didn't read the rules" be an excuse please.
On December 08 2009 19:37 {88}iNcontroL wrote:Show nested quote +On December 08 2009 19:33 MaGic~PhiL wrote:
But please admins: Many people are not even reading tl.net and might not know. This
You should definitely post massive links on the iccup team page as well so that almost everyone can see it..
really ! =)
other than that: good rule ! NO people playing TEAMLIQUID STAR LEAGUE should READ the RULES on TEAMLIQUID. It isn't TEAMLIQUID's job to go force idiots to read all their rules when the rules are about as available as is possible/expected for a tourney being ran from the website that has a dedicated forum with links to everything you could possibly need to know about the tourney YOU (the proverbial you) signed up for.
On December 08 2009 20:41 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
I understand you disagree. You've been doing that with me for a very long time now. It just so happens I'm representing accountability and responsibility and you prefer holding hands and helping the handicapped read big words.
They want to take a crack at 20k$ in prizes but cannot be bothered to read the rules on the home website for the tourney? Fuck them rofl
|
On December 12 2009 21:44 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
9638 with 1 130 pt win pending (he disc'd on me) so that puts me at 9758 which is tied for 28th.
NOW LADIES AND GENTS
I face a dilemma:
Do I:
A. Stay here, be happy with this.
B. Play a couple more games and get top 24. I am 1 win shy of it now and if it changes 2 wins should put me in there.
CHOICES...
130 points minus that 4-0 session you had (I think around -130 too) so you are not clear yet to qualify.
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
uh hey guys, don't get all fucking pissy ok? Casper/Kr made a mistake, guess what? so did I? It was 3:44am and I lost track of how many times I beat a guy who is 30x better than you guys combined, RELAX.
I still have a win pending and tomorrow to take care of business should I need to. I read the rules I just simply forgot. Quoting me and shit is out of context.
|
sen fell out of the top 48.
is that on purpose (because F91 cheated)?
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
went and won a game so even if they remove my game I am still 9768 after complaint goes through.
|
Naugrim, wake up!!!!
Lalush and Daze, you need to qualify too!
|
hypocrite of the day award goes to incontrol )
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
I read the rules. I said "don't let 'I didn't read the rules be an excuse'"
I didn't follow the rules on accident.
I'm not stating any excuse like I discussed.
DO YOU KNOW WHAT HYPOCRITE MEANS? ARE YOU ALWAYS THIS RETARDED?
Holy shit people.. have you no concept of reality? I can be mad at the people who argue ignorance is a reason to overlook the breaking of a rule AND break a rule/hold myself accountable ESPECIALLY when it was an honest mistake lol
|
:-o Sen on 1-8 streak, currently at #55...
|
Holy cow. Last time I checked, kolll was down in the 90s. Now he's #14. What a beast.
|
|
|
Too bad about Sen, I really hope he makes it in the few remaining hours. And Ret is far from safe in the top 12, why isn't he playing?
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On December 12 2009 23:25 Too_MuchZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 21:44 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
9638 with 1 130 pt win pending (he disc'd on me) so that puts me at 9758 which is tied for 28th.
NOW LADIES AND GENTS
I face a dilemma:
Do I:
A. Stay here, be happy with this.
B. Play a couple more games and get top 24. I am 1 win shy of it now and if it changes 2 wins should put me in there.
CHOICES... 130 points minus that 4-0 session you had (I think around -130 too) so you are not clear yet to qualify.
btw if they remove the 4th game it was 97 pts not 130.
!!!
|
On December 12 2009 23:59 ProoM wrote:http://www.iccup.com/matchlist/292573/1x1.htmlMorrow vs Dimaga 4:0 then 5:1 then 5:6 Isn't this violation of the rules? when morrow was 3:0 vs dimaga, they kept playing, it got 4:0 and they still kept playing...
Since that was on monday, I think they are ok.
|
On December 12 2009 23:59 ProoM wrote:http://www.iccup.com/matchlist/292573/1x1.htmlMorrow vs Dimaga 4:0 then 5:1 then 5:6 Isn't this violation of the rules? when morrow was 3:0 vs dimaga, they kept playing, it got 4:0 and they still kept playing...
That was like 5 days ago. The rule only applies for the last 72 hours.
edit: late as usual 
|
On December 12 2009 23:59 ProoM wrote:http://www.iccup.com/matchlist/292573/1x1.htmlMorrow vs Dimaga 4:0 then 5:1 then 5:6 Isn't this violation of the rules? when morrow was 3:0 vs dimaga, they kept playing, it got 4:0 and they still kept playing...
this was before the rules changed??
|
prom i believe these games were like 5 or 6 days ago, not 3.
|
kollls a beast
T_T
i hope he comes on today again and pushes for the top 12
=)
|
Sen starts bouncing back with a win over a korean A protoss I'm so sorry that I'll have to sleep during the last hours of this ladder
|
On December 13 2009 00:01 {88}iNcontroL wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 23:25 Too_MuchZerg wrote:On December 12 2009 21:44 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
9638 with 1 130 pt win pending (he disc'd on me) so that puts me at 9758 which is tied for 28th.
NOW LADIES AND GENTS
I face a dilemma:
Do I:
A. Stay here, be happy with this.
B. Play a couple more games and get top 24. I am 1 win shy of it now and if it changes 2 wins should put me in there.
CHOICES... 130 points minus that 4-0 session you had (I think around -130 too) so you are not clear yet to qualify. btw if they remove the 4th game it was 97 pts not 130. !!!
130 was guess... I recommend making sure that you print screen your rank points at end of ladder just to see how many points you will lose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
